| Literature DB >> 32194707 |
Yi-Xia Wang1,2, Yan Huang2, Xiao-Ping Xu1, Bo-Bin Chen1, Zhi-Guang Lin1, Yan Ma1, Tian-Ling Ding1, Qian Wang1.
Abstract
The present study aimed to investigate the curative effect of high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) combined with teniposide (Vm26) vs. HD-MTX alone in the treatment of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), in order to provide data for assisting decisions associated with clinical treatment. Data from 56 patients with PCNSL admitted in Shanghai Huashan Hospital (Shanghai, China) from January 2009 to December 2014 were included into the present study. Clinical data, curative effects and prognosis of patients in these two groups were retrospectively analyzed using SPSS 20 statistical software. In the HD-MTX+Vm26 group, 12 patients (42.85%) achieved complete remission (CR) and 10 patients (35.71%) achieved partial remission (PR), while in the HD-MTX group 7 patients (25%) achieved CR and 11 patients (39.29%) achieved PR (P=0.158). The median progression-free survival (PFS) time was 22 months in the HD-MTX+Vm26 group and 12 months in the HD-MTX group (P=0.019). The median overall survival time was 57 months in the HD-MTX+Vm26 group, and 28 months in the HD-MTX group (P=0.013). Compared with HD-MTX alone, the combined treatment of HD-MTX+Vm26 had an improved curative effect in the treatment of PCNSL, effectively controlled tumor progression in patients, prolonged survival time and improved prognosis. Age was an independent prognostic factor in patients with PCNSL. Patients with an age of ≤60 years exhibited longer PFS compared with patients with an age of >60 years. Copyright: © Wang et al.Entities:
Keywords: curative effect; methotrexate; primary central nervous system lymphoma; prognosis; teniposide
Year: 2020 PMID: 32194707 PMCID: PMC7039052 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2020.11328
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncol Lett ISSN: 1792-1074 Impact factor: 2.967
Criteria for assessment of therapeutic effects.
| Treatment response | Imaging examination | Dosage of glucocorticoid | Ophthalmologic examination | Cerebrospinal fluid examination |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CR | No enhancement | Nil | Normal | Negative |
| CRu | No enhancement | Any | Normal | Negative |
| No abnormal lesions | Any | Micro RPE was abnormal | Negative | |
| PR | Enhanced lesion was reduced by 50% | No association | Micro RPE was abnormal or normal | Negative |
| PD | No enhancement | No association | Vitreous cell or retinal infiltration, reduction | Persistent positive or suspicious positive |
| Tumor was reduced by 25% or new lesion appeared | No association | Recurrence or new eye lesions | Recurrence or positive |
CR, complete remission; Cru, unconfirmed complete remission; RPE, retinal pigment epithelial cells; PR, partial remission; PD, disease progression: SD, stable disease, in a state between PR and PD. In the present study, CR included CR and CRu.
Comparison of the curative effects between treatments groups.
| Group | MTX + Vm26 | MTX | χ2 | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CR | 12 (42.85%) | 7 (25%) | 1.991 | 0.158 |
| PR | 10 (35.71%) | 11 (39.29%) | 0.076 | 0.783 |
| SD | 4 (14.29%) | 4 (14.29%) | 0.000 | 1.000 |
| PD | 2 (7.14%) | 6 (21.43%) | 1.313 | 0.252 |
| OR | 22 (78.57%) | 18 (64.3%) | 1.400 | 0.237 |
| Median PFS, months | 22 | 12 | 5.462 | 0.019 |
| Median OS, months | 57 | 28 | 6.196 | 0.013 |
CR, complete response; PR, partial remission; SD, stable disease; PD, progressive disease; OR, overall response; PFS, progression-free survival; OS, overall survival; MTX, methotrexate; Vm26, Teniposide.
Figure 1.Median OS and PFS. (A) Median OS in 55 patients. (B) Median OS between the two groups. (C) The association between PFS and age. (D) The association between PFS and courses of treatment. OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival. MTX, methotrexate; Vm26, Teniposide.
