Literature DB >> 32189918

Adipocytic tumors of orofacial region: Clinicopathologic appraisal of ten cases with a review of its variants.

Nivedita Kaorey1, Mandakini Mandale1, Jyoti Bhavthankar1.   

Abstract

Lipomas are the most common benign tumors. However, their presence in oral cavity is albeit erratic. Even scarcer is the prevalence of the various histopathological variants. We, hereby, report the wide range of clinical and histopathologic presentations of these uncommon entities affecting the orofacial region. Discussed herein are six cases of lipomas, two cases of intramuscular lipomas and one case each of osteolipoma and sialolipoma. Copyright:
© 2020 Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adipocytic tumors; intramuscular/infiltrating lipoma; lipoma; osteolipoma; sialolipoma

Year:  2020        PMID: 32189918      PMCID: PMC7069150          DOI: 10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_8_20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Pathol        ISSN: 0973-029X


INTRODUCTION

Adipocytic tumors of the oral cavity are most commonly represented as lipomas or herniation of the buccal fat pad.[1] Lipomas are the most common mesenchymal neoplasms normally affecting the trunk and proximal portion of extremities.[2] Fifteen percent of lipomas are found in the head-and-neck region with posterior cervical subcutaneous tissue being the most common site in this span.[3] The overall incidence reported in the oral cavity is 4.4%.[2] Histologically, it is indistinguishable from normal adipose tissue. Sometimes, these benign tumors contain other mature cell populations such as fibrous, osseous, chondroid and vascular and muscle tissues. Gnepp classified these as simple lipoma, and other variants as fibrolipoma, spindle cell lipoma, intramuscular or infiltrating lipoma, angiolipoma, salivary gland lipoma (sialolipoma), pleomorphic lipoma and myxoid and atypical lipomas.[4] These variants are few and far in between. With this context, the aim of the current study was to evaluate the clinical and histopathological features of lipoma cases reported in the past 10 years. This review also deliberates upon some of the histologic variants that were identified during the evaluation.

CASE REPORT

Archives from the Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology of the institute spanning from 2008 to 2019 were retrieved, and all cases with histopathological diagnosis of lipoma of the oral cavity were recovered. Data pertaining to patients' gender and age, site, size and duration of the lesions before diagnosis, clinical diagnosis, follow-up and recurrence were obtained from the patients' records. Table 1 gives the detailed demographic, clinical and histopathologic findings of the study cases.
Table 1

Demographic, clinical and histopathological findings of the study cases

Age/sexNumberSiteSize (in cm)Duration (in years)Clinical diagnosisHistopathologic variantRecurrenceSimilar lesions elsewhere
56/femaleSingleLeft buccal vestibule2×23Benign soft-tissue tumorSimple lipomaNone up to 2 yearsNone
71/femaleSingleRight mandibular alveolus3×315Bony exostosisOsteolipomaNone up to 2 yearsNone
32/femaleSingleSubmental region4×41Submental lymphadenopathyIntramuscular lipomaNone up to 4 yearsNone
24/maleMultipleOrofacial regionRanging from 1 cm to 3-4 cm diameter12-13Multiple lipomas/neurofibromatosisSimple lipomaMultiple recurrences noted over past 10 yearsNeck, upper and lower limbs, back
60/femaleSingleRetromolar region1×0.820FibromaSimple lipomaNone up to 10 yearsNone
45/femaleSingleRight Buccal mucosa2×11-2Benign soft-tissue tumorSimple lipomaNone up to 6 yearsNone
29/femaleSingleRight midface region26LipomaIntramuscular lipomaRecurrence after 2 yearsNone
60/femalesingleLeft alveolar mucosa1×0.50.6LipomaSimple lipomaNone up to 3 yearsNone
44/maleSingleRight preauricular region3×45Benign salivary gland neoplasmSialolipomaNone up to 10 yearsNone
13/maleSingleLeft lower lip1×0.72MucoceleSimple lipomaNone up to 5 yearsNone
Demographic, clinical and histopathological findings of the study cases All hematoxylin and eosin stained slides were reviewed and classified as proposed by Gnepp, 2001.[4] The data were assessed and subjected to simple descriptive statistics. The patients' ages varied from the second to seventh decade. Female predilection was noted with the male: female ratio being 3:7. 6 among ten cases showed intraoral location, whereas four were located extraorally. Among the intraoral sites, buccal mucosa and alveolus were involved in two cases each, followed by one case each affecting retromolar trigone and lower labial mucosa. Extraoral sites included midface region, parotid region and submental area. Histopathologically, six cases were simple lipoma, two intramuscular lipomas and one case each of sialolipoma and osteolipoma. Only one case showed multiple lesions, and rest all were solitary lipomas. The recurrence was observed in two cases. Figures 1 and 2 shows the clinical and gross presentation of the lipomas and Figure 3 depicts their microscopic appearances.
Figure 1

