Literature DB >> 32191516

Russian Twitter Accounts and the Partisan Polarization of Vaccine Discourse, 2015-2017.

Dror Walter1, Yotam Ophir1, Kathleen Hall Jamieson1.   

Abstract

Objectives. To understand how Twitter accounts operated by the Russian Internet Research Agency (IRA) discussed vaccines to increase the credibility of their manufactured personas.Methods. We analyzed 2.82 million tweets published by 2689 IRA accounts between 2015 and 2017. Combining unsupervised machine learning and network analysis to identify "thematic personas" (i.e., accounts that consistently share the same topics), we analyzed the ways in which each discussed vaccines.Results. We found differences in volume and valence of vaccine-related tweets among 9 thematic personas. Pro-Trump personas were more likely to express antivaccine sentiment. Anti-Trump personas expressed support for vaccination. Others offered a balanced valence, talked about vaccines neutrally, or did not tweet about vaccines.Conclusions. IRA-operated accounts discussed vaccines in manners consistent with fabricated US identities.Public Health Implications. IRA accounts discussed vaccines online in ways that evoked political identities. This could exacerbate recently emerging partisan gaps relating to vaccine misinformation, as differently valenced messages were targeted at different segments of the US public. These sophisticated targeting efforts, if repeated and increased in reach, could reduce vaccination rates and magnify health disparities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32191516      PMCID: PMC7144436          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305564

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  5 in total

1.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations.

Authors:  Mikail Rubinov; Olaf Sporns
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing.

Authors:  Stephan Lewandowsky; Ullrich K H Ecker; Colleen M Seifert; Norbert Schwarz; John Cook
Journal:  Psychol Sci Public Interest       Date:  2012-12

3.  Weaponized Health Communication: Twitter Bots and Russian Trolls Amplify the Vaccine Debate.

Authors:  David A Broniatowski; Amelia M Jamison; SiHua Qi; Lulwah AlKulaib; Tao Chen; Adrian Benton; Sandra C Quinn; Mark Dredze
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Sowing the seeds of skepticism: Russian state news and anti-GMO sentiment.

Authors:  Shawn F Dorius; Carolyn J Lawrence-Dill
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 3.074

5.  The influence of political ideology and trust on willingness to vaccinate.

Authors:  Bert Baumgaertner; Juliet E Carlisle; Florian Justwan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total
  12 in total

1.  Vaccine Hesitancy in North Carolina: The Elephant in the Room?

Authors:  Lavanya Vasudevan; Emmanuel Walter; Geeta Swamy
Journal:  N C Med J       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr

Review 2.  Emerging digital technologies in cancer treatment, prevention, and control.

Authors:  Bradford W Hesse; Dominika Kwasnicka; David K Ahern
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.626

3.  Exploring Web-Based Twitter Conversations Surrounding National Healthcare Decisions Day and Advance Care Planning From a Sociocultural Perspective: Computational Mixed Methods Analysis.

Authors:  Tahleen A Lattimer; Kelly E Tenzek; Yotam Ophir; Suzanne S Sullivan
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-04-13

4.  Differences in beliefs about COVID-19 by gun ownership: a cross-sectional survey of Texas adults.

Authors:  Renee M Johnson; Cassandra Crifasi; Erin M Anderson Goodell; Arkadiusz Wiśniowski; Joseph W Sakshaug; Johannes Thrul; Mark Owens
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Content and Dynamics of Websites Shared Over Vaccine-Related Tweets in COVID-19 Conversations: Computational Analysis.

Authors:  Iain Cruickshank; Tamar Ginossar; Jason Sulskis; Elena Zheleva; Tanya Berger-Wolf
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  Characterization of Vaccine Tweets During the Early Stage of the COVID-19 Outbreak in the United States: Topic Modeling Analysis.

Authors:  Li Crystal Jiang; Tsz Hang Chu; Mengru Sun
Journal:  JMIR Infodemiology       Date:  2021-09-14

7.  Development of Personas to Communicate Narrative-Based Information About the HPV Vaccine on Twitter.

Authors:  Philip M Massey; Shawn C Chiang; Meredith Rose; Regan M Murray; Madeline Rockett; Elikem Togo; Ann C Klassen; Jennifer A Manganello; Amy E Leader
Journal:  Front Digit Health       Date:  2021-08-04

8.  The Role of Twitter in the WHO's Fight against the Infodemic.

Authors:  Daniel Muñoz-Sastre; Luis Rodrigo-Martín; Isabel Rodrigo-Martín
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Knowledge, attitude, and practice toward COVID-19 vaccination in Kazakhstan: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Alpamys Issanov; Zylkiya Akhmetzhanova; Dieter Riethmacher; Mohamad Aljofan
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 4.526

10.  Prospective associations of regional social media messages with attitudes and actual vaccination: A big data and survey study of the influenza vaccine in the United States.

Authors:  Man-Pui Sally Chan; Kathleen Hall Jamieson; Dolores Albarracin
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 3.641

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.