Literature DB >> 32198902

Prevalence of negative sliding sign representing pouch of Douglas obliteration during pelvic transvaginal ultrasound for any indication.

M Leonardi1, W P Martins2,3, M Espada1, E Georgousopoulou4, G Condous1,5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Pouch of Douglas (POD) obliteration can be predicted with a high degree of certainty and reproducibility using the dynamic transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) sliding-sign technique. So far, studies on POD obliteration prediction have focused on tertiary-care populations with high prevalence of endometriosis; however, POD obliteration may exist in individuals with asymptomatic endometriosis or other conditions. Our primary aim was to determine the prevalence of a negative sliding sign, representing POD obliteration, in a cohort of patients undergoing TVS for any gynecological indication.
METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of consecutive women with an indication for gynecological TVS, conducted at a high-volume ultrasound practice between July and August 2018. Clinical and surgical history, indication for TVS and TVS findings were documented. The prevalence of TVS-confirmed POD obliteration, determined by interpretation of the sliding sign, was calculated for the entire cohort and for the subgroups of women with and without risk factors for endometriosis. High risk for endometriosis was defined as having (1) a TVS referral for endometriosis-like pelvic pain or endometriosis specifically and/or (2) clinical symptoms or signs suggestive of endometriosis. Low risk was defined as the absence of these characteristics.
RESULTS: During the study period, 1043 consecutive women underwent TVS. After excluding those who underwent transabdominal ultrasound, had a history of hysterectomy or with missing data, 909 women were analyzed. The prevalence of a negative sliding sign in the entire cohort was 47/909 (5.2%). A negative sliding sign was observed in 22/639 (3.4%) women with a low risk for endometriosis and 25/243 (10.3%) of those with a high risk for endometriosis (difference in proportions, 6.9% (95% CI 2.8-10.9%); P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated an overall prevalence of a negative sliding sign, suggesting POD obliteration, of 5.2% (or 1/20) in women seeking TVS for a gynecological indication. The prevalence of negative sliding sign in low-risk women is not negligible (3.4% or 1/29 women). These women are most likely to have asymptomatic endometriosis or another important etiology of POD obliteration. The prevalence of a negative sliding sign is approximately three-times higher in women with signs and/or symptoms of endometriosis (10.3% vs 3.4%).
Copyright © 2020 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Copyright © 2020 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  endometriosis; pelvic adhesions; pelvic pain; population health; pouch of Douglas obliteration; sliding sign; surgical planning

Year:  2020        PMID: 32198902     DOI: 10.1002/uog.22023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  3 in total

1.  How long does a transvaginal ultrasound examination for endometriosis take in comparison to a routine transvaginal ultrasound examination?

Authors:  Alison Deslandes; Nayana Parange; Jessie T Childs; Brooke Osborne; Catrina Panuccio; Anthea Croft; Eva Bezak
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2021-12-05

2.  Reliability of the application of transvaginal color Doppler ultrasound in the identification of pelvic tumors in women of childbearing age.

Authors:  Mingchun Zhi; Miaoqian Wang; Wei Li; Lijie Ma; Qian Liu; Ye Li; Qiubo Lv
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-12

3.  Deep learning to diagnose pouch of Douglas obliteration with ultrasound sliding sign.

Authors:  Gabriel Maicas; Mathew Leonardi; Jodie Avery; Catrina Panuccio; Gustavo Carneiro; M Louise Hull; George Condous
Journal:  Reprod Fertil       Date:  2021-08-25
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.