Clinical images show (a) Smooth sessile swelling on the left buccal mucosa. (b) Diffuse swelling on the right midface region. (c) Macroscopic appearance of buccal mucosal swelling - cut section reveals wall enclosing yellow shiny content. (d) Macroscopic appearance of midface swelling - irregular surface with severed muscle attachment

Figure 2

(a) Macroscopic appearance of simple lipoma showing smooth, slightly lobulated surface. (b) Cut surface of simple lipoma showing yellow, glossy, oligenous surface. (c) Cut surface of osteolipoma showing peripheral bony wall and core containing bony septae filled with lipogenous tissue

Figure 3

Histopathological images show H and E, ×100. (a) Aggregates of clear large round cells with eccentrically pushed nucleus divided by fibrovascular septa (simple lipoma). (b) Irregular trabeculae of woven bone interspersed with numerous adipocytes (osteolipoma). (c) lesional area showing serous salivary gland acini, ductal components and aggregates of adipocytes within fibrovascular stroma (sialolipoma). (d) Transverse and longitudinally cut sections of striated muscle fibers infiltrated with adipose tissue (intramuscular lipoma)

Clinical images show (a) Smooth sessile swelling on the left buccal mucosa. (b) Diffuse swelling on the right midface region. (c) Macroscopic appearance of buccal mucosal swelling - cut section reveals wall enclosing yellow shiny content. (d) Macroscopic appearance of midface swelling - irregular surface with severed muscle attachment (a) Macroscopic appearance of simple lipoma showing smooth, slightly lobulated surface. (b) Cut surface of simple lipoma showing yellow, glossy, oligenous surface. (c) Cut surface of osteolipoma showing peripheral bony wall and core containing bony septae filled with lipogenous tissue Histopathological images show H and E, ×100. (a) Aggregates of clear large round cells with eccentrically pushed nucleus divided by fibrovascular septa (simple lipoma). (b) Irregular trabeculae of woven bone interspersed with numerous adipocytes (osteolipoma). (c) lesional area showing serous salivary gland acini, ductal components and aggregates of adipocytes within fibrovascular stroma (sialolipoma). (d) Transverse and longitudinally cut sections of striated muscle fibers infiltrated with adipose tissue (intramuscular lipoma)