Univariate analysis.
| Potential prognostic factors | PD/total cases | Median PFS, months | χ2 | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 20 | 6.021 | 0.014 | |
| ≤60 | 19/43 | 22 | ||
| >60 | 11/13 | 12 | ||
| ECOG score, points | 0.017 | 0.896 | ||
| 0–1 | 6/12 | 22 | ||
| ≥1 | 24/44 | 20 | ||
| Deep lesions accumulating | 1.117 | 0.291 | ||
| No | 14/22 | 16 | ||
| Yes | 16/34 | 20 | ||
| Number of lesions | 0.741 | 0.389 | ||
| Single | 14/22 | 16 | ||
| Multiple | 16/34 | 20 | ||
| Serum LDH | 1.100 | 0.294 | ||
| Normal (106–211 U/l) | 15/35 | 24 | ||
| Abnormally increasing | 15/21 | 18 | ||
| Blood β2-MG | 0.793 | 0.373 | ||
| Normal (0.70–1.80 mg/l) | 14/24 | 17 | ||
| Abnormally increasing | 16/32 | 22 | ||
| Urine β2-MG | 0.076 | 0.783 | ||
| Normal (<0.25 mg/l) | 19/35 | 18 | ||
| Abnormally increasing | 11/21 | 21 | ||
| CSF; Pandy's test | 1.670 | 0.196 | ||
| Negative | 4/6 | 10 | ||
| Positive | 13/20 | 20 | ||
| CSF protein quantification | 0.948 | 0.330 | ||
| Normal (150–450 mg/l) | 5/8 | 10 | ||
| Abnormally increasing | 12/18 | 20 | ||
| CSF glucose level | 0.160 | 0.689 | ||
| Normal (2.5–4.4 mmol/l) | 12/20 | 20 | ||
| Abnormal | 5/6 | 20 | ||
| CSF chloride | 0.915 | 0.339 | ||
| Normal (2.7–3.9 mmol/l) | 12/14 | 20 | ||
| Abnormal | 5/12 | 22 | ||
| CSF white blood cell count | 2.296 | 0.130 | ||
| Normal (0–5/mm3) | 12/19 | 24 | ||
| Abnormally increasing | 5/7 | 20 | ||
| Lesion resection by surgery | 0.562 | 0.454 | ||
| Yes | 12/31 | 20 | ||
| No | 18/25 | 22 | ||
| Received CR | 3.519 | 0.061 | ||
| No | 22/37 | 20 | ||
| Yes | 8/19 | 69 | ||
| Chemotherapy regiments | 4.557 | 0.033 | ||
| HD-MTX | 16/28 | 12 | ||
| HD-MTX + Vm26 | 14/28 | 22 | 0.920 | 0.631 |
| Therapeutic schedule | ||||
| Chemotherapy | 16/29 | 18 | ||
| Chemotherapy + radiotherapy | 4/7 | 21 | ||
| Radiotherapy + chemotherapy | 10/20 | 22 |
ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; PFS, progression-free survival; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; β2-MG, β2-microglobulin; PD, progressive disease; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; HD-MTX, high-dose methotrexate; Vm26, Teniposide
Multivariate analysis.
| Factor | B | SE | Wald test | D.f. | P-value | Exp (B) | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | −0.886 | 0.400 | 4.902 | 1 | 0.027 | 0.412 | 0.188–0.903 |
| Treatment remission | 0.595 | 0.428 | 1.928 | 1 | 0.165 | 1.812 | 0.783–4.195 |
| Treatment regimen | 0.951 | 0.412 | 5.321 | 1 | 0.021 | 2.587 | 1.154–5.803 |
B, regression coefficient estimate value; SE, standard error; D.f, degrees of freedom; Exp (B), odds ratio of the outcome; CI, confidence interval.
Comparison of toxic reactions between MTX + Vm26 and MTX treatment groups.
| Toxicity | MTX+Vm26 (%) | MTX (%) | χ2 | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hematologic | ||||
| Grade 3–4 leukopenia | 8 (28.57) | 6 (21.43) | 0.381 | 0.537 |
| Grade 3–4 anemia | 3 (10.71) | 2 (7.14) | 0.220 | 0.639 |
| Grade 3–4 PLT decrease | 4 (14.29) | 2 (7.14) | 0.747 | 0.388 |
| Non-hematologic | ||||
| Grade 2 abnormal liver function | 5 (17.86) | 4 (14.29) | 0.132 | 0.716 |
| Grade 2 renal function damage | 4 (14.29) | 5 (17.86) | 0.132 | 0.716 |
| Grade 2 numbness | 3 (10.71) | 2 (7.14) | 0.220 | 0.639 |
PLT, platelet; MTX, methotrexate; Vm26, Teniposide.