Literature DB >> 32199096

Timing of high-efficacy therapy for multiple sclerosis: a retrospective observational cohort study.

Anna He1, Bernd Merkel1, James William L Brown2, Lana Zhovits Ryerson3, Ilya Kister3, Charles B Malpas1, Sifat Sharmin1, Dana Horakova4, Eva Kubala Havrdova4, Tim Spelman5, Guillermo Izquierdo6, Sara Eichau6, Maria Trojano7, Alessandra Lugaresi8, Raymond Hupperts9, Patrizia Sola10, Diana Ferraro10, Jan Lycke11, Francois Grand'Maison12, Alexandre Prat13, Marc Girard13, Pierre Duquette13, Catherine Larochelle13, Anders Svenningsson14, Thor Petersen15, Pierre Grammond16, Franco Granella17, Vincent Van Pesch18, Roberto Bergamaschi19, Christopher McGuigan20, Alasdair Coles21, Jan Hillert5, Fredrik Piehl5, Helmut Butzkueven22, Tomas Kalincik23.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High-efficacy therapies in multiple sclerosis are traditionally used after unsuccessful treatment with first-line disease modifying therapies. We hypothesised that early commencement of high-efficacy therapy would be associated with reduced long-term disability. We therefore aimed to compare long-term disability outcomes between patients who started high-efficacy therapies within 2 years of disease onset with those who started 4-6 years after disease onset.
METHODS: In this retrospective international observational study, we obtained data from the MSBase registry and the Swedish MS registry, which prospectively collect patient data that are specific to multiple sclerosis as part of routine clinical care. We identified adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, with at least 6 years of follow-up since disease onset, and who started the high-efficacy therapy (rituximab, ocrelizumab, mitoxantrone, alemtuzumab, or natalizumab) either 0-2 years (early) or 4-6 years (late) after clinical disease onset. We matched patients in the early and late groups using propensity scores calculated on the basis of their baseline clinical and demographic data. The primary outcome was disability, measured with the Expanded Disability Status Score (EDSS; an ordinal scale of 0-10, with higher scores indicating increased disability), at 6-10 years after disease onset, assessed with a linear mixed-effects model.
FINDINGS: We identified 6149 patients in the MSBase registry who had been given high-efficacy therapy, with data collected between Jan 1, 1975, and April 13, 2017, and 2626 patients in the Swedish MS Registry, with data collected between Dec 10, 1997, and Sept 16, 2019. Of whom, 308 in the MSBase registry and 236 in the Swedish MS registry were eligible for inclusion. 277 (51%) of 544 patients commenced therapy early and 267 (49%) commenced therapy late. For the primary analysis, we matched 213 patients in the early treatment group with 253 in the late treatment group. At baseline, the mean EDSS score was 2·2 (SD 1·2) in the early group and 2·1 (SD 1·2) in the late group. Median follow-up time for matched patients was 7·8 years (IQR 6·7-8·9). In the sixth year after disease onset, the mean EDSS score was 2·2 (SD 1·6) in the early group compared with 2·9 (SD 1·8) in the late group (p<0·0001). This difference persisted throughout each year of follow-up until the tenth year after disease onset (mean EDSS score 2·3 [SD 1·8] vs 3·5 [SD 2·1]; p<0·0001), with a difference between groups of -0·98 (95% CI -1·51 to -0·45; p<0·0001, adjusted for proportion of time on any disease-modifying therapy) across the 6-10 year follow-up period.
INTERPRETATION: High-efficacy therapy commenced within 2 years of disease onset is associated with less disability after 6-10 years than when commenced later in the disease course. This finding can inform decisions regarding optimal sequence and timing of multiple sclerosis therapy. FUNDING: National Health and Medical Research Council Australia and MS Society UK.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32199096     DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30067-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Neurol        ISSN: 1474-4422            Impact factor:   44.182


  53 in total

1.  Commentary: The Multiple Sclerosis Controversy: Is It Escalation or Induction High Efficacy?

Authors:  Patricia K Coyle
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 2.  The immunology of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Kathrine E Attfield; Lise Torp Jensen; Max Kaufmann; Manuel A Friese; Lars Fugger
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 53.106

Review 3.  Rituximab for people with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Graziella Filippini; Jera Kruja; Cinzia Del Giovane
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-11-08

Review 4.  Mechanism-based criteria to improve therapeutic outcomes in progressive multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Heather Y F Yong; V Wee Yong
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 42.937

5.  Effect of Disease-Modifying Therapy on Disability in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Over 15 Years.

