| Literature DB >> 32198408 |
Mojgan Sanjari1, Zeinab Kordestani2, Moeinadin Safavi3, Mahdieh Mashrouteh4, Maryam FekriSoofiAbadi5, Amirfarhad Ghaseminejad Tafreshi6.
Abstract
A direct association has been shown between Cyclin D1 and C-myc gene expressions and the proliferation of human thyroid tumor cells. Our previous study showed that increased β catenin led to a reduction in disease-free probability in patients with papillary thyroid cancer. This study was designed to investigate Cyclin D1 and C-myc genes as targets for β catenin function in PTC and to determine the association between genes expression and staging, recurrence, metastasis, and disease-free survival of PTC. This study was conducted via a thorough investigation of available data from medical records as well as paraffin blocks of 77 out of 400 patients over a 10-year period. Cyclin D1 and C-myc gene expression levels were measured using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate disease-free survival. Higher levels of Cyclin D1 and C-myc gene expressions were observed in patients with recurrence by 8.5 (P = 0.004) and 19.5 (p = 0.0001) folds, respectively. A significant positive correlation was found between Cyclin D1 expression and the cumulative dose of radioactive iodine received by patients (r = -0.2, p value = 0.03). The ten-year survival rate in the patients included in this study was 98.25% while disease-free survival was 48.1%. Higher Cyclin D1 and C-myc gene expression levels were observed in patients with recurrence/distant metastasis. Inversely, lower expression of Cyclin D1 and C-myc genes were associated with better survival of patients (SD, 0.142-0.052) (Mantel-Cox test, P = 0.002). The enhancement of Cyclin D1 and C-myc gene expression may be a potential mechanism for recurrence and aggressiveness of PTC.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32198408 PMCID: PMC7083882 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-61985-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Descriptive Analysis of Patient Characteristics.
| Variables | result |
|---|---|
| Agea (year) | 38.7 ± 14.1 |
| Sex (female)b | 81.8 |
| Expressiona,c | 3.54 ± 4.77 |
| Cyclin D1 | |
| C-myc | 4.74 ± 4.84 |
| Stagesb | |
| I | 70.3 |
| II | 12.5 |
| ≤III | 17.2 |
| Recurrence (Yes)b | 53.2 |
| Metastasisb | |
| None | 74.2 |
| Lymphatic | 16.7 |
| Distance | 9.1 |
| Radioactive Iodine treatmentb | |
| One time | 58 |
| Two times | 18.8 |
| Three times | 14.5 |
| Four times | 8.7 |
| Radioactive Iodine dosagea (mCi)* | 241.73 ± 178.89 |
| Follow up time(months)a | 102.5 ± 40.4 |
aMean ± SD.
bPercent.
cCycle threshold (ΔCT) values are presented in this table to represent Cyclin D1,C-myc expression levels in tumors.
ΔCT = Cyclin D1, C-myc CT – β-actin CT.
Association of CyclinD1 and C-myc gene expression with other variables.
| Variables | CyclinD1 expression*,a | Fold changeb | P value | C-myc expression*,a | Fold changeb | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex* | ||||||
| Male | 0.175 ± 0.66 | 0.2 | 0.169 ± 0.66 | 0.5 | ||
| Female | 0.222 ± 0.833 | 0.2 ± 0.833 | ||||
| Recurrence* | ||||||
| Yes | 0.5 ± 0.256 | 8.5 (yes vs. no) | 0.004 | 0.37 ± 0.27 | 19.5 (yes vs. no) | <0.0001 |
| No | 0.196 ± 0.196 | 0.14 ± 0.2 | ||||
| Stage* | ||||||
| I | 0.25 ± 0.2 | 2.5 (2 vs. 1) | 0.7 | 0.188 ± 0.21 | 3 (2 vs. 1) | 0.5 |
| II | 0.37 ± 0.166 | 0.2 (3 vs. 2) | 0.263 ± 0.151 | 0.2 (3 vs. 2) | ||
| ≤III | 0.217 ± 0.227 | 0.6 (3 vs. 1) | 0.163 ± 0.243 | 0.5 (3 vs. 1) | ||
| Radioactive Iodine treatment* | ||||||
| One time(1) | 0.212 ± 0.227 | 5.2 (2 vs. 1) | 0.03 | 0.188 ± 0.27 | 6.3 (2 vs. 1) | 0.1 |
| Two time(2) | 0.434 ± 0.243 | 0.3 (3 vs. 2) | 0.384 ± 0.2 | 0.3 (3 vs. 2) | ||
| Three time(3) | 0.263 ± 0.172 | 27 (4 vs. 3) | 0.238 ± 0.14 | 3.2 (4 vs. 3) | ||
| Four time(4) | −0.999 ± 0.322 | 52 (4 vs. 1) | 0.4 ± 0.277 | 6.5 (4 vs. 1) | ||
| Radioactive Iodine dosage** | r = −0.4 | <0.0001 | r = −0.4 | <0.0001 | ||
| Metastasis* | ||||||
| None | 0.25 ± 0.227 | 24.2 (d vs. n) | 0.05 | 0.181 ± 0.238 | 6 (d vs. n) | 0.1 |
| Lymphatic(l) | 0.33 ± 0.175 | 2 (l vs. n) | 0.243 ± 0.25 | 3.5 (l vs. n) | ||
| Distance(d) | −1.66 ± 4.2 | 0.345 ± 0.188 | ||||
| C-myc Gene Expression** | r = 0.7 | <0.0001 | ||||
*(mean ± SD).
