Literature DB >> 32195761

External Validation of PATHFx Version 3.0 in Patients Treated Surgically and Nonsurgically for Symptomatic Skeletal Metastases.

Ashley B Anderson1,2, Rikard Wedin3, Nicola Fabbri4, Patrick Boland4, John Healey4, Jonathan A Forsberg1,2,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: PATHFx is a clinical decision-support tool based on machine learning capable of estimating the likelihood of survival after surgery for patients with skeletal metastases. The applicability of any machine-learning tool depends not only on successful external validation in unique patient populations but also on remaining relevant as more effective systemic treatments are introduced. With advancements in the treatment of metastatic disease, it is our responsibility to patients to ensure clinical support tools remain contemporary and accurate. QUESTION/PURPOSES: Therefore, we sought to (1) generate updated PATHFx models using recent data from patients treated at one large, urban tertiary referral center and (2) externally validate the models using two contemporary patient populations treated either surgically or nonsurgically with external-beam radiotherapy alone for symptomatic skeletal metastases for symptomatic lesions.
METHODS: After obtaining institutional review board approval, we collected data on 208 patients undergoing surgical treatment for pathologic fractures at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between 2015 and 2018. These data were combined with the original PATHFx training set (n = 189) to create the final training set (n = 397). We then created six Bayesian belief networks designed to estimate the likelihood of 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month, 18-month, and 24-month survival after treatment. Bayesian belief analysis is a statistical method that allows data-driven learning to arise from conditional probabilities by exploring relationships between variables to estimate the likelihood of an outcome using observed data. For external validation, we extracted the records of patients treated between 2016 and 2018 from the International Bone Metastasis Registry and records of patients treated nonoperatively with external-beam radiation therapy for symptomatic skeletal metastases from 2012 to 2016 using the Military Health System Data Repository (radiotherapy-only group). From each record, we collected the date of treatment, laboratory values at the time of treatment initiation, demographic data, details of diagnosis, and the date of death. All records reported sufficient follow-up to establish survival (yes/no) at 24-months after treatment. For external validation, we applied the data from each record to the new PATHFx models. We assessed calibration (calibration plots), accuracy (Brier score), discriminatory ability (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC]).
RESULTS: The updated PATHFx version 3.0 models successfully classified survival at each time interval in both external validation sets and demonstrated appropriate discriminatory ability and model calibration. The Bayesian models were reasonably calibrated to the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center training set. External validation with 197 records from the International Bone Metastasis Registry and 192 records from the Military Health System Data Repository for analysis found Brier scores that were all less than 0.20, with upper bounds of the 95% confidence intervals all less than 0.25, both for the radiotherapy-only and International Bone Metastasis Registry groups. Additionally, AUC estimates were all greater than 0.70, with lower bounds of the 95% CI all greater than 0.68, except for the 1-month radiotherapy-only group. To complete external validation, decision curve analysis demonstrated clinical utility. This means it was better to use the PATHFx models when compared to the default assumption that all or no patients would survive at all time periods except for the 1-month models. We believe the favorable Brier scores (< 0.20) as well as DCA indicate these models are suitable for clinical use.
CONCLUSIONS: We successfully updated PATHFx using contemporary data from patients undergoing either surgical or nonsurgical treatment for symptomatic skeletal metastases. These models have been incorporated for clinical use on PATHFx version 3.0 (https://www.pathfx.org). Clinically, external validation suggests it is better to use PATHFx version 3.0 for all time periods except when deciding whether to give radiotherapy to patients with the life expectancy of less than 1 month. This is partly because most patients survived 1-month after treatment. With the advancement of medical technology in treatment and diagnosis for patients with metastatic bone disease, part of our fiduciary responsibility is to the main current clinical support tools. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32195761      PMCID: PMC7282571          DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.755


  13 in total

1.  Toward evidence-based medical statistics. 2: The Bayes factor.

Authors:  S N Goodman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1999-06-15       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Can We Estimate Short- and Intermediate-term Survival in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Metastatic Bone Disease?

Authors:  Jonathan A Forsberg; Rikard Wedin; Patrick J Boland; John H Healey
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Elena B Elkin
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Can A Multivariate Model for Survival Estimation in Skeletal Metastases (PATHFx) Be Externally Validated Using Japanese Patients?

