| Literature DB >> 32189468 |
Wenxin Tian1, Xiao Li1, Hongfeng Tong2, Wenhan Weng1, Fan Yang1, Guanchao Jiang1, Jun Wang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the surgical effect and prognostic factors of extended thymectomy for myasthenia gravis (MG) patients with thymomas.Entities:
Keywords: Myasthenia gravis; prognosis; thymectomy; thymoma
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32189468 PMCID: PMC7180567 DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.13396
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Thorac Cancer ISSN: 1759-7706 Impact factor: 3.500
Demographic, perioperative, and pathological data
| Variable | |
|---|---|
| Age (years), mean ± SD | 49.9 ± 12.8 |
| Sex, male/female | 99/95 |
| Diameter (cm), mean ± SD | 4.4 ± 2.0 |
| Surgical procedure, n (%) | |
| VATS | 137 (70.6%) |
| Sternotomy | 57 (29.4%) |
| Operation time (minutes), mean ± SD | 136.6 ± 46.5 |
| Blood loss (mL), mean ± SD | 129.3 ± 287.4 |
| Postoperative drainage (days), mean ± SD | 3.3 ± 1.6 |
| Length of postoperative stay (days), mean ± SD | 8.3 ± 7.4 |
| Osserman classification, n (%) | |
| I | 56 (28.9%) |
| IIa | 52 (26.8%) |
| IIb | 67 (34.5%) |
| III | 14 (7.2%) |
| IV | 5 (2.6%) |
| Masaoka stage, n (%) | |
| I | 58 (29.9%) |
| II | 86 (44.3%) |
| III | 35 (18.0%) |
| IVa | 15 (7.7%) |
| World Health Organization classification, n (%) | |
| A | 1 (0.52%) |
| AB | 42 (21.6%) |
| B1 | 43 (22.2%) |
| B2 | 69 (35.6%) |
| B3 | 13 (6.70%) |
| Mixed B types | 25 (12.9%) |
| MNT | 1 (0.52%) |
| Resection status, n (%) | |
| R0 | 184 (94.8%) |
| R1 | 7 (3.6%) |
| R2 | 3 (1.5%) |
| Perioperative complications, n | |
| Myasthenic crisis | 20 |
| Bleeding | 2 |
| Deep vein thrombosis | 4 |
| Cardiac events | 6 |
| Diaphragmatic paralysis | 1 |
| Pneumonia | 1 |
MNT, micronodular thymoma with lymphoid.
Comparison of clinical and perioperative data between VATS and transsternal group
| Variable | VATS | Transsternal |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 137 | 57 | ||
| Age (years), mean ± SD | 50.8 ± 12.3 | 47.8 ± 13.7 | 1.526 | 0.129 |
| Sex (male/female) | 68/69 | 31/26 | 0.364 | 0.547 |
| Diameter (cm) | 3.8 ± 1.6 | 6.0 ± 2.0 | −8.009 | 0.000 |
| Operation time (min), mean ± SD | 137.6 ± 44.3 | 134.3 ± 51.6 | 0.448 | 0.654 |
| Blood loss (mL), mean ± SD | 92.4 ± 194.6 | 217.4 ± 425.3 | −2.805 | 0.006 |
| Postoperative drainage (days), mean ± SD | 3.1 ± 1.5 | 3.7 ± 1.9 | −2.195 | 0.029 |
| Postoperative stay (days), mean ± SD | 6.7 ± 3.6 | 12.2 ± 11.7 | −5.003 | 0.000 |
| MG Osserman classification, n (%) | ||||
| I + IIa | 85 (62.0%) | 23 (40.4%) | 7.676 | 0.006 |
| IIb + III + IV | 52 (38.0%) | 34 (59.6%) | ||
| Masaoka stage | ||||
| I + II | 114 (83.2%) | 30 (52.6%) | 19.676 | 0.000 |
| III + IVa | 23 (16.8%) | 27 (47.4%) | ||
| WHO classification, n (%) | ||||
| A + AB+MNT | 34 (24.8%) | 9 (15.8%) | 5.788 | 0.447 |
| B‐types | 103 (75.2%) | 48 (84.2%) | ||
| Complications | 18 (13.1%) | 18 (31.6%) | 9.057 | 0.003 |
Figure 1Survival curve of MG patients with thymoma. (a) Survival curve of whole group () survival curve, and () censored, and (b) Survival curve of two groups with different procedures (P = 0.109) surgical procedure, () transsternal, () VATS, () transsternal‐censored, and () VATS‐censored.