** Correlation covariate.
a1/ΔCT values are presented in this table to represent CyclinD1 and C-myc expression levels in tumors.
Δ Ct = target gene (Cyclin D1, C-myc) Ct - housekeeping gene (beta-actin) C t.
bfold change = 2−ΔCT CyclinD1,Cmyc /2−ΔCT beta -actin.
P Value is significant at 0.05 levels.
Figure 1(A) ROC curve of CyclinD1 gene expression for recurrence diagnosis. (B) ROC curve of C-myc gene expression for recurrence diagnosis. We designed an ROC curve to determine a cutoff point for Cyclin D1 and C-myc gene expression as a way to predict the probability of recurrence. Area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 32% for CyclinD1 (A) and 24% for C-myc (B), which were both below the 50% standard reference line (the reference line is colored in green). Given that the test accuracy is below the 50% cut off point for expression of both genes, recurrence probability could not be adequately and reliably evaluated (A,B).
Figure 2Disease-free survival plot for recurrence of PTC. Kaplan-Meier method was applied in order to determine disease-free survival of patients as recurrence of their disease. Mean and median of the time difference between baseline and follow up were between 108.8 (95% CI: 99.5–118.2) and 140 (95% CI: 134.1–145.8) months, respectively.
Characteristics of the categorized CyclinD1, C-myc gene expression.
| Gene | Category | number | Percentile | Min – Max* | Mean ± SD* | Mean of follow up time(months) | 95% CI of follow up time(months) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CyclinD1 | 1 | 29 | 33.3 | 0.1–1 | −1 ± 0.5 | 91.6 | 76.1–107.2 |
| 2 | 26 | 66.6 | 0.2–0.5 | 0.3 ± 0.9 | 110.4 | 93.0–127.8 | |
| 3 | 22 | 99.9 | 0.05–0.1 | 0.1 ± 0.3 | 128.7 | 117.3–140.1 | |
| C- myc | 1 | 29 | 33.3 | 0.1–0.3 | −0.03 ± 0.3 | 93.0 | 77.0–109.1 |
| 2 | 23 | 66.6 | 0.1–0.2 | 0.2 ± 1.2 | 105.7 | 89.2–122.2 | |
| 3 | 25 | 99.9 | 0.06–0.1 | 0.1 ± 0.3 | 129.7 | 116.2–143.3 |
*1/ΔCT values are presented in this table.
Figure 3(A) Disease-free survival plot for recurrence of PTC based on Cyclin D1 gene expression. (B) Disease-free survival plot for recurrence of PTC based on C-myc gene expression. We found that better survival of patients (lower recurrence) was associated with lower Cyclin D1 (Mantel-cox test, P = 0.003) (A) as well as lower C-myc gene expression (Mantel-cox test, P = 0.001) (B).
Multivariate survival analysis (Cox regression analysis) for determinants of recurrence.
| variables | coefficient | P value | Odds ratio (OR) | 95% CI for OR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C-myc Gene expression | −0.1 | 0.007 | 0.89 | 0.83 | 0.97 |
| Iodine dosage | 0.003 | 0.001 | 1.003 | 1.002 | 1.005 |
Correlation between C-myc, Cyclin D and β catenin gene expression.
| Correlations | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C-myc | CyclinD1 | B catenin | ||
| C-myc | Pearson Correlation | 1 | 0.763** | 0.502** |
| N = 77 | P | — | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| cyclin D1 | Pearson Correlation | 0.763** | 1 | 0.501** |
| N = 77 | P | 0.001 | — | 0.001 |
| Β catenin | Pearson Correlation | 0.502** | 0.501** | 1 |
| N = 77 | P | 0.001 | 0.001 | — |
**Correlation is significant at the P ≤ 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Hazard rates of recurrence for each year of follow up.
| Interval start time | Hazard ratio | Standard error of Hazard ratio |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 12 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 24 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 36 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 48 | 0.01 | 0.0 |
| 60 | 0.01 | 0.0 |
| 72 | 0.01 | 0.0 |
| 84 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 96 | 0.01 | 0.0 |
| 108 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 120 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 132 | 0.05 | 0.02 |