Literature DB >> 32189607

Evaluation of measurement equivalence of the Family Satisfaction with the End-of-Life Care (FAMCARE): Tests of differential item functioning between Hispanic and non-Hispanic White caregivers.

Jeanne A Teresi1,2,3,4, Katja Ocepek-Welikson1, Mildred Ramirez1,2,4, Marjorie Kleinman3, Katherine Ornstein5, Albert Siu6, Jose Luchsinger7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although the psychometric properties of the Family Satisfaction with End-of-Life Care measure have been examined in diverse settings internationally; little evidence exists regarding measurement equivalence in Hispanic caregivers. The aim was to examine the psychometric properties of a short-form of the FAMCARE in Hispanics using latent variable models and place information on differential item functioning (DIF) in an existing family satisfaction item bank.
METHOD: The graded form of the item response theory model was used for the analyses of DIF; sensitivity analyses were performed using a latent variable logistic regression approach. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses to examine dimensionality were performed within each subgroup studied. The sample included 1,834 respondents: 317 Hispanic and 1,517 non-Hispanic White caregivers of patients with Alzheimer's disease and cancer, respectively.
RESULTS: There was strong support for essential unidimensionality for both Hispanic and non-Hispanic White subgroups. Modest DIF of low magnitude and impact was observed; flagged items related to information sharing. Only 1 item was flagged with significant DIF by both a primary and sensitivity method after correction for multiple comparisons: "The way the family is included in treatment and care decisions." This item was more discriminating for the non-Hispanic, White responders than for the Hispanic subsample, and was also a more severe indicator at some levels of the trait; the Hispanic respondents located at higher satisfaction levels were more likely than White non-Hispanic respondents to report satisfaction. SIGNIFICANCE OF
RESULTS: The magnitude of DIF was below the salience threshold for all items. Evidence supported the measurement equivalence and use for cross-cultural comparisons of the short-form FAMCARE among Hispanic caregivers, including those interviewed in Spanish.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Differential item functioning; Ethnic diversity; Family satisfaction with end-of-life care; Item response theory; Palliative care

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32189607      PMCID: PMC8104328          DOI: 10.1017/S1478951520000152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Palliat Support Care        ISSN: 1478-9515


  27 in total

1.  Factor analysis and internal consistency evaluation of the FAMCARE scale for use in the long-term care setting.

Authors:  Keri L Rodriguez; Nichole K Bayliss; Emily Jaffe; Susan Zickmund; Mary Ann Sevick
Journal:  Palliat Support Care       Date:  2010-03-24

2.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models.

Authors:  P M Bentler
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Indicators of quality of palliative care from a family perspective.

Authors:  L J Kristjanson
Journal:  J Palliat Care       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 2.250

Review 4.  Item and scale differential functioning of the Mini-Mental State Exam assessed using the Differential Item and Test Functioning (DFIT) Framework.

Authors:  Leo S Morales; Claudia Flowers; Peter Gutierrez; Marjorie Kleinman; Jeanne A Teresi
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Differential item functioning magnitude and impact measures from item response theory models.

Authors:  Marjorie Kleinman; Jeanne A Teresi
Journal:  Psychol Test Assess Model       Date:  2016

Review 6.  Validity and reliability testing of the FAMCARE Scale: measuring family satisfaction with advanced cancer care.

Authors:  L J Kristjanson
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  [Development of a Japanese Version of the Short-Form FAMCARE Scale for family caregivers of terminal cancer patients at home in Japan].

Authors:  Eriko Ito; Etsuko Tadaka
Journal:  Nihon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi       Date:  2018

8.  Translation and Testing of the Italian Version of FAMCARE-2: Measuring Family Caregivers' Satisfaction With Palliative Care.

Authors:  Daniela D'Angelo; Antonella Cinzia Punziano; Chiara Mastroianni; Annamaria Marzi; Roberto Latina; Valerio Ghezzi; Michela Piredda; Maria Grazia De Marinis
Journal:  J Fam Nurs       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 3.818

Review 9.  The unequal burden of pain: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in pain.

Authors:  Carmen R Green; Karen O Anderson; Tamara A Baker; Lisa C Campbell; Sheila Decker; Roger B Fillingim; Donna A Kalauokalani; Donna A Kaloukalani; Kathyrn E Lasch; Cynthia Myers; Raymond C Tait; Knox H Todd; April H Vallerand
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.750

10.  Having a fit: impact of number of items and distribution of data on traditional criteria for assessing IRT's unidimensionality assumption.

Authors:  Karon F Cook; Michael A Kallen; Dagmar Amtmann
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 4.147

View more
  1 in total

1.  Fighting racism in research.

Authors:  Gil Goldzweig; Allison Applebaum; Gian Domenico Borasio; Juhee Cho; Harvey Max Chochinov; Mayumi Ishida; Matthew Loscalzo; William Breitbart
Journal:  Palliat Support Care       Date:  2021-10
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.