| Literature DB >> 32190583 |
Eleni Papakonstantinou1,2, Flora Bacopoulou3, Vasileios Megalooikonomou4, Aspasia Efthimiadou5, Dimitrios Vlachakis1,2,6.
Abstract
To evaluate the potency of potential helicase modulators, we developed an assay of helicase enzyme activity. Using a DNA or RNA biotin labelled oligonucleotide and after the addition of a recombinant helicase, the nucleic acid unwinds, causing the emission of luminescence, which is quantified with a particular antibody. In our assay, one of the DNA oligos was biotinylated, while the other was labelled with digoxygenin (DIG), both in their 5' termini. The biotin molecule immobilises the DNA duplex on a neutravidin-coated plate and the helicase activity is measured through the unwinding of DNA, due to ATP activation. The subsequent release of DIG-labelled oligos results in a luminescence signal measured with a chemiluminescence antibody. Our goal was to provide a high throughput screening method for potential helicase inhibitors. The method described in this paper has been demonstrated to be fast, easy and reproducible and doesn't use radiochemicals.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32190583 PMCID: PMC7079759 DOI: 10.14806/ej.25.0.927
Source DB: PubMed Journal: EMBnet J ISSN: 2226-6089
Figure 1.The SDS gel (left) and western blot (right, anti-His-tag antibody, penta-His conjugated) for the HCV helicase protein.
Each enzymatic activity assay was performed in triplicate and the results were averaged. All reactions were allowed to proceed for 60 minutes (concentrations as described in the methods section).
| CHEMILUMINESENCE | |
|---|---|
| + DNA substrate − helicase − ATP | 0.532 (± 2%) |
| + DNA substrate − helicase + ATP | 0.529 (± 4%) |
| + DNA substrate + helicase − ATP | 0.525 (± 5%) |
| − DNA substrate + helicase + ATP | 0.040 (± 3%) |
Different DNA substrate concentrations (60-minute run).
| DNA (ng) immobilised per well | CHEMILUMINESENCE without ATP | CHEMILUMINESENCE with ATP |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.039 | 0.040 |
| 0.5 | 0.128 | 0.044 |
| 1 | 0.255 | 0.045 |
| 2 | 0.495 | 0.045 |
| 2.5 | 0.525 | 0.048 |
| 5 | 0.902 | 0.065 |
Figure 2.Graphical representation of Table 2 data.