Haluk Celik1, Aakash Chauhan2, Cesar Flores-Hernandez3, Erik Dorthe3, Darryl D'Lima3, Heinz Hoenecke2. 1. Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA, USA; Shiley Center for Orthopaedic Research & Education (SCORE) at Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA, USA. Electronic address: drhalukcelik@gmail.com. 2. Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA, USA; Shiley Center for Orthopaedic Research & Education (SCORE) at Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA, USA. 3. Shiley Center for Orthopaedic Research & Education (SCORE) at Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The variation in the anatomic relationship between the coracoid and the clavicle affects the biomechanical stability of coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction (CCLR). METHODS: Three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction of 85 patients was analyzed. Anatomic landmarks were used to derive the coracoclavicular sagittal reconstruction angle (sRA). The lateral concave angle, which indicated the shape of the distal clavicle, and the offsets between the clavicle and coracoid were also measured. To investigate the biomechanical effects of the sRA on CCLR, 7 computed tomography scans with different sRAs were 3D printed. Two reconstructions, a single trans-coracoclavicular tunnel and a looped reconstruction technique, were performed sequentially. Models were cyclically loaded at 70 N in the anterior, posterior, and superior directions. RESULTS: The mean sRA was 68° ± 9.3° (range, 47°-85°). The superoinferior offset between the clavicle and the coracoid and the lateral concave angle positively correlated with the sRA (r = 0.359 and 0.837, respectively; P ≤ .001), whereas the anteroposterior offset had a negative correlation (r = -0.925; P < .001). The sRA had a negative correlation with the anterior displacement of the clavicle (rho = -0.96; P < .001) and a positive correlation with the posterior displacement for both surgical techniques (rho = 1.0; P < .001). CONCLUSION: The anatomic orientation of the native coracoclavicular ligaments is highly variable in the sagittal plane. Low sagittal angles can reduce anterior stability, whereas high sagittal angles can reduce posterior stability of CCLR.
BACKGROUND: The variation in the anatomic relationship between the coracoid and the clavicle affects the biomechanical stability of coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction (CCLR). METHODS: Three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction of 85 patients was analyzed. Anatomic landmarks were used to derive the coracoclavicular sagittal reconstruction angle (sRA). The lateral concave angle, which indicated the shape of the distal clavicle, and the offsets between the clavicle and coracoid were also measured. To investigate the biomechanical effects of the sRA on CCLR, 7 computed tomography scans with different sRAs were 3D printed. Two reconstructions, a single trans-coracoclavicular tunnel and a looped reconstruction technique, were performed sequentially. Models were cyclically loaded at 70 N in the anterior, posterior, and superior directions. RESULTS: The mean sRA was 68° ± 9.3° (range, 47°-85°). The superoinferior offset between the clavicle and the coracoid and the lateral concave angle positively correlated with the sRA (r = 0.359 and 0.837, respectively; P ≤ .001), whereas the anteroposterior offset had a negative correlation (r = -0.925; P < .001). The sRA had a negative correlation with the anterior displacement of the clavicle (rho = -0.96; P < .001) and a positive correlation with the posterior displacement for both surgical techniques (rho = 1.0; P < .001). CONCLUSION: The anatomic orientation of the native coracoclavicular ligaments is highly variable in the sagittal plane. Low sagittal angles can reduce anterior stability, whereas high sagittal angles can reduce posterior stability of CCLR.