| Literature DB >> 32201419 |
Toyohiro Kato1, Hajime Ichikawa1, Kenta Miwa2, Koichi Okuda3, Takayuki Shibutani4, Akio Nagaki5, Hiroyuki Tsushima6.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to clarify the routine protocols and the frequency of added or omitted imaging on nuclear medicine imaging in Japan. A nationwide survey on routine protocols and current state of added or omitted imaging in major nuclear medicine imaging were performed for Japanese nuclear medicine technologist. The survey showed that the routine protocols were almost 100% fixed, some of the routine protocols were found to be useful and percentage of imaging techniques such as single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography that increased patient burden and reduced through put were low. Furthermore, the survey showed that additional or omission imaging were frequently performed on bone scintigraphy and positron emission tomography and added or omitted judgements were often depend upon the rule of thumb by nuclear medicine technologist. In this study, we have concluded that the quality of examination and the diagnosis might depend on the knowledge of nuclear medicine technologist, performed added or omitted imaging.Entities:
Keywords: additional scan; evidence; nuclear medicine imaging; omission scan; routing protocol
Year: 2020 PMID: 32201419 DOI: 10.6009/jjrt.2020_JSRT_76.3.285
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi ISSN: 0369-4305