Authors:  Tomas Kalincik; Ibrahima Diouf; Sifat Sharmin; Charles Malpas; Tim Spelman; Dana Horakova; Eva Kubala Havrdova; Maria Trojano; Guillermo Izquierdo; Alessandra Lugaresi; Alexandre Prat; Marc Girard; Pierre Duquette; Pierre Grammond; Vilija Jokubaitis; Anneke van der Walt; Francois Grand'Maison; Patrizia Sola; Diana Ferraro; Vahid Shaygannejad; Raed Alroughani; Raymond Hupperts; Murat Terzi; Cavit Boz; Jeannette Lechner-Scott; Eugenio Pucci; Vincent Van Pesch; Franco Granella; Roberto Bergamaschi; Daniele Spitaleri; Mark Slee; Steve Vucic; Radek Ampapa; Pamela McCombe; Cristina Ramo-Tello; Julie Prevost; Javier Olascoaga; Edgardo Cristiano; Michael Barnett; Maria Laura Saladino; Jose Luis Sanchez-Menoyo; Suzanne Hodgkinson; Csilla Rozsa; Stella Hughes; Fraser Moore; Cameron Shaw; Ernest Butler; Olga Skibina; Orla Gray; Allan Kermode; Tunde Csepany; Bhim Singhal; Neil Shuey; Imre Piroska; Bruce Taylor; Magdolna Simo; Carmen-Adella Sirbu; Attila Sas; Helmut Butzkueven
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  Long-term disability trajectories in relapsing multiple sclerosis patients treated with early intensive or escalation treatment strategies.

Authors:  Pietro Iaffaldano; Giuseppe Lucisano; Francesca Caputo; Damiano Paolicelli; Francesco Patti; Mauro Zaffaroni; Vincenzo Brescia Morra; Carlo Pozzilli; Giovanna De Luca; Matilde Inglese; Giuseppe Salemi; Giorgia Teresa Maniscalco; Eleonora Cocco; Patrizia Sola; Giacomo Lus; Antonella Conte; Maria Pia Amato; Franco Granella; Claudio Gasperini; Paolo Bellantonio; Rocco Totaro; Marco Rovaris; Marco Salvetti; Valentina Liliana Adriana Torri Clerici; Roberto Bergamaschi; Davide Maimone; Elio Scarpini; Marco Capobianco; Giancarlo Comi; Massimo Filippi; Maria Trojano
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 6.570

Review 7.  Early Aggressive Treatment Approaches for Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Alexandra Simpson; Ellen M Mowry; Scott D Newsome
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 3.598

8.  Early High Efficacy Treatment in Multiple Sclerosis Is the Best Predictor of Future Disease Activity Over 1 and 2 Years in a Norwegian Population-Based Registry.

Authors:  Cecilia Smith Simonsen; Heidi Øyen Flemmen; Line Broch; Cathrine Brunborg; Pål Berg-Hansen; Stine Marit Moen; Elisabeth Gulowsen Celius
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 4.003

9.  Predicting Aggressive Multiple Sclerosis With Intrathecal IgM Synthesis Among Patients With a Clinically Isolated Syndrome.

Authors:  Enric Monreal; Susana Sainz de la Maza; Lucienne Costa-Frossard; Paulette Walo-Delgado; Javier Zamora; José Ignacio Fernández-Velasco; Noelia Villarrubia; Mercedes Espiño; Daniel Lourido; Paloma Lapuente; Inmaculada Toboso; José Carlos Álvarez-Cermeño; Jaime Masjuan; Luisa María Villar
Journal:  Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm       Date:  2021-07-22

Review 10.  Current and emerging disease-modulatory therapies and treatment targets for multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  F Piehl
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2020-12-20       Impact factor: 8.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.