| Literature DB >> 32190148 |
Katarzyna Skonieczna1, Arkadiusz Jawień2, Andrzej Marszałek3,4, Tomasz Grzybowski1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: To date, several nuclear DNA variants have been shown to be associated with increased risk of developing colorectal cancer. Despite the fact that mitochondria play an important role in carcinogenesis, little is known about inherited mitochondrial DNA mutations that could be involved in this disease. Thus, potential associations between inherited mutations in the entire mitochondrial genomes and colorectal cancer were analysed in this study.Entities:
Keywords: colorectal cancer; hereditary mutations; mitochondrial genome; mtDNA; polymorphisms
Year: 2019 PMID: 32190148 PMCID: PMC7069428 DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2018.80893
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Med Sci ISSN: 1734-1922 Impact factor: 3.318
Associations between mtDNA haplogroups and colorectal cancer in a Polish population
| Haplogroups | Case group ( | Control group I ( | Control group II ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | 97.0 (97) | 85.0 (85) | 0.0066 | 0.0792 | 90.2 (1221) | 0.0387 | 0.4644 |
| HV | 48.0 (48) | 35.0 (35) | 0.0851 | 1.0000 | 41.2 (632) | 0.8844 | 1.0000 |
| H | 44.0 (44) | 35.0 (35) | 0.2472 | 1.0000 | 45.3 (568) | 0.7721 | 1.0000 |
| HV0 | 4.0 (4) | 0.0 (0) | 0.1297 | 1.0000 | 4.1 (55) | 0.8175 | 1.0000 |
| V | 3.0 (3) | 0.0 (0) | 0.2447 | 1.0000 | 4.0 (54) | 0.8214 | 1.0000 |
| J | 7.0 (7) | 8.0 (8) | 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 9.4 (118) | 0.6838 | 1.0000 |
| T: | 13.0 (13) | 13.0 (13) | 0.8335 | 1.0000 | 11.1 (139) | 0.4900 | 1.0000 |
| T1 | 2.0 (2) | 4.0 (4) | 0.6785 | 1.0000 | 2.5 (31) | 0.8735 | 1.0000 |
| T2 | 11.0 (11) | 9.0 (9) | 0.8137 | 1.0000 | 7.9 (107) | 0.3668 | 1.0000 |
| U: | 28.0 (28) | 26.0 (26) | 0.8735 | 1.0000 | 25.5 (319) | 0.3792 | 1.0000 |
| U1 | 1.0 (1) | 0.0 (0) | 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 0.5 (6) | 0.9782 | 1.0000 |
| U2 | 2.0 (2) | 1.0 (1) | 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 1.2 (15) | 0.7505 | 1.0000 |
| U3 | 1.0 (1) | 0.0 (0) | 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 1 (12) | 0.6640 | 1.0000 |
| U4 | 5.0 (5) | 10.0 (10) | 0.2829 | 1.0000 | 5.4 (68) | 0.8214 | 1.0000 |
| U5 | 13.0 (13) | 9.0 (9) | 0.4978 | 1.0000 | 12.1 (151) | 0.6912 | 1.0000 |
| U5a | 8.0 (8) | 6.0 (6) | 0.7817 | 1.0000 | 7.3 (92) | 0.8004 | 1.0000 |
| U5b | 5.0 (5) | 3.0 (3) | 0.7182 | 1.0000 | 4.7 (59) | 0.9616 | 1.0000 |
| U7 | 0.0 (0) | 0.0 (0) | 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 0.2 (2) | 0.3112 | 1.0000 |
| U8 | 7.0 (7) | 6.0 (6) | 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 4.7 (64) | 0.4380 | 1.0000 |
| K | 6.0 (6) | 5.0 (5) | 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 4.2 (53) | 0.4498 | 1.0000 |
| R0 | 0.0 (0) | 1.0 (1) | 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 0.5 (6) | 0.8881 | 1.0000 |
| I | 1.0 (1) | 1.0 (1) | 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 1.9 (26) | 0.7834 | 1.0000 |
| W | 2.0 (2) | 6.0 (6) | 0.2790 | 1.0000 | 3.5 (47) | 0.6165 | 1.0000 |
| N | 0.0 (0) | 2.0 (2) | 0.4773 | 1.0000 | 1.0 (14) | 0.6229 | 1.0000 |
| A | 0.0 (0) | 1.0 (1) | 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 0.1 (2) | 0.3112 | 1.0000 |
| C | 0.0 (0) | 1.0 (1) | 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 0.5 (7) | 0.9782 | 1.0000 |
| D | 0.0 (0) | 1.0 (1) | 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 0.2 (3) | 0.5028 | 1.0000 |
| E | 0.0 (0) | 0.0 (0) | 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 0.1 (1) | 0.0884 | 1.0000 |
| G | 0.0 (0) | 1.0 (1) | 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 0.3 (4) | 0.6567 | 1.0000 |
| M | 0.0 (0) | 0.0 (0) | 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 0.1 (1) | 0.0884 | 1.0000 |
| L | 0.0 (0) | 0.0 (0) | 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 0.3 (4) | 0.6567 | 1.0000 |
| X | 0.0 (0) | 2.0 (2) | 0.4773 | 1.0000 | 1.7 (23) | 0.3686 | 1.0000 |
Case group – 100 colorectal cancer patients for which mitogenome sequences were described by Skonieczna et al. [26]; control group I – 100 healthy persons from Polish population for which mitogenome sequences were described by Malyarchuk et al. [23]; control group II – general Polish population of 1353 individuals for which HVI and HVI regions were described by Malyarchuk et al. [23]; Malyarchuk et al. [24]; Grzybowski et al. [25] and Mielnik-Sikorska et al. [22]. Numbers of haplotypes belonging to specific haplogroups are in parentheses. Major haplogroups are shown in bold. Frequencies of each subhaplogroup within a particular major clade are added to the overall frequency of this major haplogroup. Statistical significance was calculated with the chi-square test with Yates’ correction.
Macrohaplogroup; pB – Bonferroni corrected p-values.