Elias M Klemperer1,2, John R Hughes1,2, Catherine E Peasley-Miklus1, Peter W Callas3, Jessica W Cook4, Joanna M Streck1,2,5, Nicolas E Morley1. 1. Vermont Center on Behavior & Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT. 2. Department of Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT. 3. Department of Biostatistics, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT. 4. Department of Medicine, William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI. 5. Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Most descriptions of tobacco withdrawal have not changed in >30 years despite new research. This meta-analysis tested whether abstinence leads to decreased positive affect (PA) because abstinence-induced symptom changes are a core feature of the tobacco withdrawal syndrome. In addition, we examined whether reduced PA was due to withdrawal (ie, temporary decrease in a "U-shaped" curve) or offset (ie, return to baseline) effect. METHODS: Our main inclusion criterion was a prospective within-participant test of change in PA during abstinence conditions among people who smoke cigarettes daily who were not using a cessation medication. Our search of PubMed, PsycINFO, and personal libraries yielded a total of 32 tests with 2054 participants. RESULTS: There was a medium effect size indicating an overall decrease in PA following abstinence from cigarettes (Cohen's d = -0.40, 95% CI = -0.30 to -0.49). There was large heterogeneity (I2 = 70.7%). Most (79%) of the 24 trials that conducted significance tests reported that reduction in PA was significant. Seven tests were adequately designed to detect a withdrawal versus offset effect. Over half (57%) displayed a U-shaped curve for abstinence-induced change in PA indicative of a withdrawal symptom rather than offset effect. CONCLUSIONS: Abstinence from cigarettes is associated with a decrease in PA. Whether low PA should be added to withdrawal measures and diagnostic criteria requires replication of the time-course of change in PA and tests of whether abstinence-induced changes in PA and negative affect occur independently. IMPLICATIONS: Though there was substantial heterogeneity among trials, our findings suggest that (1) abstinence from cigarettes decreases positive affect and (2) this decrease may represent a withdrawal effect (vs. an offset effect). However, it is unclear whether abstinence-induced losses in positive affect are independent from increased negative affect.
INTRODUCTION: Most descriptions of tobacco withdrawal have not changed in >30 years despite new research. This meta-analysis tested whether abstinence leads to decreased positive affect (PA) because abstinence-induced symptom changes are a core feature of the tobaccowithdrawal syndrome. In addition, we examined whether reduced PA was due to withdrawal (ie, temporary decrease in a "U-shaped" curve) or offset (ie, return to baseline) effect. METHODS: Our main inclusion criterion was a prospective within-participant test of change in PA during abstinence conditions among people who smoke cigarettes daily who were not using a cessation medication. Our search of PubMed, PsycINFO, and personal libraries yielded a total of 32 tests with 2054 participants. RESULTS: There was a medium effect size indicating an overall decrease in PA following abstinence from cigarettes (Cohen's d = -0.40, 95% CI = -0.30 to -0.49). There was large heterogeneity (I2 = 70.7%). Most (79%) of the 24 trials that conducted significance tests reported that reduction in PA was significant. Seven tests were adequately designed to detect a withdrawal versus offset effect. Over half (57%) displayed a U-shaped curve for abstinence-induced change in PA indicative of a withdrawal symptom rather than offset effect. CONCLUSIONS: Abstinence from cigarettes is associated with a decrease in PA. Whether low PA should be added to withdrawal measures and diagnostic criteria requires replication of the time-course of change in PA and tests of whether abstinence-induced changes in PA and negative affect occur independently. IMPLICATIONS: Though there was substantial heterogeneity among trials, our findings suggest that (1) abstinence from cigarettes decreases positive affect and (2) this decrease may represent a withdrawal effect (vs. an offset effect). However, it is unclear whether abstinence-induced losses in positive affect are independent from increased negative affect.
Authors: Adam M Leventhal; Andrew J Waters; Eric T Moolchan; Stephen J Heishman; Wallace B Pickworth Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2010-08-10 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Danielle E McCarthy; Thomas M Piasecki; Daniel L Lawrence; Douglas E Jorenby; Saul Shiffman; Timothy B Baker Journal: Addiction Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Laura MacPherson; Matthew T Tull; Alexis K Matusiewicz; Samantha Rodman; David R Strong; Christopher W Kahler; Derek R Hopko; Michael J Zvolensky; Richard A Brown; C W Lejuez Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2010-02
Authors: David G Gilbert; Norka E Rabinovich; Elizabeth A Gilbert-Matuskowitz; Keith P Klein; Michele L Pergadia Journal: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2019-03-28 Impact factor: 3.492
Authors: Andrew M Busch; Erin M Tooley; Shira Dunsiger; Elizabeth A Chattillion; John Fani Srour; Sherry L Pagoto; Christopher W Kahler; Belinda Borrelli Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2017-04-17 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Bettina B Hoepper; Kaitlyn R Siegel; Hannah A Carlon; Christopher W Kahler; Elyse R Park; Steven Trevor Taylor; Hazel V Simpson; Susanne S Hoeppner Journal: JMIR Form Res Date: 2022-07-28
Authors: Madalyn M Liautaud; Afton Kechter; Mariel S Bello; Casey R Guillot; Jason A Oliver; Devin E Banks; Lina M D'Orazio; Adam M Leventhal Journal: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2021-06-10 Impact factor: 3.492