Vijitha S Vempuluru1, Saumya Jakati2, Rashmi Krishnamurthy3, Sirisha Senthil3, Swathi Kaliki4. 1. Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery and Ocular Oncology Services, The Operation Eyesight Universal Institute for Eye Cancer, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, 500034, India. 2. Ophthalmic Pathology Laboratory, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India. 3. VST Centre for Glaucoma Care, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India. 4. Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery and Ocular Oncology Services, The Operation Eyesight Universal Institute for Eye Cancer, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, 500034, India. kalikiswathi@yahoo.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To discuss the clinical presentation and management of intraocular tumors masquerading as primary glaucoma or non-tumor-related secondary glaucoma. METHODS: Retrospective chart review. RESULTS: Ten patients with unsuspected intraocular tumor were referred to glaucoma clinic with a diagnosis of primary glaucoma or non-tumor-related secondary glaucoma. The mean age at referral was 25 years (median, 22 years; range, 1 day to 58 years). Referral diagnosis included neovascular glaucoma (n = 6), congenital glaucoma (n = 3), and angle-closure glaucoma (n = 1). The significant clinical signs included corneal edema (n = 3), megalocornea (n = 3), iris neovascularization (n = 4), hyphema (n = 2), and pseudohypopyon (n = 2). The mean interval between the onset of symptoms and the establishment of accurate diagnosis was 4 months (median, 3 months; range, 0.5-13 months). Two patients underwent inadvertent trabeculectomy, and one patient underwent evisceration prior to definitive diagnosis. The final diagnosis included uveal melanocytoma (n = 2), ciliary body medulloepithelioma (n = 2), choroidal melanoma (n = 2), retinoblastoma (n = 1), retinal capillary hemangioblastoma (n = 1), choroidal schwannoma (n = 1), and uveal metastasis (n = 1). The treatment modalities included plaque radiotherapy (n = 1), enucleation (n = 6), palliative systemic chemotherapy (n = 1), a combination of enucleation, systemic chemotherapy, and external beam radiotherapy (n = 1), and one patient was lost to follow-up. There was no evidence of death over a mean follow-up period of 13 months (median, 5 months; range, 2 weeks to 7 years). CONCLUSION: Unilateral raised intraocular pressure, iris neovascularization, or both may be the presenting features of intraocular tumors. High degree of suspicion and a thorough examination reveals the definitive diagnosis.
PURPOSE: To discuss the clinical presentation and management of intraocular tumors masquerading as primary glaucoma or non-tumor-related secondary glaucoma. METHODS: Retrospective chart review. RESULTS: Ten patients with unsuspected intraocular tumor were referred to glaucoma clinic with a diagnosis of primary glaucoma or non-tumor-related secondary glaucoma. The mean age at referral was 25 years (median, 22 years; range, 1 day to 58 years). Referral diagnosis included neovascular glaucoma (n = 6), congenital glaucoma (n = 3), and angle-closure glaucoma (n = 1). The significant clinical signs included corneal edema (n = 3), megalocornea (n = 3), iris neovascularization (n = 4), hyphema (n = 2), and pseudohypopyon (n = 2). The mean interval between the onset of symptoms and the establishment of accurate diagnosis was 4 months (median, 3 months; range, 0.5-13 months). Two patients underwent inadvertent trabeculectomy, and one patient underwent evisceration prior to definitive diagnosis. The final diagnosis included uveal melanocytoma (n = 2), ciliary body medulloepithelioma (n = 2), choroidal melanoma (n = 2), retinoblastoma (n = 1), retinal capillary hemangioblastoma (n = 1), choroidal schwannoma (n = 1), and uveal metastasis (n = 1). The treatment modalities included plaque radiotherapy (n = 1), enucleation (n = 6), palliative systemic chemotherapy (n = 1), a combination of enucleation, systemic chemotherapy, and external beam radiotherapy (n = 1), and one patient was lost to follow-up. There was no evidence of death over a mean follow-up period of 13 months (median, 5 months; range, 2 weeks to 7 years). CONCLUSION: Unilateral raised intraocular pressure, iris neovascularization, or both may be the presenting features of intraocular tumors. High degree of suspicion and a thorough examination reveals the definitive diagnosis.
Authors: Mihai Adrian Păsărică; Paul Filip Curcă; Christiana Diana Maria Dragosloveanu; Cătălina Ioana Tătaru; Ioana Roxana Manole; Gabriela Elisabeta Murgoi; Alexandru Călin Grigorescu Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2022-05-25