| Literature DB >> 32194958 |
Kai-Kai Liu1, Qian Liu1, Dong-Wen Yang1, Ya-Chuan Liang1, Lai-Zhi Sui2, Jian-Yong Wei1, Guo-Wei Xue1, Wen-Bo Zhao1, Xue-Ying Wu1, Lin Dong1, Chong-Xin Shan1.
Abstract
Poor stability has long been one of the key issues that hinder the practical applications of lead-based halide perovskites. In this paper, the photoluminescence (PL) quantum yield (QY) of bromide-based perovskites can be increased from 2.5% to 71.54% by introducing water, and the PL QY of a sample in aqueous solution decreases minimally over 1 year. The enhanced stability and PL QY can be attributed to the water-induced methylamino lead bromide perovskite (MAPbBr3)@PbBr(OH). We note that this strategy is universal to MAPbBr3, formamidine lead bromide perovskite (FAPbBr3), inorganic lead bromide perovskite (CsPbBr3), etc. Light-emitting devices (LEDs) are fabricated by using the as-prepared perovskite as phosphors on a 365 nm UV chip. The luminance intensity of the LED is 9549 cd/m2 when the driven current is 200 mA, and blemishes on the surface of glass are clearly observed under the illumination of the LEDs. This work provides a new strategy for highly stable and efficient perovskites.Entities:
Keywords: Nanoparticles; Optical materials and structures
Year: 2020 PMID: 32194958 PMCID: PMC7078192 DOI: 10.1038/s41377-020-0283-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Light Sci Appl ISSN: 2047-7538 Impact factor: 17.782
Fig. 1Schematic diagram of the synthesis process for water-induced MAPbBr3@PbBr(OH)
Fig. 2a PL spectra of MA-d (PL QY: 2.50%) and MA-h (PL QY: 71.54%), and the inset shows the corresponding optical images of the two samples under indoor lighting and UV illumination. b XRD patterns of MA-d and MA-h. c Magnification of regions marked in b. d SEM image of MA-d. e Elemental mapping of MA-d. f SEM image of MA-h, and the inset shows a laser confocal fluorescence microscopy image. g Elemental mapping of MA-h. h TEM image of the crushed MA-h. i HRTEM image of the QDs in MA-h
Fig. 3a The PL intensity of the sample during cycling. b The corresponding PL spectra of MA-h, and the inset is the magnified spectra. c, d The PL spectra and images of the MA-h powders immersed in different solvents. e The PL intensity of the sample in the presence of water at different temperatures, and the inset is the schematic diagram of the reaction. f The PL intensity of the sample in the presence of water under UV irradiation for different hours, and the inset shows the schematic diagram of the test
Fig. 4PL, PLE, and absorption spectra of a MA-d and b MA-h. c Temperature-dependent PL spectra. d PL decay curves of MA-d and MA-h, and the inset is the magnified spectra. e Time-resolved PL spectra of MA-h. f PL spectra of MA-h at different time delays. g Schematic illustration of the morphology evolution of the as-prepared MAPbBr3 perovskite. h Energy level diagram of PbBr(OH) and inner QDs
Fig. 5PL spectra of a FA lead bromide perovskite and b all-inorganic halide perovskites, and the insets show digital images of the corresponding samples in ambient light and under UV light. c Digital images of the large-scale synthesized sample (upper images) and LED based on the sample under different driven currents (bottom images). d EL spectra of the LEDs under different driven currents from 10 mA to 200 mA. e Schematic diagram of potential fingerprint detection based on the as-prepared LED. f Photographs of fingerprint (upper images) and the corresponding pseudocolor map and gray values along the profile (bottom images)
Summary of PL properties and stability of perovskite QDs
| Strategy | Perovskite | Emission peak (nm) | FWHM (nm) | PL QYs (%) | Stability | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compositional engineering | CsPbBr3 QDs | 513 | 20 | 95 | 90% (30 d, air) | [ |
| FAPbBr3 NCs | 530 | 22 | 85 | 38% (100 °C) | [ | |
| CsPbBr3: Mn QDs | 514–517 | 20 | 90 | 60% (120 d, air) | [ | |
| Surface engineering | MAPbBr3–APTES NCs | 505 | 42 | 55 | 70% (2.5 h, isopropanol) | [ |
| CsPbBr3–TDPA QDs | 522 | 22 | 68 | 80% (300 min, water) | [ | |
| CsPbBr3–CTAB QDs | 515 | 39 | 71 | 63% (80 min, UV) | [ | |
| Matrix encapsulation | CsPbBr3–Meso-SiO2 QDs | 515 | 20 | 55 | 60% (100 °C) | [ |
| CsPbBr3–Ami-SiO2 powders | 520 | 26 | 56 | 80% (108 h, UV) | [ | |
| CsPbBr3–PMMA powders | 510 | 25 | 45 | 75% (3 d, air) | [ | |
| MAPbBr3 powders | 518 | 50 | 11.7 | 82% (6 months, water) | [ | |
| CsPbBr3 powders | 508 | 45 | 53.9 | 74% (6 months, water) | [ | |
| MAPbBr3 powders | 514 | 28 | 71.5 | 90% (1 year, water, DMF), 80% (100 °C, water), 50% (60 h, UV) | Our work |