Victoria C Chang1, Ping Pan1, Shinil K Shah2, Aditya Srinivasan3, Elizabeth Haberl3, Charlie Wan3, Tanyaradzwa M Kajese4, John A Primomo1, Garth Davis1. 1. Division of Minimally Invasive and Elective General Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas; UT Physicians, The Davis Clinic at Memorial Hermann-Memorial City Medical Center, Houston, Texas. 2. Division of Minimally Invasive and Elective General Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas; Michael E. DeBakey Institute for Comparative Cardiovascular Science and Biomedical Devices, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas. 3. Division of Minimally Invasive and Elective General Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas. 4. Division of Minimally Invasive and Elective General Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas; UT Physicians, The Davis Clinic at Memorial Hermann-Memorial City Medical Center, Houston, Texas. Electronic address: Tanyaradzwa.M.Kajese@uth.tmc.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The role of routine preoperative endoscopy before primary weight loss surgery remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: We reviewed our experience to determine the frequency of abnormal findings in patients undergoing routine preoperative endoscopy before bariatric surgery. SETTING: A tertiary level, academic-affiliated bariatric surgery practice. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed between July 2014 and June 2016 of patients undergoing routine preoperative endoscopy before primary bariatric surgery. Variables evaluated included preendoscopy symptoms, planned bariatric surgical procedure, abnormal findings on endoscopy, and changes in planned bariatric surgical procedure after endoscopy. RESULTS: A total of 631 patients met inclusion criteria. Of patients, 72% (457) were female. The median age was 44 (interquartile range 36-55). The median body mass index was 46 (interquartile range 42-51). Most patients had no preendoscopy clinical symptoms (61.3%). The most frequent abnormal findings included esophagitis (26.5%), hiatal hernia (27.1%), gastric ulcer (4.9%), and biopsy-proven Barrett's esophagus (4.6%). Although patients with preoperative symptoms were more likely to have abnormal findings on endoscopy, there were no significant differences in rates of Barrett's esophagus in patients with (5.3%) or without (4.1%) symptoms. Of the total cohort, 18.4% had a change in their planned operation after endoscopy results. CONCLUSION: The findings in our large series suggest selective screening in symptomatic patients only may lead to failure of discovery of foregut pathology that should prompt consideration for changes in the planned bariatric surgical procedure. Further study is necessary to see if our findings have broad applicability.
BACKGROUND: The role of routine preoperative endoscopy before primary weight loss surgery remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: We reviewed our experience to determine the frequency of abnormal findings in patients undergoing routine preoperative endoscopy before bariatric surgery. SETTING: A tertiary level, academic-affiliated bariatric surgery practice. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed between July 2014 and June 2016 of patients undergoing routine preoperative endoscopy before primary bariatric surgery. Variables evaluated included preendoscopy symptoms, planned bariatric surgical procedure, abnormal findings on endoscopy, and changes in planned bariatric surgical procedure after endoscopy. RESULTS: A total of 631 patients met inclusion criteria. Of patients, 72% (457) were female. The median age was 44 (interquartile range 36-55). The median body mass index was 46 (interquartile range 42-51). Most patients had no preendoscopy clinical symptoms (61.3%). The most frequent abnormal findings included esophagitis (26.5%), hiatal hernia (27.1%), gastric ulcer (4.9%), and biopsy-proven Barrett's esophagus (4.6%). Although patients with preoperative symptoms were more likely to have abnormal findings on endoscopy, there were no significant differences in rates of Barrett's esophagus in patients with (5.3%) or without (4.1%) symptoms. Of the total cohort, 18.4% had a change in their planned operation after endoscopy results. CONCLUSION: The findings in our large series suggest selective screening in symptomatic patients only may lead to failure of discovery of foregut pathology that should prompt consideration for changes in the planned bariatric surgical procedure. Further study is necessary to see if our findings have broad applicability.