| Literature DB >> 32194848 |
Hua You1, Szymon Baluszek2, Bozena Kaminska1,2.
Abstract
Metastases to the central nervous system (CNS) occur frequently in adults and their frequency increases with the prolonged survival of cancer patients. Patients with CNS metastases have short survival, and modern therapeutics, while effective for extra-cranial cancers, do not reduce metastatic burden. Tumor cells attract and reprogram stromal cells, including tumor-associated macrophages that support cancer growth by promoting tissue remodeling, invasion, immunosuppression and metastasis. Specific roles of brain resident and infiltrating macrophages in creating a pre-metastatic niche for CNS invading cancer cells are less known. There are populations of CNS resident innate immune cells such as: parenchymal microglia and non-parenchymal, CNS border-associated macrophages that colonize CNS in early development and sustain its homeostasis. In this study we summarize available data on potential roles of different brain macrophages in most common brain metastases. We hypothesize that metastatic cancer cells exploit CNS macrophages and their cytoprotective mechanisms to create a pre-metastatic niche and facilitate metastatic growth. We assess current pharmacological strategies to manipulate functions of brain macrophages and hypothesize on their potential use in a therapy of CNS metastases. We conclude that the current data strongly support a notion that microglia, as well as non-parenchymal macrophages and peripheral infiltrating macrophages, are involved in multiple stages of CNS metastases. Understanding their contribution will lead to development of new therapeutic strategies. © The author(s).Entities:
Keywords: CNS border associated macrophages; brain metastases; cancer invasion; immune infiltrates; immunosuppression; intracellular signaling; microglia; perivascular macrophages; tumor microenvironment
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32194848 PMCID: PMC7053204 DOI: 10.7150/thno.40783
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Theranostics ISSN: 1838-7640 Impact factor: 11.556
Figure 1Colonization of CNS by cancer cells from a periphery. (A) Metastatic cancer cells from a periphery colonize CNS via penetration to the blood stream, hematogenous spread, extravasation from blood vessels, seeding a niche followed by tissue remodeling and growth of a secondary cancer. Those processes result in disturbance of CNS homeostasis. (B) Perivascular macrophages and circulating macrophages aid in extravasation of cancer cells (1). Subsequently, metastatic cancer cells secrete cytokines (2) activating CNS resident microglia and infiltrating peripheral macrophages to protect, repair, and instigate tissue repair. These events are associated with local immunosuppression, recruitment of microglia macrophages and tumor growth (3).
Monocytic populations in the central nervous system and CNS metastases
| Population | Markers | Brief description of functions | Role in metastases |
|---|---|---|---|
| Microglia | CD11b, CD68, CD115, CD206, CX3CR1, F4/80, Fcrls++, Iba1+, MerTK, P2ry12++, Siglec-H | In steady state: maintain homeostasis, exhibit a phagocytic activity, have low activity as antigen presenting cells | |
| CD11b, CD45, CD64, CD68, CD115, CD163+/-, CD206, CX3CR1, F4/80, Fcrls+, Iba1++, P2ry12+ | Upon activation: depending on stimuli polarization to an inflammatory of pro-tumorigenic phenotype: morphological changes, phagocytosis and antigen presentation, re-organization of ECM, cytokine and chemokine production | Tumor supporting phenotype degradation of ECM, modulating adaptive immune response, aiding in angiogenesis | |
| CNS border-associated macrophages (BAMs) | CD11b, CD45, CD68, CD115, CD163, CD206, CX3CR1, F4/80 | In steady state: maintain integrity of BBB. | Tumor supporting phenotype: facilitation of recruitment of cancer cells and immune cells via BBB |
| Infiltrating bone marrow-derived macrophages | CD11b, CD45, CD49D, CD64, CD68, CD115, CD163+/-, CD206, CCR2, F4/80, Ly6C | Infiltrate brain parenchyma mainly after breakdown of BBB; immunoregulatory and immunosuppressive functions; cytoprotective activity. | Tumor supporting phenotype: ECM remodeling, immune suppression, enhancement of angiogenesis. |
Figure 2A scheme illustrating intracellular signaling pathways that could be targeted with existing anticancer drugs in microglia in CNS metastases. Activation of integrins stimulates a focal adhesion kinase (FAK) which forms a complex with Src family kinases, which initiates multiple downstream signaling pathways through phosphorylation of other proteins. Among those pathways are phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI-3K), phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2), phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-bisphosphate (PIP3), small G proteins (Rho, Rac, Cdc42), AKT/protein kinase B, ERK (extracellularly regulated kinase) and JNK (Jun N terminal kinase), and mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin), all regulating different cellular functions. HDACs are histone deacetylases, epigenetic regulators that regulate histones, protein-DNA interaction, chromatin conformation, and transcription.
Molecular targets and therapeutics targeting microglia and macrophages
| Molecular target | Affected processes | Pharmaceutical | Trials in glioma | Trials in brain metastases |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSF1R | Recruitment and enhancement of cancer invasion | Pexidartinib | Phase II trial: lacking activity in comparison with historical controls | Limited; the phase I trial showed good activity in breast cancer |
| αvβ3 and αvβ5 integrins | Microglia-assisted angiogenesis; polarization of microglia | Cilengitide | Phase III trial: lacking activity in comparison with temolozomide | Minimal to none clinical activity in metastatic melanoma and pancreatic cancer |
| Immune check point inhibitors | PD-1 or PDL1 | Nivolumab | Phase III trial: lacking activity in comparison with bevacizumab | Nivolumab + ipilimumab combination is active in melanoma brain metastases |
| AXL kinase | AXL kinase regulates PD-1 expression | BGB324 alone or with Nivolumab | Inhibits glioma xenographs in pre-clinical trials | Not tested |
| mTOR | Polarization towards tumor-permissive phenotypes | Everolimus | Phase II trial: lacking activity in comparison with historical controls | Everolimus, lapatynib, and capecytabine combination had some activity in breast cancer brain metastases |
| Temsirolimus | Phase II trial: not superior to temolozomide but phosphorylation of mTORSer2448 can influence response | Safe and effective in renal cell carcinoma brain metastases | ||
| VEGF | TAMs chemotaxis and proliferation | Bevacizumab | Improves PFS but not OS in newly diagnosed glioblastoma | Encouraging results of various combinations in phase II trials with patients with brain metastases from NSCLC, breast cancer and colorectal cancer |
| Regorafenib | Improves PFS and OS in previously treated glioblastoma | In phase III trials, regorafenib significantly increased OS, and PFS of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer | ||
| Histone deacetylase | Effects dependent on dose or cell types | Vorinostat | Improved OS when compared with historical results, a subgroup of patients with clear benefit | Promising results in preclinical models of triple-negative breast cancer |
| Valproate | Increased survival in observational studies | |||
| Romidepsin | Augmented temozolomide sensitivity in human glioma cells |
PFS, progression free survival; OS, overall survival