Literature DB >> 32195649

A pooled analysis of patients with wound infections in the Phase 3 REVIVE trials: randomized, double-blind studies to evaluate the safety and efficacy of iclaprim versus vancomycin for treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections.

Stephanie Noviello1, G Ralph Corey2, Thomas L Holland2, Thomas Lodise3, William O'Riordan4, Mark H Wilcox5, Thomas M File6, Matthew Dryden7, Barbara Balser8, Amy Scaramucci8, Antoni Torres9, David B Huang1,10.   

Abstract

Introduction. Iclaprim is a diaminopyrimidine antibiotic for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) due to Gram-positive pathogens.Aim. This analysis evaluates patients with wound infections from two Phase 3 trials of ABSSSI.Methodology. Six-hundred-two patients with wound infections from two Phase 3, double-blinded, randomized, multicenter, active controlled trials (REVIVE-1/-2) were evaluated in a post hoc analysis of iclaprim 80 mg compared with vancomycin 15 mg kg-1 administered intravenously every 12 h for 5-14 days. The primary endpoint was to determine whether iclaprim was non-inferior (10 % margin) to vancomycin in achieving a ≥20 % reduction from baseline in lesion size 48-72 h after starting study drug (early clinical response [ECR]). Safety was assessed.Results. In REVIVE-1, ECR was 83.5 % with iclaprim versus 79.7 % with vancomycin (treatment difference 3.77%, 95 % CI -4.50%, 12.04%). In REVIVE-2, ECR was 82.7 % with iclaprim versus 76.3 % with vancomycin (treatment difference 6.38%, 95 % CI -3.35%, 16.12%). In the pooled dataset, iclaprim had similar ECR rates compared with vancomycin among wound infection patients (83.2 % vs 78.2 %) with a treatment difference of 5.01 % (95 % CI -1.29%, 11.32%). The safety profile was similar in iclaprim- and vancomycin-treated patients, except for a higher incidence of diarrhea with vancomycin (n=17) compared with iclaprim (n=6) and fatigue with iclaprim (n=17) compared with vancomycin (n=8).Conclusion. Based on early clinical response, iclaprim achieved non-inferiority to vancomycin with a similar safety profile in patients with wound infections suspected or confirmed as caused by Gram-positive pathogens. Iclaprim may be a valuable treatment option for wound infections.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gram-positive; iclaprim; wound infection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32195649     DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.001177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Microbiol        ISSN: 0022-2615            Impact factor:   2.472


  2 in total

1.  Efficacy and Safety of Iclaprim for the Treatment of Skin Structures and Soft Tissue Infections: A Methodological Framework.

Authors:  Lian Wang; Jin Fan; Linli Zheng; Lingmin Chen
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 5.988

Review 2.  Antibiotics in the pipeline: a literature review (2017-2020).

Authors:  Jaffar A Al-Tawfiq; Hisham Momattin; Anfal Y Al-Ali; Khalid Eljaaly; Raghavendra Tirupathi; Mohamed Bilal Haradwala; Swetha Areti; Saad Alhumaid; Ali A Rabaan; Abbas Al Mutair; Patricia Schlagenhauf
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 3.553

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.