| Literature DB >> 32195389 |
Cynthia Borkai Boye1, Etornam Bani Fiadonu1.
Abstract
Rock coasts are perceived to be stable, however, recent occurrence of stacks of rocks and subsequent loss of some rocky coasts poses a challenge for research. This study sought to assess the impact of waves on the compressive/tensile strength of the rocks and further investigated the lithological properties of coastal material that influence shoreline change along the heterogeneous rock coast of the western region of Ghana. The study determined how the petrology and mineralogy of the various rocks types influence the stability of rocky shoreline. Data used included available historic topographic maps and images, Geological map, directional wave data, field measurements of rock hardness and rock samples collected for laboratory investigations. Schmidt's hammer was used to measure in-situ rock hardness. Shoreline features for the study period (1974-2005) were extracted from multi-temporal dataset into a geodatabase, and change statistics computed by end point rate method using DSAS, an extension of Arc GIS software. Thin sections were produced from rock samples collected from the field, and petrographic and microscopic analyses were carried out on them. It was found that wave impact was minimal compared with the tensile strength of the rocks in the study area; thus wave is not the key geomorphic agent in the study area. The results showed shoreline accretion at few sites, whereas other parts of the rocky shoreline are eroding at varying degrees. It was observed that the site lithology of the rock coast as well as the quartz feldspar ratio content of the rocks influence the shoreline change rates, as quartz bearing rocks are often more resistant to weathering. It was also noted that the strength of the intact rock had moderate correlation with the shoreline change rates; instead the mineralogy, state of weathering and textural properties of the rocks explains the shoreline change rates along the coast.Entities:
Keywords: Accretion; Earth sciences; Environmental science; Microscopy; Mineralogy; Petrography; Quartz-feldspar ratio; Recession; Sandstones; Shoreline change; Stacks of rocks
Year: 2020 PMID: 32195389 PMCID: PMC7078283 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03539
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Figure 1Geological map of the study area (source: Geological survey of Ghana).
Figure 2Selected hand samples collected/photomicrographs obtained from selected sites of the study area.
Figure 3Photographs of some parts of the rock coast of the study area.
Figure 4Shoreline change rates and coastal rock strength along the rocky sections of the study area.
Figure 5Shoreline change at rock coast sites.
Wave energy flux generated per section.
| Name of Section | Angle of breaking wave crest with shore (α) | Wave Energy Flux factor (Pls) (N/s) | Potential Sediment Transport (N/s) | Sediment Transport per hour (N/hr) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dixcove-Shama | 143.08 | -2698.980 | -1052.602 | -0.120 |
| Cape Three Points - Atwiwa | 102.08 | 2724.064 | 1062.385 | 0.121 |
| Axim-Princess Town | 71.08 | 2515.772 | 981.151 | 0.112 |
Mean compressive/tensile strength of coastal rocks per section.
| Name of Section | Selected Samples | Rebound Values | Median | Compressive Strength/Mpa | Tensile Strength/Mpa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shama-Dixcove | SC1 | 44.46 | 44.48 | 32.304 | 1.989 |
| AB1 | 45.85 | ||||
| ADC1 | 33.5 | ||||
| PUC1 | 44.5 | ||||
| MPC1 | 46.27 | ||||
| ASC1 | 44.08 | ||||
| Atwiwa -CapeThree Points | ATC1 | 50.94 | 50.94 | 36.121 | 2.104 |
| KTC1 | 58.56 | ||||
| C3PC1 | 47 | ||||
| Princess Town - Axim | 52.25 | 46.73 | 33.633 | 2.030 | |
| 44.08 | |||||
| 42.67 | |||||
| 49.38 |
Figure 6Photomicrographs of thin sections of some rock samples along the coast (a&b): granodiorite shows phenaritic lath of plagioclase with pyroxene inclusions (c): granite with subhedral grains of feldspars (orthoclase and plagioclase) interlock in anhedral quartz, d) fine to medium grain dioritic rock with plagioclase and quartz in fine groundmass of biotite, hornblende and quartz, e) porphyritic hornblende granodiorite at cape three, f) sandstone.
