Literature DB >> 32191072

A decision-congruent heuristic gives superior metacognitive sensitivity under realistic variance assumptions.

Kiyofumi Miyoshi1, Hakwan Lau1.   

Abstract

Psychophysical studies on confidence construction are often grounded in bidimensional signal detection theory (SDT) and its relatives. However, these studies often stand on oversimplified assumptions of (a) bidimensional variance-equality and (b) bidimensional statistical independence. The present study simulated 2-alternative forced-choice and confidence rating performances, incorporating more empirically plausible variance-covariance structures. One prominent observation is that superior metacognitive accuracy can be achieved when one applies a heuristic in which the response-incongruent dimension of information is ignored. This is because such an heuristic takes advantage of the specific unequal-variance structure, which paradoxically cannot be easily exploited if both dimensions are evaluated together. Furthermore, under a variety of internal statistical structures, this simple heuristic predicts dissociations of objective decision and subjective metacognition, which have been empirically observed. Also, it provides a tentative account of some behavioral features of blindsight. Therefore, this surprisingly simple decision heuristic may inspire novel perspectives on metacognition and consciousness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Year:  2020        PMID: 32191072     DOI: 10.1037/rev0000184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  5 in total

1.  Are children's judgments of another's accuracy linked to their metacognitive confidence judgments?

Authors:  Carolyn Baer; Puja Malik; Darko Odic
Journal:  Metacogn Learn       Date:  2021-03-27

2.  The positive evidence bias in perceptual confidence is unlikely post-decisional.

Authors:  Jason Samaha; Rachel Denison
Journal:  Neurosci Conscious       Date:  2022-07-26

3.  On the assumptions behind metacognitive measurements: Implications for theory and practice.

Authors:  Kiyofumi Miyoshi; Yosuke Sakamoto; Shin'ya Nishida
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 2.004

4.  A little history goes a long way toward understanding why we study consciousness the way we do today.

Authors:  Joseph E LeDoux; Matthias Michel; Hakwan Lau
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Confirmation bias is adaptive when coupled with efficient metacognition.

Authors:  Max Rollwage; Stephen M Fleming
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 6.237

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.