E Schiffner1, D Latz1, A Karbowski2, J P Grassmann1, S Thelen1, J Windolf1, P Jungbluth1, J Schneppendahl1. 1. Department of Trauma and Handsurgery, Heinrich Heine University Hospital Duesseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany. 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Krankenhaus der Augustinerinnen, Jakobstraße 27-31, 50678, Cologne, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: When revision surgery is needed in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) the most frequent reasons are aseptic loosening (AL) and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However preoperative distinction between AL and PJI remains challenging. Aim of this study is to determine the incidence of PJI in patients with suspected AL after TKA and to evaluate a diagnostic algorithm for reliable differential diagnosis. METHODS: In this study a total of 149 symptomatic patients with radiographic signs of prosthetic loosening and suspected AL were included. Preoperatively all patients underwent a standardized diagnostic algorithm. For each patient demographics, as well as the results of laboratory and microbiological testing were collected from the medical records. RESULTS: Of the included patients 117 (78.5%) were diagnosed with AL and 32 (21.5%) with PJI. The latency period from primary arthroplasty to the presentation with symptomatic implant loosening was significantly shorter for PJI compared to AL (p < 0.05). The initial CRP values were significantly higher in patients with PJI compared to patients with AL (p < 0.05). Elevated count of white blood cells or percentage of neutrophils within the synovial fluid support the diagnosis of PJI. The sensitivity of synovial cell count (CC) count for PJI in patients with radiographic signs of loosening was 0.84 (CI 0.81-0.87) with a specificity of 0.96 (CI 0.92-0.98). The single best measure for the diagnosis of PJI was synovial fluid cultures with a specificity of 1, however this measure provides poor sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Patients with radiographic signs of loosening in TKA need thorough diagnostics. Information about primary TKA, serological testing, and results of joint aspiration can rule out a PJI in most cases.
PURPOSE: When revision surgery is needed in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) the most frequent reasons are aseptic loosening (AL) and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However preoperative distinction between AL and PJI remains challenging. Aim of this study is to determine the incidence of PJI in patients with suspected AL after TKA and to evaluate a diagnostic algorithm for reliable differential diagnosis. METHODS: In this study a total of 149 symptomatic patients with radiographic signs of prosthetic loosening and suspected AL were included. Preoperatively all patients underwent a standardized diagnostic algorithm. For each patient demographics, as well as the results of laboratory and microbiological testing were collected from the medical records. RESULTS: Of the included patients 117 (78.5%) were diagnosed with AL and 32 (21.5%) with PJI. The latency period from primary arthroplasty to the presentation with symptomatic implant loosening was significantly shorter for PJI compared to AL (p < 0.05). The initial CRP values were significantly higher in patients with PJI compared to patients with AL (p < 0.05). Elevated count of white blood cells or percentage of neutrophils within the synovial fluid support the diagnosis of PJI. The sensitivity of synovial cell count (CC) count for PJI in patients with radiographic signs of loosening was 0.84 (CI 0.81-0.87) with a specificity of 0.96 (CI 0.92-0.98). The single best measure for the diagnosis of PJI was synovial fluid cultures with a specificity of 1, however this measure provides poor sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Patients with radiographic signs of loosening in TKA need thorough diagnostics. Information about primary TKA, serological testing, and results of joint aspiration can rule out a PJI in most cases.
Authors: Elie Berbari; Tad Mabry; Geoffrey Tsaras; Mark Spangehl; Pat J Erwin; Mohammad Hassan Murad; James Steckelberg; Douglas Osmon Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2010-09-01 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Benjamin Zmistowski; Craig Della Valle; Thomas W Bauer; Konstantinos N Malizos; Abbas Alavi; Hani Bedair; Robert E Booth; Peter Choong; Carl Deirmengian; Garth D Ehrlich; Anil Gambir; Ronald Huang; Yair Kissin; Hideo Kobayashi; Naomi Kobayashi; Veit Krenn; Drago Lorenzo; S B Marston; Geert Meermans; Javier Perez; J J Ploegmakers; Aaron Rosenberg; Peter Thomas; Stephan Tohtz; Jorge A Villafuerte; Peter Wahl; Frank-Christiaan Wagenaar; Eivind Witzo Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Javad Parvizi; Dong-Hun Suh; S Mehdi Jafari; Adam Mullan; James J Purtill Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2011-03-02 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Andrej Trampuz; Arlen D Hanssen; Douglas R Osmon; Jayawant Mandrekar; James M Steckelberg; Robin Patel Journal: Am J Med Date: 2004-10-15 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Pablo A Slullitel; José I Oñativia; Martin A Buttaro; Marisa L Sánchez; Fernando Comba; Gerardo Zanotti; Francisco Piccaluga Journal: EFORT Open Rev Date: 2018-07-17