Zhengjie Shen1,2,3,4, Haibo Cheng1,4, Weixing Shen1,4, Lihuiping Tao1,4, Yun Zeng1,3,5, Mianhua Wu1,3, Dongdong Sun4,6, Department Of Otolaryngology Gu Wenzhe. 1. First Clinical Medical College, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210046, China. 2. Department of Medical Oncology, Zhangjiagang First People's Hospital, Zhangjiagang 215600, China. 3. Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Traditional Chinese Medicine Prevention and Treatment of Tumor, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210046, China. 4. Translational Medicine Research Center, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210046, China. 5. Department of Medical Oncology, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing 210000, China. 6. Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210046, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of Aidi injection plus transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with primary hepatic carcinoma. METHODS: A comprehensive research of seven electronic databases was performed for comparative studies evaluating Aidi injection combined with TACE for primary hepatic carcinoma until September 2016. Two authors independently extracted data and assessed the methodological quality of the included trials using the Cochrane risk of bias tool from the Cochrane Handbook version 5.1.0. Data was synthesized by using RevMan 5.3 software. RESULTS: Forty-nine studies involving 3435 patients met the inclusion criteria, most of which were low methodological quality. Compared with TACE alone, Aidi injection plus TACE can significantly improve the efficiency rate [RR = 1.33, 95%CI (1.24, 1.43), P < 0.000 01], clinical beneficial rate [RR = 1.25, 95% CI (1.17, 1.33), P < 0.000 01], survival rate [6 months, RR = 1.19, 95% CI (1.09, 1.29), P < 0.0001], 12 months, [RR = 1.37, 95% CI (1.24, 1.52), P < 0.000 01], 18 months, [RR = 2.00, 95% CI (1.26, 3.20), P < 0.004], 24 months, [RR = 1.44, 95% CI (1.22, 1.70), P < 0.0001], 36 months, [RR = 1.50, 95% CI (1.07, 2.11), P = 0.02 < 0.05], quality of life [RR = 1.84, 95% CI (1.64, 2.05), P < 0.000 01] and immune function [CD3+, MD = 11.12, 95% CI (7.93, 14.30), P < 0.000 01], CD4+, [MD = 10.37, 95% CI (7.29, 13.45), P < 0.000 01], CD4+/CD8+, [MD = 0.30, 95% CI (0.07, 0.53), P = 0.01 < 0.05], NK, [MD = 7.49, 95% CI (6.64, 8.34), P < 0.000 01]. A significant improvement was also found in improvement of symptoms [RR = 1.64, 95%CI (1.38, 1.94), P < 0.000 01], leukopenia [RR = 0.60, 95% CI (0.54, 0.66), P < 0.000 01], thrombocytopenia [RR = 0.46, 95% CI (0.34, 0.61), P < 0.000 01], nausea and vomiting incidence [RR = 0.66, 95% CI (0.54, 0.81), P < 0.0001), liver damage rate [RR = 0.57, 95% CI (0.42, 0.77), P = 0.0003 < 0.05), and kidney damage rate [RR = 0.18, 95% CI (0.05, 0.68), P = 0.01 < 0.05]. CONCLUSION: The results suggested that Aidi injection plus TACE significantly improve the clinical effect of TACE, and reduce the incidence of adverse events. However, rigorous multicenter trials with larger size are warranted to further confirm the findings.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of Aidi injection plus transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with primary hepatic carcinoma. METHODS: A comprehensive research of seven electronic databases was performed for comparative studies evaluating Aidi injection combined with TACE for primary hepatic carcinoma until September 2016. Two authors independently extracted data and assessed the methodological quality of the included trials using the Cochrane risk of bias tool from the Cochrane Handbook version 5.1.0. Data was synthesized by using RevMan 5.3 software. RESULTS: Forty-nine studies involving 3435 patients met the inclusion criteria, most of which were low methodological quality. Compared with TACE alone, Aidi injection plus TACE can significantly improve the efficiency rate [RR = 1.33, 95%CI (1.24, 1.43), P < 0.000 01], clinical beneficial rate [RR = 1.25, 95% CI (1.17, 1.33), P < 0.000 01], survival rate [6 months, RR = 1.19, 95% CI (1.09, 1.29), P < 0.0001], 12 months, [RR = 1.37, 95% CI (1.24, 1.52), P < 0.000 01], 18 months, [RR = 2.00, 95% CI (1.26, 3.20), P < 0.004], 24 months, [RR = 1.44, 95% CI (1.22, 1.70), P < 0.0001], 36 months, [RR = 1.50, 95% CI (1.07, 2.11), P = 0.02 < 0.05], quality of life [RR = 1.84, 95% CI (1.64, 2.05), P < 0.000 01] and immune function [CD3+, MD = 11.12, 95% CI (7.93, 14.30), P < 0.000 01], CD4+, [MD = 10.37, 95% CI (7.29, 13.45), P < 0.000 01], CD4+/CD8+, [MD = 0.30, 95% CI (0.07, 0.53), P = 0.01 < 0.05], NK, [MD = 7.49, 95% CI (6.64, 8.34), P < 0.000 01]. A significant improvement was also found in improvement of symptoms [RR = 1.64, 95%CI (1.38, 1.94), P < 0.000 01], leukopenia [RR = 0.60, 95% CI (0.54, 0.66), P < 0.000 01], thrombocytopenia [RR = 0.46, 95% CI (0.34, 0.61), P < 0.000 01], nausea and vomiting incidence [RR = 0.66, 95% CI (0.54, 0.81), P < 0.0001), liver damage rate [RR = 0.57, 95% CI (0.42, 0.77), P = 0.0003 < 0.05), and kidney damage rate [RR = 0.18, 95% CI (0.05, 0.68), P = 0.01 < 0.05]. CONCLUSION: The results suggested that Aidi injection plus TACE significantly improve the clinical effect of TACE, and reduce the incidence of adverse events. However, rigorous multicenter trials with larger size are warranted to further confirm the findings.