Ville Nurminen1, Rahul Raj2, Jussi Numminen3, Riku Kivisaari2, Mika Niemelä2, Martin Lehecka2. 1. Neurosurgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. Electronic address: ville.nurminen@hus.fi. 2. Neurosurgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. 3. Radiology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Flow diversion is a popular technique used to treat ordinary small, as well as complex internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms. We describe aneurysm occlusion rates, complications and patient outcomes in patients with ICA aneurysms treated with flow diverter stents. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified all consecutive patients with ICA aneurysms that were treated with flow diverter stents between 2014 and 2019 at our institution. We divided the aneurysms into two anatomic subgroups (cavernous and supraclinoid segments). All the imaging studies and medical records were reviewed for relevant features in relation to aneurysms, complications and patient outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 62 patients with 76 ICA aneurysms (72 unruptured; 4 ruptured) were treated with 70 flow diversion procedures, including six re-treatments. Complete aneurysm occlusion was achieved in 61 % of patients at 6-month follow-up (cavernous 69 %, supraclinoid 58 %), and in 69 % at the latest follow-up (mean of 18 months). Postprocedural intracranial ischemia or hemorrhage was seen in 24 % of patients, including two aneurysm ruptures after flow diversion, and related major long-term functional decline or mortality was seen in 6% of patients. Preprocedural dysfunction of extraocular muscles or vision disturbance improved moderately at best (40-60 %). At the latest follow-up, 54 patients (87 %) were functionally independent (mRS ≤2). CONCLUSION: Flow diversion for cavernous and supraclinoid ICA aneurysms demonstrated acceptable results, but complex aneurysm features cause uncertainty in predicting aneurysm occlusion probability. Patients should be informed of the non-negligible rate of complications, and of only moderate improvement rate of cranial nerve dysfunctions.
OBJECTIVE: Flow diversion is a popular technique used to treat ordinary small, as well as complex internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms. We describe aneurysm occlusion rates, complications and patient outcomes in patients with ICA aneurysms treated with flow diverter stents. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified all consecutive patients with ICA aneurysms that were treated with flow diverter stents between 2014 and 2019 at our institution. We divided the aneurysms into two anatomic subgroups (cavernous and supraclinoid segments). All the imaging studies and medical records were reviewed for relevant features in relation to aneurysms, complications and patient outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 62 patients with 76 ICA aneurysms (72 unruptured; 4 ruptured) were treated with 70 flow diversion procedures, including six re-treatments. Complete aneurysm occlusion was achieved in 61 % of patients at 6-month follow-up (cavernous 69 %, supraclinoid 58 %), and in 69 % at the latest follow-up (mean of 18 months). Postprocedural intracranial ischemia or hemorrhage was seen in 24 % of patients, including two aneurysm ruptures after flow diversion, and related major long-term functional decline or mortality was seen in 6% of patients. Preprocedural dysfunction of extraocular muscles or vision disturbance improved moderately at best (40-60 %). At the latest follow-up, 54 patients (87 %) were functionally independent (mRS ≤2). CONCLUSION: Flow diversion for cavernous and supraclinoid ICA aneurysms demonstrated acceptable results, but complex aneurysm features cause uncertainty in predicting aneurysm occlusion probability. Patients should be informed of the non-negligible rate of complications, and of only moderate improvement rate of cranial nerve dysfunctions.
Authors: Michael Karl Fehrenbach; Eric Dietel; Tim Wende; Johannes Kasper; Caroline Sander; Florian Wilhelmy; Ulf Quaeschling; Juergen Meixensberger; Ulf Nestler Journal: Brain Sci Date: 2022-02-28