| Literature DB >> 32196400 |
Piyush Parkhey1,2, Aadil Keshaw Ram1,3, Batul Diwan1, J Satya Eswari1, Pratima Gupta1.
Abstract
The present study demonstrates a comparative analysis between the artificial neural network (ANN) and response surface methodology (RSM) as optimization tools for pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic rice straw. The efficacy for both the processes, that is, pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis was evaluated using correlation coefficient (R2) & mean squared error (MSE). The values of R2 obtained by ANN after training, validation, and testing were 1, 0.9005, and 0.997 for pretreatment and 0.962, 0.923, and 0.9941 for enzymatic saccharification, respectively. On the other hand, the R2 values obtained with RSM were 0.9965 for cellulose recovery and 0.9994 for saccharification efficiency. Thus, ANN and RSM together successfully identify the substantial process conditions for rice straw pretreatment and enzymatic saccharification. The percentage of error for ANN and RSM were 0.009 and 0.01 for cellulose recovery and for 0.004 and 0.005 for saccharification efficiency, respectively, which showed the authority of ANN in exemplifying the non-linear behavior of the system.Entities:
Keywords: Artificial neural network; correlation coefficient; enzymatic saccharification; lignocellulose; pretreatment; response surface methodology; rice straw
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32196400 DOI: 10.1080/10826068.2020.1737816
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prep Biochem Biotechnol ISSN: 1082-6068 Impact factor: 2.162