Literature DB >> 32189181

Placental histopathology in IVF pregnancies resulting from the transfer of frozen-thawed embryos compared with fresh embryos.

Yossi Mizrachi1,2, Ariel Weissman3,4, Gili Buchnik Fater3,4, Maya Torem3,4, Eran Horowitz3,4, Letizia Schreiber4,5, Arieh Raziel3,4, Jacob Bar3,4, Michal Kovo3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study whether placentas of singleton pregnancies conceived after fresh embryo transfer (ET) contain more histopathological lesions compared with placentas of singleton pregnancies conceived after frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET).
METHODS: A prospective cohort study of placental histopathology in 131 women with singleton IVF pregnancies who delivered at a single medical center, between December 2017 and May 2019. The prevalence of different placental histopathology lesions was compared between women who conceived after fresh ET and FET.
RESULTS: Women who conceived after fresh ET (n = 74) did not differ from women who conceived after FET (n = 57) with regard to maternal age, BMI, nulliparity, or infertility diagnosis. Gestational week at delivery was lower in pregnancies conceived after fresh ET (38.5 vs. 39.2 weeks, respectively, p = 0.04), and a trend for a lower birthweight following fresh ET was noted (3040 vs. 3216 g, respectively, p = 0.053). However, placental histopathology analysis from pregnancies conceived after fresh ET was comparable to pregnancies conceived after FET, with regard to the prevalence of maternal vascular malperfusion lesions (45.9% vs. 50.9%, respectively, p = 0.57), fetal vascular malperfusion lesions (17.6% vs. 21.1, p = 0.61), acute inflammatory response lesions (28.4% vs. 28.1%, respectively, p = 0.96), and chronic inflammatory response lesions (13.5% vs. 8.8%, respectively, p = 0.48).
CONCLUSION: Placental histopathology did not differ between IVF pregnancies conceived after fresh and frozen ET. These results are reassuring for clinicians and patients who wish to pursue with transferring fresh embryos.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fresh embryo transfer; Frozen embryo transfer; IVF; Pathology; Placenta

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32189181      PMCID: PMC7244693          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-01741-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  31 in total

Review 1.  The "Great Obstetrical Syndromes" are associated with disorders of deep placentation.

Authors:  Ivo Brosens; Robert Pijnenborg; Lisbeth Vercruysse; Roberto Romero
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-11-20       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  No difference in congenital anomalies prevalence irrespective of insemination methods and freezing procedure: cohort study over fourteen years of an ART population in the south of France.

Authors:  Any Beltran Anzola; Vanessa Pauly; Debbie Montjean; Line Meddeb; Cendrine Geoffroy-Siraudin; Roland Sambuc; Pierre Boyer; Marie-José Gervoise-Boyer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  Is frozen embryo transfer better for mothers and babies? Can cumulative meta-analysis provide a definitive answer?

Authors:  Abha Maheshwari; Shilpi Pandey; Edwin Amalraj Raja; Ashalatha Shetty; Mark Hamilton; Siladitya Bhattacharya
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 15.610

4.  Maternal Cardiovascular Dysregulation During Early Pregnancy After In Vitro Fertilization Cycles in the Absence of a Corpus Luteum.

Authors:  Kirk P Conrad; John W Petersen; Yueh-Yun Chi; Xiaoman Zhai; Minjie Li; Kuei-Hsun Chiu; Jing Liu; Melissa D Lingis; R Stan Williams; Alice Rhoton-Vlasak; Joseph J Larocca; Wilmer W Nichols; Mark S Segal
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 10.190

5.  Risk of ischemic placental disease in fresh and frozen embryo transfer cycles.

Authors:  Katherine M Johnson; Michele R Hacker; Nina Resetkova; Barbara O'Brien; Anna M Modest
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 6.  Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of frozen thawed versus fresh embryos generated through in vitro fertilization treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Abha Maheshwari; Shilpi Pandey; Ashalatha Shetty; Mark Hamilton; Siladitya Bhattacharya
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  ART in Europe, 2014: results generated from European registries by ESHRE: The European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE).

Authors:  Ch De Geyter; C Calhaz-Jorge; M S Kupka; C Wyns; E Mocanu; T Motrenko; G Scaravelli; J Smeenk; S Vidakovic; V Goossens
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 8.  Systematic review of worldwide trends in assisted reproductive technology 2004-2013.

Authors:  Vitaly A Kushnir; David H Barad; David F Albertini; Sarah K Darmon; Norbert Gleicher
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 5.211

Review 9.  Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance.

Authors:  Laura Rienzi; Clarisa Gracia; Roberta Maggiulli; Andrew R LaBarbera; Daniel J Kaser; Filippo M Ubaldi; Sheryl Vanderpoel; Catherine Racowsky
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 15.610

Review 10.  Which one has a better obstetric and perinatal outcome in singleton pregnancy, IVF/ICSI or FET?: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  J Zhao; B Xu; Q Zhang; Y P Li
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 5.211

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Secretory products of the corpus luteum and preeclampsia.

Authors:  María M Pereira; Monica Mainigi; Jerome F Strauss
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 15.610

2.  Which is better for mothers and babies: fresh or frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer?

Authors:  Meiling Yang; Li Lin; Chunli Sha; Taoqiong Li; Wujiang Gao; Lu Chen; Ying Wu; Yanping Ma; Xiaolan Zhu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 3.007

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.