| Literature DB >> 32190166 |
Yuwen Tang1, Zhiyou Peng2, Shoujun Tao3, Jianliang Sun3, Wenyuan Wang4, Xuejiao Guo2, Gonglu Liu5, Xianzhe Luo3, Yuan Chen3, Yue Shen6, Haixiang Ma7, Peng Xu3, Qinghua Li3, Honghai Zhang3, Zhiying Feng2.
Abstract
Vesicular glutamate transporter type 2 (VGLUT2) is known to play an important role in mediating heat hyperalgesia induced by inflammation. However, the underlying mechanism for this activity is poorly understood. Cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (Cdk5), serving as a key regulator in modulating release of glutamate, acted a key player in the formation of heat hyperalgesia of inflammatory pain. However, it remains unknown whether there is a bridge between Cdk5 and VGLUT2 for mediating inflammatory pain. Therefore, we designed the experiment to determine whether VGLUT2 signaling pathway is involved in inflammatory pain mediated by Cdk5 in the inflammatory pain model induced by complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA). Our results showed that the coexpression of Cdk5/VGLUT2 in small- and medium-sized neuronal cells of the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) and spinal cord between days 1 and 3 following subcutaneous injection of CFA was significantly increased. Moreover, our study revealed that the expression of VGLUT2 protein in the DRG and spinal cord was remarkably increased between days 1 and 3 following CFA injection and was significantly reduced by roscovitine, a selective antagonist of Cdk5. Additionally, p25 but not p35, an activator of Cdk5, protein was significantly increased by CFA and reduced by roscovitine. Our findings suggested that VGLUT2/Cdk5 signaling pathway contributes to inflammatory pain mediated by Cdk5/p25.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32190166 PMCID: PMC7066405 DOI: 10.1155/2020/4807674
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pain Res Manag ISSN: 1203-6765 Impact factor: 3.037
Figure 1Coexpression of Cdk5 and VGLUT2 was increased in the DRG neuronal cells. Double-immunofluorescence staining for Cdk5 (red) and VGLUT2 (green). Compared with the control group by intraplantar injection of saline (A–F), the coexpression of Cdk5 and VGLUT2 was significantly increased in DRG neurons in the group on day 1 following intraplantar injection of CFA (G–L). Data shown represent mean ± SEM; P < 0.01; n = 6/group.
Figure 2Coexpression of Cdk5 and VGLUT2 was increased in the spinal cord neuronal cells. Double-immunofluorescence staining for Cdk5 (red) and VGLUT2 (green). Compared with the control group by intraplantar injection of saline (A–F), the coexpression of Cdk5 and VGLUT2 was significantly increased in DRG neurons on day 1 following CFA injection (G–L). Data shown represent mean ± SEM; P < 0.01; n = 6/group.
Figure 3VGLUT2 protein expression was markedly increased in the DRG and reduced by roscovitine. Compared with the control group by intraplantar injection of saline, VGLUT2 expression was significantly increased from day 1 to day 3 following intraplantar injection of CFA. P < 0.05 and P < 0.01; n = 4/group A. Compared with the control group, by intrathecal injection of DMSO, the increased expression of VGLUT2 protein was significantly reduced by intrathecal injection of roscovitine between day 1 and day 3. Data shown represent mean ± SEM; P < 0.05; n = 4/group B.
Figure 4VGLUT2 protein expression was markedly increased in the spinal cord and reduced by roscovitine. Compared with the control group by intraplantar injection of saline, VGLUT2 expression was significantly increased from day 1 to day 3 after intraplantar injection of CFA. P < 0.05 and P < 0.01; n = 4/group A. Compared with the controls by intrathecal injection of DMSO, the increased expression of VGLUT2 protein was significantly reduced by intrathecal injection of roscovitine between day 1 and day 3 after intraplantar injection of CFA. Data shown represent mean ± SEM; P < 0.05; n = 4/group B.
Figure 5p25 but not p35 was markedly increased in the spinal cord. Compared with the control group treated with intraplantar injection of saline, p25 expression was significantly increased from day 1 after intraplantar injection of CFA. However, p35 expression was not significantly increased day 1 after intraplantar injection of CFA as compared with the control group treated with intraplantar injection of saline. Data shown represent mean ± SEM; P < 0.05; n = 4/group.
Figure 6p25 not p35 was significantly reduced by roscovitine via p25 not p35. Compared with controls by intrathecal injection of DMSO in the group treated with intraplantar injection of CFA, the increased expression of p25 protein was significantly reduced by intrathecal injection of roscovitine in the group treated with intraplantar injection of CFA day 1. However, the administration of roscovitine produced no significant effects on p35 protein expression in the same group. Data shown represent mean ± SEM; P < 0.05; n = 4/group B.