| Literature DB >> 32201175 |
Fotios G Pitoulis1, Waseem Hasan1, Mary Papadaki2, Nicolas G Clavere3, Filippo Perbellini4, Sian E Harding1, Jonathan A Kirk2, Samuel Y Boateng3, Pieter P de Tombe5, Cesare M Terracciano6.
Abstract
Determining transmural mechanical properties in the heart provides a foundation to understand physiological and pathophysiological cardiac mechanics. Although work on mechanical characterisation has begun in isolated cells and permeabilised samples, the mechanical profile of living individual cardiac layers has not been examined. Myocardial slices are 300 μm-thin sections of heart tissue with preserved cellular stoichiometry, extracellular matrix, and structural architecture. This allows for cardiac mechanics assays in the context of an intact in vitro organotypic preparation. In slices obtained from the subendocardium, midmyocardium and subepicardium of rats, a distinct pattern in transmural contractility is found that is different from that observed in other models. Slices from the epicardium and midmyocardium had a higher active tension and passive tension than the endocardium upon stretch. Differences in total myocyte area coverage, and aspect ratio between layers underlined the functional readouts, while no differences were found in total sarcomeric protein and phosphoprotein between layers. Such intrinsic heterogeneity may orchestrate the normal pumping of the heart in the presence of transmural strain and sarcomere length gradients in the in vivo heart.Entities:
Keywords: Cardiac mechanics; Contractility; Extracellular matrix; Intact tissue; Sarcomeric apparatus; Transmurality
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32201175 PMCID: PMC7246333 DOI: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2020.03.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Mol Cell Cardiol ISSN: 0022-2828 Impact factor: 5.000
Fig. 1A) Transmural strain-sarcomere length (SL) relationship [N = 6]. B) Concentration-force response curves of cardiac slices from different layers to the external Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]o) [N = 8, N = 7, N = 6]. All force-Ca2+ experiments were conducted at 2.1 μm SL. C-Top) Transmural calcium sensitivity as measured by the log(EC50) [N = 5, N = 6, N = 5]. The variable slope concentration-response model fitted did not yield an EC50 for three endocardial, one midmyocardial, and one epicardial data sets. C-Bottom) Hill coefficients of the concentration-response curves of each cardiac layer [N = 7, N = 7, N = 5]. The variable slope concentration-response model fitted yielded an ambiguous slope for one endocardial, and one epicardial data set. D) Active tension-SL relationship for cardiac slices from different layers of the wall [N = 7, N = 5, N = 7]. E) Slopes of linear regression lines fit to the active tension-SL relationship [N = 7, N = 5, N = 7]. F) Representative confocal images of cardiomyocyte area, density, morphology, and direction. Each image in the bottom panel has been separated into three regions and the major direction of cardiomyocyte orientation drawn with an arrow. The greater the angle between the arrows the greater the variability in cardiomyocyte orientation. G) Cardiomyocyte area [N = 180/5, N = 216/6, N = 216/6]. H) Total myocyte area coverage (myocyte area × number of cardiomyocytes) [N = 15/5, N = 18/6, N = 18/6]. I) Cardiomyocyte aspect ratio [N = 180/5, N = 216/6, N = 216/6]. J) Cardiomyocyte dispersion [N = 15/5, N = 18/6, N = 18/6]. All analysis was done blinded. *: midmyocardium vs. endocardium, ^: epicardium vs. endocardium, #: midmyocardium vs. epicardium. [N = endocardium, midmyocardium, endocardium, and N = images/biological replicates].
Fig. 2A-C) Ratio of phosphorylated myosin binding protein C, troponin I, and troponin C & myosin light chain to unphosphorylated counterparts respectively [N = 4]. D) Bands from total sarcomeric content (right) and phosphoproteins (left) separated by molecular weight. E) Passive tension-SL relationship for cardiac slices from different layers of the wall [N = 7, N = 5, N = 7]. F) % Area covered by Sirius red staining from transverse cryosections [N = 6]. G) Representative brightfield images of Sirius red staining.*: midmyocardium vs. endocardium, ^: epicardium vs. endocardium. [N = endocardium, midmyocardium, endocardium]. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)