Literature DB >> 32200222

Are tumour grade and tumour budding equivalent in colorectal cancer? A retrospective analysis of 771 patients.

Inti Zlobec1, Heather E Dawson2, Annika Blank2, John-Melle Bokhorst3, Martin D Berger4, Iris D Nagtegaal3, Alessandro Lugli2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tumour grade is traditionally considered in the management of patients with colorectal cancer. However, a large body of literature suggests that a related feature, namely tumour budding, may have a more important clinical impact. The aim of our study is to determine the correlation between tumour grade and tumour budding and their impact on patient outcome.
METHODS: A retrospective collective of 771 patients with colorectal cancer were included in the study. Clinicopathological information included tumour grade (World Health Organisation 2010; G1, G2 and G3) and tumour budding evaluated as BD1, BD2 and BD3 and representing 0-4 buds, 5-9 buds and 10 or more buds per 0.785 mm2, respectively.
RESULTS: Tumour grade and tumour budding were correlated (p < 0.0001, percent concordance: 33.8%). Of the BD1 cases, 18.1% were of G3. Only two BD3 cases were G1. Both high tumour grade and tumour budding were associated with higher pT, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis and lymphatic and venous vessel invasion (p < 0.01, all), but only tumour grade was additionally associated with right-sided tumour location and mucinous histology. Higher tumour budding led to worse overall (p = 0.0286) and disease-free survival (p = 0.001), but tumour grade did not. Budding was independent of tumour grade in multivariate analysis. DISCUSSION: Tumour grade and tumour budding are distinct features, as recognised by their different clinicopathological associations, reflecting different underlying biological processes. Nonetheless, tumour budding seems to outperform tumour grade in terms of predicting disease-free survival.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer; Prognosis; Tumour budding; Tumour grade

Year:  2020        PMID: 32200222     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  3 in total

Review 1.  Tumour budding is a novel marker in breast cancer: the clinical application and future prospects.

Authors:  Ting Huang; Hui Bao; Yu-Hua Meng; Jian-Lin Zhu; Xiao-Dong Chu; Xiao-Li Chu; Jing-Hua Pan
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 5.348

2.  Post-neoadjuvant assessment of tumour budding according to ITBCC subgroups delivers stage- and regression-grade independent prognostic information in intestinal-type gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Moritz Jesinghaus; Anna-Lina Herz; Meike Kohlruss; Miguel Silva; Albert Grass; Sebastian Lange; Alexander Novotny; Katja Ott; Thomas Schmidt; Matthias Gaida; Alexander Hapfelmeier; Carsten Denkert; Wilko Weichert; Gisela Keller
Journal:  J Pathol Clin Res       Date:  2022-06-17

Review 3.  [Tumor budding in colorectal cancer-Information for clinical use and instructions for practical evaluation].

Authors:  Felix Müller; Alessandro Lugli; Heather Dawson
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 1.011

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.