Literature DB >> 32197580

Standard machine learning approaches outperform deep representation learning on phenotype prediction from transcriptomics data.

Aaron M Smith1, Jonathan R Walsh2, John Long3, Craig B Davis4, Peter Henstock5, Martin R Hodge6, Mateusz Maciejewski6, Xinmeng Jasmine Mu7, Stephen Ra3, Shanrong Zhao3, Daniel Ziemek8, Charles K Fisher2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ability to confidently predict health outcomes from gene expression would catalyze a revolution in molecular diagnostics. Yet, the goal of developing actionable, robust, and reproducible predictive signatures of phenotypes such as clinical outcome has not been attained in almost any disease area. Here, we report a comprehensive analysis spanning prediction tasks from ulcerative colitis, atopic dermatitis, diabetes, to many cancer subtypes for a total of 24 binary and multiclass prediction problems and 26 survival analysis tasks. We systematically investigate the influence of gene subsets, normalization methods and prediction algorithms. Crucially, we also explore the novel use of deep representation learning methods on large transcriptomics compendia, such as GTEx and TCGA, to boost the performance of state-of-the-art methods. The resources and findings in this work should serve as both an up-to-date reference on attainable performance, and as a benchmarking resource for further research.
RESULTS: Approaches that combine large numbers of genes outperformed single gene methods consistently and with a significant margin, but neither unsupervised nor semi-supervised representation learning techniques yielded consistent improvements in out-of-sample performance across datasets. Our findings suggest that using l2-regularized regression methods applied to centered log-ratio transformed transcript abundances provide the best predictive analyses overall.
CONCLUSIONS: Transcriptomics-based phenotype prediction benefits from proper normalization techniques and state-of-the-art regularized regression approaches. In our view, breakthrough performance is likely contingent on factors which are independent of normalization and general modeling techniques; these factors might include reduction of systematic errors in sequencing data, incorporation of other data types such as single-cell sequencing and proteomics, and improved use of prior knowledge.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep learning; Machine learning; Molecular diagnostics; Normalization methods; Phenotype prediction; RNA-seq; Representation learning; Transcriptomics

Year:  2020        PMID: 32197580     DOI: 10.1186/s12859-020-3427-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1471-2105            Impact factor:   3.169


  13 in total

Review 1.  A guide to machine learning for biologists.

Authors:  Joe G Greener; Shaun M Kandathil; Lewis Moffat; David T Jones
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 94.444

2.  Bias-invariant RNA-sequencing metadata annotation.

Authors:  Hannes Wartmann; Sven Heins; Karin Kloiber; Stefan Bonn
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 6.524

3.  Assessment of deep learning and transfer learning for cancer prediction based on gene expression data.

Authors:  Blaise Hanczar; Victoria Bourgeais; Farida Zehraoui
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2022-07-03       Impact factor: 3.307

4.  AggMapNet: enhanced and explainable low-sample omics deep learning with feature-aggregated multi-channel networks.

Authors:  Wan Xiang Shen; Yu Liu; Yan Chen; Xian Zeng; Ying Tan; Yu Yang Jiang; Yu Zong Chen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 19.160

5.  Predicting patient response with models trained on cell lines and patient-derived xenografts by nonlinear transfer learning.

Authors:  Soufiane M C Mourragui; Marco Loog; Daniel J Vis; Kat Moore; Anna G Manjon; Mark A van de Wiel; Marcel J T Reinders; Lodewyk F A Wessels
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 12.779

6.  Using predictive machine learning models for drug response simulation by calibrating patient-specific pathway signatures.

Authors:  Sepehr Golriz Khatami; Sarah Mubeen; Vinay Srinivas Bharadhwaj; Alpha Tom Kodamullil; Martin Hofmann-Apitius; Daniel Domingo-Fernández
Journal:  NPJ Syst Biol Appl       Date:  2021-10-27

7.  Improved prediction of smoking status via isoform-aware RNA-seq deep learning models.

Authors:  Zifeng Wang; Aria Masoomi; Zhonghui Xu; Adel Boueiz; Sool Lee; Tingting Zhao; Russell Bowler; Michael Cho; Edwin K Silverman; Craig Hersh; Jennifer Dy; Peter J Castaldi
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 8.  GPCRs Are Optimal Regulators of Complex Biological Systems and Orchestrate the Interface between Health and Disease.

Authors:  Hanne Leysen; Deborah Walter; Bregje Christiaenssen; Romi Vandoren; İrem Harputluoğlu; Nore Van Loon; Stuart Maudsley
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 9.  Machine Learning Modeling from Omics Data as Prospective Tool for Improvement of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Diagnosis and Clinical Classifications.

Authors:  Biljana Stankovic; Nikola Kotur; Gordana Nikcevic; Vladimir Gasic; Branka Zukic; Sonja Pavlovic
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-09-18       Impact factor: 4.096

10.  Ten quick tips for deep learning in biology.

Authors:  Benjamin D Lee; Anthony Gitter; Casey S Greene; Sebastian Raschka; Finlay Maguire; Alexander J Titus; Michael D Kessler; Alexandra J Lee; Marc G Chevrette; Paul Allen Stewart; Thiago Britto-Borges; Evan M Cofer; Kun-Hsing Yu; Juan Jose Carmona; Elana J Fertig; Alexandr A Kalinin; Brandon Signal; Benjamin J Lengerich; Timothy J Triche; Simina M Boca
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.