DISCUSSION

Physiologic reserves of adipose tissue are commonly encountered in submucosa of cheek, tongue and anterolateral part of the hard palate. The adipocytic tumors or the lipomas of the oral cavity are mesenchymal tumors with mature adipose tissue predominance. This adipose tissue component of neoplasms, although structurally similar to normal fat cells, differs metabolically as it cannot be utilized for energy generation during starvation periods as happens with normal adipose tissue.[5] Initial portrayal of an oral lipoma was provided by Roux (1848), as an alveolar mass which he denoted as “yellow epulis.”[6] About 15%–20% of these tumors are testified in the head-and-neck region, with oral cavity involvement observed in 1%–4% of those cases.[78] Patients are often asymptomatic and present with a yellowish submucosal mass that may be sessile or pedunculated. It may vary in size, from small masse to large fat lesions. Tongue, mouth floor, buccal mucosa, vestibule, palate, lips and gums are the most common sites, in sliding order.[9] In our observation, buccal mucosa and alveolus were the most commonly affected sites intraorally, whereas the midface region was more pervasive extraorally. Histologic variants of lipoma include adenolipoma of skin, angiolipoma, cartilaginous metaplasia in a lipoma, chondroid lipoma, fibrolipoma, myelolipoma, myolipoma, myxolipoma, ossifying lipoma and sclerotic lipoma. Variants based on the location include intermuscular lipoma, intramuscular lipoma, parosteal/periosteal lipoma, lipoma arborescens (synovial lipomatosis) and multiple lipomas.[10] The most widely acknowledged theory for the pathogenesis of lipoma is the “metaplastic theory” which postulates that lipomatous proliferation occurs due to the anomalous differentiation of in situ mesenchymal cells into lipoblasts, as adipose tissue can be derived from mutable connective tissue cells at more or less any topographic location in the body. Some authors have also proposed that these are congenital lesions originate from embryonic multipotential cells that remain occultly dormant until they differentiate into fat cells under favorable influence such as hormonal stimuli during adolescence, trauma and chronic inflammation.[111213] Osteolipomas represent <1% of cases. Even fewer cases have been recounted in the oral cavity with the tongue and lower lip being the commonly affected sites. Further involved sites included the hard palate and the buccal mucosa.[1415] Age and gender predilections have been inconsistent; however, almost all of the reported cases were in later life. Our case showed involvement of the alveolar area which is first reported in this region. Osteolipoma also shares its origin on a similar basis of multipotency of mesenchymal cells and potential for metaplastic derivation. Among the two widely cited theories, the first model revolves around the multidirectional differentiation of multipotent mesenchymal cells that justifies the close resemblance of ossifying lipoma to mesenchymoma. Thus, the gist of this concept is that lipoma with osseous tissue is the consequence of bivalent mesenchymal differentiation into bone and adipose tissues since both the tumor components are discontinuous within the mass.[16] The second doctrine is more in favor of metaplasia of fibrous elements into osseous tissue, ancillary to the existing simple lipoma. This metaplasia is attributed to various external factors such as mechanical stress, repeated trauma or ischemia.[17] Apart from these two suppositions, it has also been suggested that osteolipomas arise due to mediators released by monocytes in the circulation that induce the transformation of fibroblasts into osteoblasts or perhaps due to a scant nutritional supply in the center of a large lipoma.[1718] Chromosomal abnormalities of 12q14–15,6p and 13q9 have also been inferred as a possible etiology.[3] Sialolipoma is a comparatively newfound histological variant of lipoma characterized by benign salivary gland parenchyma interspersed with mature adipose tissue.[19] Its pathogenesis may be correlated with salivary gland dysfunction that may modify the salivary gland structure. This alteration may result in substitution of normal salivary gland tissue with mature adipose tissue together with atrophic salivary glandular elements and/or chronic ductal epithelial changes such as oncocytic metaplasia, fibrosis and lymphocytic infiltrate.[20] The third variant we came across was intramuscular/infiltrating lipoma. These are the deep-seated variants that are localized deep under the enclosing fascia.[21] Intramuscular lipoma is another uncommon condition that represents just over 1.8% of all primary tumors of adipose tissue and <1% of all lipomas.[22] In the orofacial regions, the involvement of different muscles such as tongue, cheek, orbicularis muscle and temporalis muscle has been described with the tongue being one of the most commonly involved sites.[21] In our study, the midface region and submental region were involved. The pathogenesis of intramuscular lipoma is assumed to be similar to other lipoma subtypes.[23] Immunohistochemical evaluation of different variants using Ki-67 and PCNA was done by Naruse et al. PCNA and ki-67 were detected in the nuclei of mature fat cells. They found the expression in fibrolipomas and intramuscular lipomas to be higher than classic lipomas. However, no significant difference was observed in their behavior postoperatively.[2] Stojanov et al. (2019) employed MDM2 and CDK4 immunohistochemical expression in adipocytic tumors in conjunction with the histiocytic marker to avoid overdiagnosis of lipomas as atypical lipomatous tumor.[1] White fat in lipoma can be differentiated from brown fat in hibernoma through immunohistochemistry as adipose cells in lipomas are positive for S-100α and S-100 β, whereas tumor cells in hibernoma display an intense positive staining for CD319.[7] The treatment advocated for all lipomas is simple excision as recurrence is rare with these entities. An exception to this is the intramuscular variant, wherein a recurrence rate between 3% and 62.5% has been reported.[21] Newer treatment modalities are in pipeline as a prospective approach, which have included photodynamic therapy with the help of endoscopic device which facilitates delivery of inducing factors, such as ultraviolet light, interleukin 1, tumor necrosis factor and dexamethasone, are brought into contact with undesired fat cells.[19] A new inkling worth pondering has arose with the advent of adipokines such as leptin. Tissue engineers are considering these adipose tissue reserves as a source of adult stromal/stem cells which can be harvested by collagenase digestion. The multipotency has bestowed them with the ability to differentiate through the adipocyte, chondrocyte, osteoblast and other lineage pathways implying their role in regenerative therapies. These adipose cells also discharge numerous cytokines and growth factors with possible paracrine actions, thus insinuating their role in treating diabetic conditions. Furthermore, adipocytes have exhibited immunomodulatory functions when added to mixed lymphocyte reactions, cueing that they may be transplanted allogeneically.[20] Thus, a new prospect has been unwrapped to view these adipocytic entities in a different light.

