Literature DB >> 32191108

Overt attentional capture by reward-related stimuli overcomes inhibitory suppression.

Daniel Pearson1, Poppy Watson2, Phillip Xin Cheng3, Mike E Le Pelley2.   

Abstract

Salient-but-irrelevant distractors can automatically capture attention and eye-gaze in visual search. However, recent findings have suggested that attention to salient-but-irrelevant stimuli can be suppressed when observers use a specific target template to guide their search (i.e., feature search). A separate line of research has indicated that attentional selection is influenced by factors other than the physical salience of a stimulus and the observer's goals. For instance, pairing a stimulus with reward has been shown to increase the extent to which it captures attention and gaze (as though it has become more physically salient), even when such capture has negative consequences for the observer. Here we used eye-tracking with a rewarded visual search task to investigate whether capture by reward can be suppressed in the same way as capture by physical salience. When participants were encouraged to use feature search, attention to a distractor paired with relatively small reward was suppressed. However, under the same conditions attention was captured by a distractor paired with large reward, even when such capture resulted in reward omission. These findings suggest that reward-related stimuli are given special priority within the visual attention system over and above physically salient stimuli, and have implications for our understanding of real-world biases to reward-related stimuli, such as those seen in addiction. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32191108     DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000728

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  10 in total

1.  Can salient stimuli really be suppressed?

Authors:  Seah Chang; Howard E Egeth
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  An adaptive view of attentional control.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2021-12

3.  Reduced attentional capture by reward following an acute dose of alcohol.

Authors:  Poppy Watson; Daniel Pearson; Mike E Le Pelley
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Selection History-Driven Signal Suppression.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Andy Jeesu Kim
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2020-02-17

5.  The influence of reward history on goal-directed visual search.

Authors:  David S Lee; Andy J Kim; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Learning to avoid looking: Competing influences of reward on overt attentional selection.

Authors:  Daniel Pearson; Mike E Le Pelley
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-10

7.  Reward learning and statistical learning independently influence attentional priority of salient distractors in visual search.

Authors:  Mike E Le Pelley; Rhonda Ung; Chisato Mine; Steven B Most; Poppy Watson; Daniel Pearson; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Testing reward-cue attentional salience: Attainment and dynamic changes.

Authors:  Matteo De Tommaso; Massimo Turatto
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2021-10-28

9.  On the Influence of Spatial and Value Attentional Cues Across Individuals.

Authors:  Kelly G Garner; Michelle Lovell-Kane; Luke Carroll; Paul E Dux
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2022-06-24

10.  Combined influence of valence and statistical learning on the control of attention: Evidence for independent sources of bias.

Authors:  Haena Kim; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2020-12-25
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.