Field descriptions of categorised erosive areas.
| Shoreline change rate Category | Sample Point | Sample ID | Field Petrographic Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Relatively High Erosive Sites (r ≥ -1 m/yr) | Abuesi | Foliated gneiss with quartz veins | |
| Nkontompo | MPC1 | Highly weathered shales | |
| Prusi Akatakyie | Fine grained, dark metamorphic rock with network of quartzofeldspatic veinlets likely to be shear zone | ||
| Prince's Town | Highly jointed granitic rock with quartz vein | ||
| Miamea | |||
| Intermediate Erosive Sites (-0.5 ≤ r < -1 m/yr) | Shama | SC1 | Highly jointed, moderately weathered granitic rock |
| Aboadze | AB1 | Weathered massive sandstone | |
| Akyinim | ATC1 | Granitoids with coarse grained quartzo feldspathic dykes | |
| Adjan | Highly fractured granitic rock with quartz vein | ||
| Low Erosive Sites (r < -0.5 m/yr) | Ekuasi/Sekondi | Massive sandstone | |
| Ketakor | KTC1 | Belt-type granitoids with abundant mafic minerals | |
| Butre | Highly jointed greenish fine grained igneous rocks | ||
| Adjua | ADC1 | Adjua Shales inter bedded with sandstone | |
| Esikado | Gneiss with pegmatite intrusions | ||
| Essipon | Sandstone, sea stack and isolated pegmatic veins. | ||
| Pumpuni | PUC1 | Very fine grained shales with interbedded sandstone. | |
| Agyembra | |||
| Ankobra | Red brown fine grained foliated metamorphic rock | ||
| Ekuasi/Sekondi | Massive sandstone | ||
| Ketakor | KTC1 | Belt-type granitoids with more mafic minerals | |
| Cape Three Point | C3PC1 | Highly jointed porphyritic granitoids |
Figure 8Correlation between rock strength and quartz-feldspar ratio.
Figure 9Correlation between Q/F ratio and shoreline change.
Figure 7Histogram of quartz/feldspar ratio and shoreline recession rate.
Mineral compositions, Q/F ratio and the recession rate of the various rocks.
| Rock Type | Modal Mineral Composition | Grain Size (mm) | Rock Strength (N/m2) | Recession Rate (m/yr) | Q/F Ratio | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qtz | Feld | K-feld. | Acc | Qtz (mm) | Fel (mm) | |||||
| KTC1 | Granitoid | 20 | 40 | 25 | 15 | 0.2–3 | 0.7–5 | 58.56 | -0.14 | 0.3 |
| C3PC1 | Granodiorite | 5 | 45 | 35 | 15 | 0.1–0.3 | 0.2–0.4 | 47 | -1.05 | 0.1 |
| ATC1 | Granitoids | 25 | 40 | 30 | 5 | 0.3–5 | 0.5–6 | 50.94 | 0.557 | 0.4 |
| SC1 | Granite | 20 | 30 | 15 | 35 | 0.2–2 | 0.4–3 | 44.46 | -0.97 | 0.4 |
| MPC1 | Sandstone | 60 | 20 | 5 | 15 | 0.05–1 | 0.01–0.2 | 46.27 | -1.07 | 2.4 |
| ADC1 | Shale | 28 | 11 | 4 | 57 | 33.5 | -0.595 | 1.9 | ||
| PUC1 | Shale | 24 | 9 | - | 67 | 44.5 | -0.82 | 2.7 | ||
| AB1 | Sandstone | 70 | 15 | 5 | 10 | 0.04–0.3 | 0.02–0.1 | 45.85 | -1.30 | 3.5 |
| ASC1 | Sandstone | 75 | 10 | 10 | 5 | 44.08 | -0.526 | 3.8 | ||
Note: Qtz = Quatz, Feld = Plagioclase Feldspar, K-feld = k-feldspar, Acc = Accessory minerals, Ss = Sandstone.
Figure 10Correlation between rock hardness and shoreline change.