Literature DB >> 32197076

Rapid, Phase-free Detection of Long Identity-by-Descent Segments Enables Effective Relationship Classification.

Daniel N Seidman1, Sushila A Shenoy2, Minsoo Kim2, Ramya Babu3, Ian G Woods4, Thomas D Dyer5, Donna M Lehman6, Joanne E Curran5, Ravindranath Duggirala5, John Blangero5, Amy L Williams7.   

Abstract

Identity-by-descent (IBD) segments are a useful tool for applications ranging from demographic inference to relationship classification, but most detection methods rely on phasing information and therefore require substantial computation time. As genetic datasets grow, methods for inferring IBD segments that scale well will be critical. We developed IBIS, an IBD detector that locates long regions of allele sharing between unphased individuals, and benchmarked it with Refined IBD, GERMLINE, and TRUFFLE on 3,000 simulated individuals. Phasing these with Beagle 5 takes 4.3 CPU days, followed by either Refined IBD or GERMLINE segment detection in 2.9 or 1.1 h, respectively. By comparison, IBIS finishes in 6.8 min or 7.8 min with IBD2 functionality enabled: speedups of 805-946× including phasing time. TRUFFLE takes 2.6 h, corresponding to IBIS speedups of 20.2-23.3×. IBIS is also accurate, inferring ≥7 cM IBD segments at quality comparable to Refined IBD and GERMLINE. With these segments, IBIS classifies first through third degree relatives in real Mexican American samples at rates meeting or exceeding other methods tested and identifies fourth through sixth degree pairs at rates within 0.0%-2.0% of the top method. While allele frequency-based approaches that do not detect segments can infer relationship degrees faster than IBIS, the fastest are biased in admixed samples, with KING inferring 30.8% fewer fifth degree Mexican American relatives correctly compared with IBIS. Finally, we ran IBIS on chromosome 2 of the UK Biobank dataset and estimate its runtime on the autosomes to be 3.3 days parallelized across 128 cores.
Copyright © 2020 American Society of Human Genetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IBD; identical by descent segments; identity by descent; relatedness inference; unphased genotypes

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32197076      PMCID: PMC7118564          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  42 in total

1.  Model-free Estimation of Recent Genetic Relatedness.

Authors:  Matthew P Conomos; Alexander P Reiner; Bruce S Weir; Timothy A Thornton
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Whole population, genome-wide mapping of hidden relatedness.

Authors:  Alexander Gusev; Jennifer K Lowe; Markus Stoffel; Mark J Daly; David Altshuler; Jan L Breslow; Jeffrey M Friedman; Itsik Pe'er
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Rapid and accurate haplotype phasing and missing-data inference for whole-genome association studies by use of localized haplotype clustering.

Authors:  Sharon R Browning; Brian L Browning
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Inferring Identical-by-Descent Sharing of Sample Ancestors Promotes High-Resolution Relative Detection.

Authors:  Monica D Ramstetter; Sushila A Shenoy; Thomas D Dyer; Donna M Lehman; Joanne E Curran; Ravindranath Duggirala; John Blangero; Jason G Mezey; Amy L Williams
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Identity inference of genomic data using long-range familial searches.

Authors:  Yaniv Erlich; Tal Shor; Itsik Pe'er; Shai Carmi
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets.

Authors:  Christopher C Chang; Carson C Chow; Laurent Cam Tellier; Shashaank Vattikuti; Shaun M Purcell; James J Lee
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 6.524

7.  The Great Migration and African-American Genomic Diversity.

Authors:  Soheil Baharian; Maxime Barakatt; Christopher R Gignoux; Suyash Shringarpure; Jacob Errington; William J Blot; Carlos D Bustamante; Eimear E Kenny; Scott M Williams; Melinda C Aldrich; Simon Gravel
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Benchmarking Relatedness Inference Methods with Genome-Wide Data from Thousands of Relatives.

Authors:  Monica D Ramstetter; Thomas D Dyer; Donna M Lehman; Joanne E Curran; Ravindranath Duggirala; John Blangero; Jason G Mezey; Amy L Williams
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  RaPID: ultra-fast, powerful, and accurate detection of segments identical by descent (IBD) in biobank-scale cohorts.

Authors:  Ardalan Naseri; Xiaoming Liu; Kecong Tang; Shaojie Zhang; Degui Zhi
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  Crossover interference and sex-specific genetic maps shape identical by descent sharing in close relatives.

Authors:  Madison Caballero; Daniel N Seidman; Ying Qiao; Jens Sannerud; Thomas D Dyer; Donna M Lehman; Joanne E Curran; Ravindranath Duggirala; John Blangero; Shai Carmi; Amy L Williams
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  7 in total

1.  Patterns of genetic connectedness between modern and medieval Estonian genomes reveal the origins of a major ancestry component of the Finnish population.

Authors:  Toomas Kivisild; Lehti Saag; Ruoyun Hui; Simone Andrea Biagini; Vasili Pankratov; Eugenia D'Atanasio; Luca Pagani; Lauri Saag; Siiri Rootsi; Reedik Mägi; Ene Metspalu; Heiki Valk; Martin Malve; Kadri Irdt; Tuuli Reisberg; Anu Solnik; Christiana L Scheib; Daniel N Seidman; Amy L Williams; Kristiina Tambets; Mait Metspalu
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Including diverse and admixed populations in genetic epidemiology research.

Authors:  Amke Caliebe; Fasil Tekola-Ayele; Burcu F Darst; Xuexia Wang; Yeunjoo E Song; Jiang Gui; Ronnie A Sebro; David J Balding; Mohamad Saad; Marie-Pierre Dubé
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  Evaluating the Impact of Dropout and Genotyping Error on SNP-Based Kinship Analysis With Forensic Samples.

Authors:  Stephen D Turner; V P Nagraj; Matthew Scholz; Shakeel Jessa; Carlos Acevedo; Jianye Ge; August E Woerner; Bruce Budowle
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Fast and Robust Identity-by-Descent Inference with the Templated Positional Burrows-Wheeler Transform.

Authors:  William A Freyman; Kimberly F McManus; Suyash S Shringarpure; Ethan M Jewett; Katarzyna Bryc; Adam Auton
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  skater: an R package for SNP-based kinship analysis, testing, and evaluation.

Authors:  Stephen D Turner; V P Nagraj; Matthew Scholz; Shakeel Jessa; Carlos Acevedo; Jianye Ge; August E Woerner; Bruce Budowle
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2022-01-07

6.  Fully exploiting SNP arrays: a systematic review on the tools to extract underlying genomic structure.

Authors:  Laura Balagué-Dobón; Alejandro Cáceres; Juan R González
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 11.622

7.  A machine learning approach for missing persons cases with high genotyping errors.

Authors:  Meng Huang; Muyi Liu; Hongmin Li; Jonathan King; Amy Smuts; Bruce Budowle; Jianye Ge
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 4.772

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.