Literature DB >> 32198049

Advanced TMS approaches to probe corticospinal excitability during action preparation.

Gerard Derosiere1, Pierre Vassiliadis2, Julie Duque2.   

Abstract

The motor system displays strong changes in neural activity during action preparation. In the past decades, several techniques, including transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), electroencephalography (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), have allowed us to gain insights into the functional role of such preparatory activity in humans. More recently, new TMS tools have been proposed to study the mechanistic principles underlying the changes in corticospinal excitability during action preparation. The aim of the present review is to provide a comprehensive description of these advanced methods and to discuss the new knowledge they give access to, relative to other existing approaches. We start with a brief synthesis of the work that has been achieved so far using classic TMS protocols during action preparation, such as the so-called single-pulse and paired-pulse techniques. We then highlight three new approaches that recently arose in the field of action preparation, including (1) the exploitation of TMS current direction, known as directional TMS, which enables investigating different subsets of neurons in the primary motor cortex, (2) the use of paired-pulse TMS to study the suppressive influence of the cerebellum on corticospinal excitability and (3) the development of a double-coil TMS approach, which facilitates the study of bilateral changes in corticospinal excitability. The aim of the present article is twofold: we seek to provide a comprehensive description of these advanced TMS tools and to discuss their bearings for the field of action preparation with respect to more traditional TMS approaches, as well as to neuroimaging techniques such as EEG or fMRI. Finally, we point out perspectives for fundamental and clinical research that arise from the combination of these methods, widening the horizon of possibilities for the investigation of the human motor system, both in health and disease.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32198049     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116746

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  10 in total

Review 1.  State-dependent effects of neural stimulation on brain function and cognition.

Authors:  Claire Bradley; Abbey S Nydam; Paul E Dux; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 38.755

2.  Hasty sensorimotor decisions rely on an overlap of broad and selective changes in motor activity.

Authors:  Gerard Derosiere; David Thura; Paul Cisek; Julie Duque
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 9.593

Review 3.  Action Selection and Motor Decision Making: Insights from Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Margherita Tecilla; Andrea Guerra; Lorenzo Rocchi; Sara Määttä; Matteo Bologna; Maria Herrojo Ruiz; Roberta Biundo; Angelo Antonini; Florinda Ferreri
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-05-12

Review 4.  Prospects for the application of transcranial magnetic stimulation in diabetic neuropathy.

Authors:  Xi Xu; Dong-Sheng Xu
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 5.135

Review 5.  The Impact of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Reading Processes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  C Nikki Arrington; Alexandra E Ossowski; Humza Baig; Eileen Persichetti; Robin Morris
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 6.940

6.  A TMS study of preparatory suppression in binge drinkers.

Authors:  Julien Grandjean; Julie Duque
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 4.881

7.  A framework to assess the impact of number of trials on the amplitude of motor evoked potentials.

Authors:  Claudia Ammann; Pasqualina Guida; Jaime Caballero-Insaurriaga; José A Pineda-Pardo; Antonio Oliviero; Guglielmo Foffani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  The acute effects of action observation on muscle strength/weakness and corticospinal excitability in older adults.

Authors:  Kylie K Harmon; Ryan M Girts; Jason I Pagan; Gabriela Rodriguez; Matt S Stock
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 2.064

9.  Unexpected Sounds Nonselectively Inhibit Active Visual Stimulus Representations.

Authors:  Cheol Soh; Jan R Wessel
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Preparing to React: A Behavioral Study on the Interplay between Proactive and Reactive Action Inhibition.

Authors:  Stefania C Ficarella; Andrea Desantis; Alexandre Zénon; Boris Burle
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-05-22
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.