| Literature DB >> 32194521 |
Arthur M Talman1,2, Dinkorma T D Ouologuem3, Katie Love1, Virginia M Howick1, Charles Mulamba1, Aboubecrin Haidara3, Niawanlou Dara3, Daman Sylla3, Adama Sacko3, Mamadou M Coulibaly3, Francois Dao3, Cheick P O Sangare3, Abdoulaye Djimde3, Mara K N Lawniczak1.
Abstract
Plasmodium falciparum remains one of the leading causes of child mortality, and nearly half of the world's population is at risk of contracting malaria. While pathogenesis results from replication of asexual forms in human red blood cells, it is the sexually differentiated forms, gametocytes, which are responsible for the spread of the disease. For transmission to succeed, both mature male and female gametocytes must be taken up by a female Anopheles mosquito during its blood meal for subsequent differentiation into gametes and mating inside the mosquito gut. Observed circulating numbers of gametocytes in the human host are often surprisingly low. A pre-fertilization behavior, such as skin sequestration, has been hypothesized to explain the efficiency of human-to-mosquito transmission but has not been sufficiently tested due to a lack of appropriate tools. In this study, we describe the optimization of a qPCR tool that enables the relative quantification of gametocytes within very small input samples. Such a tool allows for the quantification of gametocytes in different compartments of the host and the vector that could potentially unravel mechanisms that enable highly efficient malaria transmission. We demonstrate the use of our gametocyte quantification method in mosquito blood meals from both direct skin feeding on Plasmodium gametocyte carriers and standard membrane feeding assay. Relative gametocyte abundance was not different between mosquitoes fed through a membrane or directly on the skin suggesting that there is no systematic enrichment of gametocytes picked up in the skin.Entities:
Keywords: Plasmodium falciparum; gametocyte; malaria; mosquito feeding; transmission
Year: 2020 PMID: 32194521 PMCID: PMC7062676 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00246
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Feed data for six patients. Parasitemia and gametocytemia were established by microscopy.
| EGF006 | 14,680 | 520 | 16/17 | 15/17 | 16/17 | 12/13 | Greater | 0.03091 | NS | 0.1986 |
| EGF007 | 37,640 | 48 | 17/18 | 6/8 | 19/20 | 14/15 | Greater | 0.006914 | NS | 0.05617 |
| EGF009 | 4800 | 144 | 15/15 | 11/12 | 17/19 | 10/10 | NS | 0.1377 | NS | 0.617 |
| EGF014 | 1440 | 360 | 16/17 | 9/9 | 15/15 | 19/20 | Greater | 0.01363 | NS | 0.2308 |
| EFG017 | 512 | 296 | 21/21 | 20/21 | 23/23 | 23/23 | Less | 0.01764 | NS | 0.3374 |
| EFG020 | 17,520 | 96 | 14/21 | 12/17 | 9/21 | 11/24 | Less | 2.545E-06 | less | 3.06E-05 |
| NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | Less | 8.138e-06 | NS | 0.05251 | |
FIGURE 1The GQA, a multiplex assay capable of sensitively detecting gametocyte uptake by mosquitoes. (A) RNAseq (López-Barragán et al., 2011) and qPCR fold change of 107 transcripts in gametocytes compared to ring stage parasites. The color scale indicates sex-bias in expression based on (Lasonder et al., 2016) with high female:male ratios in red and balanced ratios in blue. (B) Relative abundance of MDV-1 in blood meals of mosquitoes fed on a serial dilution of gametocytes compared to the maximum gametocyte input (100,000/bloodmeal). Error bars represent the standard deviation. (C) Relationship between observed gametocyte numbers by microscopy and delta Ct of test and control gene in 10 μl blood samples from symptomatic malaria patients colored by asexual parasitemia (26 samples from 6 patients).
FIGURE 2Comparison of gametocyte density in natural and artificial mosquito blood meals. Gametocyte detected in mosquitoes fed on six patients either by direct skin feeding or membrane feeding. The left panel shows the data pooled across patients and the right displays results for each individual. Hinges correspond to the first and third quartiles, whiskers extend 1.5 interquartile range on either side of the hinges. Jitter points are overlaid, those beyond the whiskers are outlying points.
ANOVA full results.
| Feed | 0.7305 | 0.39331 | |
| Patient | 6.6312 | 6.461e-06 | |
| Feed × patient | 2.7878 | 0.01744 | |
| Feed | 1.7948 | 0.18121 | |
| Patient | 5.5182 | 6.612e-05 | |
| Feed × patient | 2.6143 | 0.02445 | |
| Feed | 0.1488 | 0.6999 | |
| Patient | 1.7555 | 0.1214 | |
| Feed × patient | 1.4370 | 0.2102 |