Giorgio Ciprandi1, Matteo Gelardi2. 1. Allergy Clinic, Casa di Cura Villa Montallegro, Genoa, Italy. gio.cip@libero.it. 2. Otorhinolaryngological Clinic, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy. gio.cip@libero.it.
To the Editor,we would like to thank Rafael Martínez-Girón, Hugo Cornelis van Woerden, and Cristina Martínez-Torre, who confirmed post-viral, namely during rhinovirus infection, cytomorphological alterations loaded to nasal epithelial cells (1). The outcomes of that study were consistent with our research that described structural modification during viral infection (2,3). In this regard, the first evidence concerned vacuolar degeneration at the cytoplasmic level and further nuclear impairment, manly nuclear alterations, such as intranuclear halo (4). In particular, it has to note that the “halo” is inside the cellular membrane as confirmed by electronic microscopy (3).Analyzing the subjects investigated by the authors, it seems that some relevant details were lacking, mainly concerning the type of perennial rhinitis. In fact, as reported, all subjects were treated with oral H1 antagonists and intranasal corticosteroids. Both medications are commonly prescribed for allergic rhinitis. Besides, 2 patients had nasal polyps and one asthma. There is a reasonable suspicion that they suffered from allergic rhinitis. In conflict with this hypothesis, eosinophils were, however, very scarce. Remarkably, perennial rhinitis was not classified in their study. Consistently, we would underline the clinical relevance of nasal cytology in the workup of nasal disorders (5). Nasal cytology is a simple, easy, and repeatable technique that is very fruitful in clinical practice. Nasal cytology carefully defines the phenotype and endotype of rhinitis, so it is a classic example of Precision Medicine (6) and it is a point-of-care test (7). Moreover, it has been recently standardized, thus the methodology has been rigorously validated (8). In the context of the topic, a close link exists between allergic rhinitis and rhinovirus. It was demonstrated that allergic patients have a mucosal inflammation that involves adhesion molecule machinery, mainly intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), and is associated with functional impairment, such as nasal airflow limitation (9-11). Interestingly, ICAM-1 is also the main receptor for rhinovirus: this curious coincidence explains the increased susceptibility to infections in allergic patients (12). These concepts underline the importance of a precise and documented diagnosis of rhinitis that is the requisite for a tailored treatment: the so-called Personalized Medicine (13).In conclusion, nasal cytology could be envisaged as a mandatory test to identify the phenotype, and endotype to optimize the management of patients with perennial rhinitis.
Authors: G W Canonica; G Ciprandi; G P Pesce; S Buscaglia; F Paolieri; M Bagnasco Journal: Int Arch Allergy Immunol Date: 1995 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.749
Authors: M J Mäkelä; T Puhakka; O Ruuskanen; M Leinonen; P Saikku; M Kimpimäki; S Blomqvist; T Hyypiä; P Arstila Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 1998-02 Impact factor: 5.948