Cox regression analysis of risk factors for overall survival
| Variable | HR | 95% CI |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (continuous variable) | 1.068 | 1.011–1.129 |
|
| Sex | 0.633 | ||
| Female | Reference | — | |
| Male | 0.733 | 0.205–2.624 | |
| Osserman classification | 0.636 | ||
| I + IIa | Reference | — | |
| IIb + III + IV | 1.37 | 0.372–5.043 | |
| Resection status | 0.468 | ||
| R0 resection | Reference | — | |
| R1/2 resection | 1.802 | 0.368–8.830 | |
| Surgical procedure | 0.586 | ||
| Transsternum | Reference | — | |
| VATS | 1.502 | 0.348–6.493 | |
| Masaoka |
| ||
| I + II | Reference | — | |
| III + IV | 8.584 | 1.717–42.907 | |
| Complication | 0.778 | ||
| No | Reference | — | |
| Yes | 1.261 | 0.252–6.304 | |
| WHO type | 0.565 | ||
| A + AB+MNT | Reference | — | |
| B‐types | 0.583 | 0.093–3.664 | |
| Postoperative therapy | 0.101 | ||
| No | Reference | — | |
| Yes | 0.186 | 0.025–1.386 | |
| Tumor recurrence |
| ||
| No | Reference | — | |
| Yes | 66.592 | 5.546–799.511 |
P‐values < 0.05 are in bold font.
Cox regression analysis of risk factors of tumor recurrence
| Variable | HR | 95% CI |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (continuous variable) | 0.91 | 0.849–0.976 | 0.009 |
| Sex | 0.236 | ||
| Female | Reference | — | |
| Male | 2.682 | 0.524–13.725 | |
| Osserman classification | 0.569 | ||
| I + IIa | Reference | — | |
| IIb + III + IV | 1.529 | 0.355–6.580 | |
| Resection status | 0.811 | ||
| R0 resection | Reference | — | |
| Non‐R0 resection | 1.252 | 0.200–7.843 | |
| Surgical procedure | 0.698 | ||
| Transsternum | Reference | — | |
| VATS | 0.707 | 0.123–4.076 | |
| Masaoka |
| ||
| I + II | Reference | — | |
| III + IV | 13.126 | 2.066–83.408 | |
| Complication | 0.462 | ||
| No | Reference | — | |
| Yes | 0.47 | 0.063–3.520 | |
| WHO type | 0.97 | ||
| A + AB+MNT | Reference | — | |
| B‐types | 81 341.079 | 0.000–6.50E261 | |
| Postoperative therapy | 0.346 | ||
| No | Reference | — | |
| Yes | 3.728 | 0.241–57.575 |
P‐values < 0.05 are in bold font.
Univariable and multivariable analysis of risk factors of POMC
| Univariate model | Multivariate model | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | OR | 95% CI |
| OR | 95% CI |
|
| Age | 1.003 | 0.967–1.041 | 0.871 | — | — | — |
| Sex | 2.242 | 0.815–6.167 | 0.118 | — | — | — |
| Osserman (IIb + III + IV) | 8.000 | 2.247–28.477 |
| 6.541 | 1.732–24.698 |
|
| Masaoka (III + IV) | 2.536 | 0.954–6.743 | 0.062 | 0.986 | 0.298–3.259 | 0.982 |
| WHO (B‐types) | 5.864 | 0.760–45.224 | 0.09 | 2.994 | 0.364–24.598 | 0.307 |
| Surgical procedure | 3.026 | 1.158–7.908 |
| 0.533 | 0.182–1.566 | 0.253 |
| Surgery time | 1.008 | 0.999–1.017 | 0.087 | 1.006 | 0.994–1.017 | 0.338 |
| Blood loss | 1.001 | 1.000–1.002 |
| 1.001 | 0.999–1.002 | 0.358 |
| Postoperative therapy | 0.900 | 0.330–2.453 | 0.837 | — | — | — |
| R0‐resection | 1.025 | 0.123–8.558 | 0.982 | — | — | — |
P‐values < 0.05 are in bold font.
Figure 2The cumulative CSR rate after surgical resection. (a) CSR of the whole group () CSR curve, and () censored, and (b) Comparison of CSR rate between VATS group and transsternal group (P = 0.751) surgical procedure, () transsternal, () VATS, () transsternal‐censored, and () VATS‐censored.
Cox regression analysis of risk factors for CSR
| Variable | HR | 95% CI |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (continuous variable) | 0.971 | 0.949–0.994 | 0.012 |
| Sex | 0.657 | ||
| Female | Reference | — | |
| Male | 1.136 | 0.648–1.989 | |
| Osserman classification | 0.382 | ||
| I + IIa | Reference | — | |
| IIb + III + IV | 0.765 | 0.419–1.396 | |
| Resection status | 0.554 | ||
| R0 resection | Reference | — | |
| Non‐R0 resection | 1.523 | 0.378–6.141 | |
| Surgical procedure | 0.422 | ||
| Transsternum | Reference | — | |
| VATS | 1.288 | 0.694–2.388 | |
| Masaoka | 0.664 | ||
| I + II | Reference | — | |
| III + IV | 0.823 | 0.343–1.978 | |
| WHO type |
| ||
| A + AB+MNT | Reference | — | |
| B‐types | 0.479 | 0.252–0.909 | |
| Postoperative therapy | 0.295 | ||
| No | Reference | — | |
| Yes | 1.392 | 0.749–2.584 |
P‐values < 0.05 are in bold font.