| Literature DB >> 32188167 |
Miguel Armengot-Carceller1,2,3, Ana Reula3,4, Manuel Mata-Roig4, Jordi Pérez-Panadés5, Lara Milian-Medina4, Carmen Carda-Batalla4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Due to the lack of a gold standard diagnostic test, reference centres with experienced personnel and costly procedures are needed for primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) diagnostics. Diagnostic flowcharts always start with clinical symptoms. Therefore, the aim of this work is to define differential clinical criteria so that only patients clinically compatible with PCD are referred to reference centres.Entities:
Keywords: Standard diagnosis; cilia; clinical presentation; primary ciliary dyskinesia; reference centres
Year: 2020 PMID: 32188167 PMCID: PMC7141270 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9030810
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.241
Demographical and clinical symptom characteristics of the study populations.
| Total | PCD | PCD-Like | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 476 (1) | 89 (0.19) | 387 (0.81) | - | - |
|
| |||||
| Male | 250 (0.53) | 46 (0.52) | 204 (0.53) | 1.04 (0.66–1.65) | 0.861 |
| Female | 226 (0.47) | 43 (0,48) | 183 (0,47) | ||
|
| |||||
| Smoker | 13 (0.03) | 3 (0.03) | 10 (0.03) | 1.31 (0.35–4.87) | 0.692 |
| Non-smoker | 462 (0.97) | 86 (0.97) | 376 (0.97) | ||
|
| |||||
| Older than 2 years old | 73 (0.16) | 2 (0.02) | 71 (0.19) | 10.23 (2.46–42.54) |
|
| Younger than 2 years old | 389 (0.84) | 87 (0.98) | 302 (0.81) | ||
|
| |||||
| Yes | 185 (0.39) | 42 (0.47) | 143 (0.37) | 1.52 (0.96–2.43) | 0.076 |
| No | 291 (0.61) | 47 (0.53) | 244 (0.63) | ||
|
| |||||
| Intermittent | 186 (0.42) | 7 (0.08) | 179 (0.50) | 11.65 (5.24–25.90) |
|
| Perennial | 262 (0.58) | 82 (0.92) | 180 (0.50) | ||
|
| |||||
| Yes | 61 (0.56) | 19 (0.66) | 42 (0.53) | 1.67 (0.69–4.05) |
|
| No | 47 (0.44) | 10 (0.34) | 37 (0.47) | ||
|
| |||||
| Yes | 40 (0.08) | 26 (0.30) | 14 (0.04) | 11.17 (5.53–22.57) |
|
| No | 435 (0.92) | 62 (0.70) | 373 (0.96) | ||
|
| |||||
| Yes | 185 (0.39) | 58 (0.68) | 127 (0.33) | 4.38 (2.65–7.25) |
|
| No | 286 (0.61) | 27 (0.32) | 259 (0.67) | ||
|
| |||||
| Yes | 12 (0.03) | 0 (0) | 12 (0.03) | - | - |
| No | 464 (0.97) | 89 (1) | 375 (0.97) | ||
|
| |||||
| Yes | 130 (0.28) | 22 (0.27) | 108 (0.28) | 0.93 (0.54–1.59) | 0.785 |
| No | 339 (0.72) | 61 (0.73) | 278 (0.72) | ||
|
| |||||
| Yes | 47 (0.10) | 21 (0.28) | 26 (0.07) | 5.27 (2.78–10.01) |
|
| No | 414 (0.90) | 55 (0.72) | 359 (0.93) | ||
|
| |||||
| Yes | 165 (0.35) | 54 (0.68) | 111 (0.29) | 5.37 (3.18–9.06) |
|
| No | 301 (0.65) | 25 (0.32) | 276 (0.71) | ||
|
| |||||
| Yes | 342 (0.72) | 86 (0.97) | 256 (0.66) | 14.56 (4.52–46.92) |
|
| No | 133 (0.28) | 3 (0.03) | 130 (0.34) | ||
|
| |||||
| Yes | 255 (0.54) | 83 (0.93) | 172 (0.45) | 17.21 (7.34–40.37) |
|
| No | 220 (0.46) | 6 (0.07) | 214 (0.55) | ||
|
| |||||
| Yes | 120 (0.25) | 53 (0.62) | 67 (0.17) | 7.65 (4.60–12.71) |
|
| No | 352 (0.75) | 33 (0.38) | 319 (0.83) | ||
|
| |||||
| Yes | 20 (0.18) | 20 (0.95) | 0 (0) | - | - |
| No | 90 (0.82) | 1 (0.05) | 89 (1) | ||
|
| |||||
| Yes | 217 (0.46) | 65 (0.73) | 152 (0.39) | 4.19 (2.51–6.98) |
|
| No | 259 (0.54) | 24 (0.27) | 235 (0.61) | ||
|
| |||||
| Yes | 16 (0.03) | 2 (0.02) | 14 (0.04) | 0.61 (0.14–2.74) | 0.497 |
| No | 460 (0.97) | 87 (0.98) | 373 (0.96) | ||
Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia (PCD), bold format means the statistically significant p-values.
Factors that best predict primary ciliary dyskinesia selected by step-wise logistic regression. Regression coefficient, adjusted odds ratio (by the others variables included), and test p-value are included.
| Regression Coefficient | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 3.835 | 46.29 (12.51–171.33) | <0.001 |
|
| 0.723 | 2.06 (1.02–4.15) | 0.043 |
|
| 2.380 | 10.81 (3.9–29.97) | <0.001 |
|
| 1.394 | 4.03 (1.85–8.76) | <0.001 |
|
| 1.419 | 4.13 (0.98–17.34) | 0.032 |
|
| 2.328 | 10.26 (3.63–29.03) | <0.001 |
|
| 1.253 | 3.5 (1.66–7.38) | <0.001 |
Figure 1Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the best prediction model. Sensitivity 80%, specificity 88%, Area Under the Curve (AUC) 0.92.
Figure 2Classification and regression tree (CART) for the classification of individuals as PCD or PCD-like by using clinical variables as classificatory criteria. Intermittent (I), perennial (P), and not-applicable (NA).