CONCLUSION

Not only are the adipocytic tumors of the oral cavity unusual entities afflicting the oral cavity, their utility in therapeutics can also not be refuted. Thus, careful diagnosis of these lesions may provide some insight in the field of therapeutics in future.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  17 in total

1.  Intramuscular and intermuscular lipoma: neglected diagnoses.

Authors:  C D Fletcher; E Martin-Bates
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 5.087

2.  Two entities in angiolipoma. A study of 459 cases of lipoma with review of literature on infiltrating angiolipoma.

Authors:  J J Lin; F Lin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Sialolipoma: a report of seven cases of a new variant of salivary gland lipoma.

Authors:  T Nagao; I Sugano; Y Ishida; A Asoh; S Munakata; K Yamazaki; A Konno; Y Kondo; K Nagao
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.087

4.  Lipomas and fibrolipomas of the oral cavity.

Authors:  J G de Visscher
Journal:  J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1982-08

5.  Ossifying lipoma of the thigh.

Authors:  E J Heffernan; K Lefaivre; P L Munk; T O Nielsen; B A Masri
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Ossifying lipoma.

Authors:  J D Blanshard; D Veitch
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 1.469

7.  Lipomas of the oral cavity: clinical findings, histological classification and proliferative activity of 46 cases.

Authors:  E R Fregnani; F R Pires; R Falzoni; M A Lopes; P A Vargas
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.789

8.  [Intramuscular lipomas: Large and deep benign lumps not to underestimated. Review of a series of 51 cases].

Authors:  L R Ramos-Pascua; O A Guerra-Álvarez; S Sánchez-Herráez; F M Izquierdo-García; J Á Maderuelo-Fernández
Journal:  Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol       Date:  2013-10-30

Review 9.  Intramuscular lipoma: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Shane McTighe; Ivan Chernev
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2014-12-16

10.  Intraoral lipoma: a case report.

Authors:  L K Surej Kumar; Nikhil Mathew Kurien; Varun B Raghavan; P Varun Menon; Sherin A Khalam
Journal:  Case Rep Med       Date:  2014-01-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.