| Literature DB >> 32197665 |
Drew Pratt1, Martha Quezado2, Zied Abdullaev2, Debra Hawes3, Fusheng Yang3, Hugh J L Garton4, Alexander R Judkins3, Rajen Mody5, Arul Chinnaiyan1,6, Kenneth Aldape2, Carl Koschmann7,8, Sriram Venneti9,10.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32197665 PMCID: PMC7083001 DOI: 10.1186/s40478-020-00905-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Neuropathol Commun ISSN: 2051-5960 Impact factor: 7.801
Fig. 1Representative MRI characteristics. T1-weighted sagittal image showed an infiltrative mass centered within and expanding the pons (a). The exophytic portion of the tumor is seen encasing the basilar artery (b). The mass demonstrated classic MR characteristics of DIPG including increased T2 (c) and FLAIR (d) signals, and lack of post contrast enhancement (e)
Fig. 2Histopathology and results of integrative sequencing and array-based methylation profiling. Routine H&E sections showed a high-grade cellular tumor (a). Tumor cells were seen infiltrating axons (b). H3K27M stain was negative (with appropriate control staining) and H3K27me3 showed loss with expression in admixed non-neoplastic cells (c, d). Copy number profiling through MI-ONCOSEQ mainly showed whole-arm changes including gains in 1q, 7p, 17p, and losses of 13q and partial 13p (e). Gene expression (RNA-seq) showed high expression of EZHIP (CXorf67) (f, expression is presented as log-transformed fragments per kilobase of exon model per million reads mapped, or FPKM, and shown as a percentile rank among the MI-ONCOSEQ compendium). Immunohistochemistry confirmed EZHIP protein overexpression and loss of Olig2 in tumor cells (f). Reproduction of the unsupervised clustering analysis of reference and diagnostic cohorts by Capper et al. [3] using t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE), with incorporation of the presented case (g). Reproduction of the Consensus Clustering analysis by Pajtler et al. [11] and incorporation of our case showing clustering with the PFA-1c subtype (h). Heatmap representation and clustering were performed identically to the previously published methods [11]. Illustration of the previously defined [11] Consensus Clustering-based PFA major subgroups and minor subtypes (n = 675) using t-SNE dimensionality reduction (i); arrowhead denotes placement of the current case. Scale bars = 40 μm