Authors:  Koichi Ogura; Tabu Gokita; Yusuke Shinoda; Hirotaka Kawano; Tatsuya Takagi; Keisuke Ae; Akira Kawai; Rikard Wedin; Jonathan A Forsberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  First-Line Atezolizumab plus Chemotherapy in Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Leora Horn; Aaron S Mansfield; Aleksandra Szczęsna; Libor Havel; Maciej Krzakowski; Maximilian J Hochmair; Florian Huemer; György Losonczy; Melissa L Johnson; Makoto Nishio; Martin Reck; Tony Mok; Sivuonthanh Lam; David S Shames; Juan Liu; Beiying Ding; Ariel Lopez-Chavez; Fairooz Kabbinavar; Wei Lin; Alan Sandler; Stephen V Liu
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Treating metastatic disease: Which survival model is best suited for the clinic?

Authors:  Jonathan Agner Forsberg; Daniel Sjoberg; Qing-Rong Chen; Andrew Vickers; John H Healey
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement.

Authors:  Gary S Collins; Johannes B Reitsma; Douglas G Altman; Karel G M Moons
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Estimating survival in patients with operable skeletal metastases: an application of a bayesian belief network.

Authors:  Jonathan Agner Forsberg; John Eberhardt; Patrick J Boland; Rikard Wedin; John H Healey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  How do we estimate survival? External validation of a tool for survival estimation in patients with metastatic bone disease-decision analysis and comparison of three international patient populations.

Authors:  Andrea Piccioli; M Silvia Spinelli; Jonathan A Forsberg; Rikard Wedin; John H Healey; Vincenzo Ippolito; Primo Andrea Daolio; Pietro Ruggieri; Giulio Maccauro; Alessandro Gasbarrini; Roberto Biagini; Raimondo Piana; Flavio Fazioli; Alessandro Luzzati; Alberto Di Martino; Francesco Nicolosi; Francesco Camnasio; Michele Attilio Rosa; Domenico Andrea Campanacci; Vincenzo Denaro; Rodolfo Capanna
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 10.  Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for solid tumors.

Authors:  Kheng Newick; Edmund Moon; Steven M Albelda
Journal:  Mol Ther Oncolytics       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 7.200

View more
  17 in total

1.  What Factors Are Associated With Local Metastatic Lesion Progression After Intramedullary Nail Stabilization?

Authors:  Punthitra Arpornsuksant; Carol D Morris; Jonathan A Forsberg; Adam S Levin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Fifty years of bone tumors.

Authors:  Meredith K Bartelstein; Patrick J Boland
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-10       Impact factor: 2.885

3.  Quantitative preoperative patient assessments are related to survival and procedure outcome for osseous metastases.

Authors:  Meredith K Bartelstein; Jonathan A Forsberg; Jessica A Lavery; Mohamed A Yakoub; Samuel Akhnoukh; Patrick J Boland; Nicola Fabbri; John H Healey
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 4.491

4.  Prosthesis or osteosynthesis for the treatment of a pathological hip fracture? A nationwide registry-based cohort study.

Authors:  Panagiotis Tsagkozis; Jessica Ehne; Rikard Wedin; Margareta Hedström
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 4.072

5.  CORR Insights®: Radiation Disrupts Protective Function of the Spinal Meninges in a Mouse Model of Tumor-induced Spinal Cord Compression.

Authors:  Timothy A Damron
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 4.755

6.  Editorial: Opposites Attract at CORR®-Machine Learning and Qualitative Research.

Authors:  Seth S Leopold; Raphaël Porcher; Mark C Gebhardt; Terence J Gioe; Paul A Manner; Clare M Rimnac; Montri D Wongworawat
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 4.755

7.  Prognosis by cancer type and incidence of zoledronic acid-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: a single-center retrospective study.

Authors:  Hironobu Hata; Kenji Imamachi; Michihiro Ueda; Masashi Matsuzaka; Hiroaki Hiraga; Toshihisa Osanai; Toru Harabayashi; Katsuya Fujimoto; Satoshi Oizumi; Masato Takahashi; Kazuhito Yoshikawa; Jun Sato; Yutaka Yamazaki; Yoshimasa Kitagawa
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 3.359

8.  Can Machine-learning Algorithms Predict Early Revision TKA in the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Registry?

Authors:  Anders El-Galaly; Clare Grazal; Andreas Kappel; Poul Torben Nielsen; Steen Lund Jensen; Jonathan A Forsberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 4.755

9.  Surgical Treatment of Metastatic Bone Disease-When Decisions at End-of-Life Really Makes the Difference.

Authors:  Michala Skovlund Sørensen; Michael Mørk Petersen
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  CORR Insights®: Can a Novel Scoring System Improve on the Mirels Score in Predicting the Fracture Risk in Patients with Multiple Myeloma?

Authors:  Timothy A Damron
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.755

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.