| Literature DB >> 32188033 |
Jingjing Zhang1,2,3, Wenqiang Tan1,2, Qing Li1,2, Fang Dong1,2, Zhanyong Guo1,2,3.
Abstract
Chitosan is an active biopolymer, and the combination of it with other active groups can be a valuable method to improve the potential application of the resultant derivatives in food, cosmetics, packaging materials, and other industries. In this paper, a series of N,N,N-trimethyl-O-(ureidopyridinium)acetyl chitosan derivatives were synthesized. The combination of chitosan with ureidopyridinium group and quaternary ammonium group made it achieve developed water solubility and biological properties. The structures of chitosan and chitosan derivatives were confirmed by FTIR, 1H NMR spectra, and elemental analysis. The prepared chitosan derivatives were evaluated for antioxidant property by 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging ability, hydroxyl radical scavenging ability, and superoxide radical scavenging ability. The results revealed that the synthesized chitosan derivatives exhibited improved antioxidant activity compared with chitosan. The chitosan derivatives were also investigated for antifungal activity against Phomopsis asparagus as well as Botrytis cinerea, and they showed a significant inhibitory effect on the selected phytopathogen. Meanwhile, CCK-8 assay was used to test the cytotoxicity of chitosan derivatives, and the results showed that most derivatives had low toxicity. These data suggested to develop analogs of chitosan derivatives containing ureidopyridinium group and quaternary ammonium group, which will provide a new kind of promising biomaterials having decreased cytotoxicity as well as excellent antioxidant and antimicrobial activity.Entities:
Keywords: antifungal activity; antioxidant activity; chitosan derivatives; quaternary ammonium group; ureidopyridinium group
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32188033 PMCID: PMC7142772 DOI: 10.3390/md18030163
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Scheme 1Synthesis routes for chitosan derivatives.
Figure 1FTIR spectra of chitosan and chitosan derivatives.
Figure 21H NMR spectra of chitosan and chitosan derivatives.
Yields and the degrees of substitution of chitosan derivatives.
| Compounds | Yields (%) | Elemental Analyses (%) | Degrees of Substitution | Deacetylation | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | N | H | C/N | ||||
| CS | 43.42 | 7.98 | 6.30 | 5.44 | 0.83 | ||
| CTCS | 85.9 | 35.90 | 4.50 | 6.27 | 7.98 | 0.60 | |
| a | 72.2 | 43.31 | 7.88 | 5.77 | 5.50 | 0.40 | |
Figure 3DPPH-radical scavenging activity of chitosan and chitosan derivatives.
Figure 4Hydroxyl-radical scavenging activity of chitosan and chitosan derivatives.
Figure 5Superoxide-radical scavenging activity of chitosan and chitosan derivatives.
DPPH-radical scavenging activity of chitosan and chitosan derivatives (0.01 < * p < 0.05, 0.001 < ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. CS at the same concentration).
| Sample | DPPH-Radical Scavenging Rate (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1 mg/mL | 0.2 mg/mL | 0.4 mg/mL | 0.8 mg/mL | 1.6 mg/mL | |
| CS | 2.61 ± 1.53 | 5.07 ± 1.32 | 6.94 ± 0.46 | 7.66 ± 2.87 | 7.92 ± 1.32 |
| CTCS | 6.68 ± 1.23 ** | 11.48 ± 2.34 * | 20.68 ± 2.01 * | 34.69 ± 3.05 *** | 53.09 ± 3.69 ** |
| a | 6.51 ± 0.89 * | 11.89 ± 2.15 * | 21.91 ± 2.25 * | 37.62 ± 2.98 *** | 58.71 ± 1.99 *** |
| b | 9.69 ± 1.21 *** | 18.24 ± 1.25 *** | 32.17 ± 2.36 ** | 80.46 ± 3.67 *** | 79.32 ± 3.54 *** |
| c | 12.35 ± 0.87 ** | 19.35 ± 1.35 *** | 42.35 ± 3.25 ** | 68.73 ± 2.58 *** | 85.14 ± 1.99 *** |
Hydroxyl-radical scavenging activity of chitosan and chitosan derivatives (0.01 < * p < 0.05, 0.001 < ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. CS at the same concentration).
| Sample | Hydroxyl-Radical Scavenging Rate (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1 mg/mL | 0.2 mg/mL | 0.4 mg/mL | 0.8 mg/mL | 1.6 mg/mL | |
| CS | 0 | 0 | 2.01 ± 2.33 | 6.48 ± 1.32 | 21.45 ± 0.54 |
| CTCS | 4.83 ± 0.58 * | 11.65 ± 1.32 * | 20.63 ± 0.42 * | 33.28 ± 1.36 *** | 49.75 ± 1.41 *** |
| a | 20.28 ± 0.49 *** | 33.26 ± 1.33 *** | 44.06 ± 0.46 ** | 57.55 ± 0.87 *** | 66.37 ± 0.32 *** |
| b | 16.81 ± 2.41 * | 36.94 ± 0.54 *** | 53.58 ± 1.53 *** | 62.89 ± 0.78 *** | 69.88 ± 2.33 *** |
| c | 22.46 ± 0.40 *** | 28.79 ± 1.29 ** | 60.90 ± 0.55 ** | 68.39 ± 0.32 *** | 74.21 ± 1.51 *** |
Superoxide-radical scavenging activity of chitosan and chitosan derivatives (0.01 < * p < 0.05, 0.001 < ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. CS at the same concentration).
| Sample | Superoxide-Radical Scavenging Rate (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1 mg/mL | 0.2 mg/mL | 0.4 mg/mL | 0.8 mg/mL | 1.6 mg/mL | |
| CS | 23.31 ± 0.41 | 25.22 ± 0.54 | 28.49 ± 1.64 | 34.17 ± 0.78 | 34.72 ± 1.33 |
| CTCS | 27.01 ± 1.39 | 32.48 ± 3.36 | 39.74 ± 2.96 * | 50.16 ± 1.66 ** | 70.14 ± 0.65 *** |
| a | 44.42 ± 1.41 ** | 54.29 ± 1.36 *** | 60.91 ± 1.98 *** | 76.49 ± 1.59 *** | 82.73 ± 0.70 *** |
| b | 48.05 ± 0.40 * | 57.14 ± 2.54 ** | 64.03 ± 2.62 *** | 78.57 ± 0.78 *** | 90.52 ± 1.33 *** |
| c | 51.69 ± 0.43 ** | 57.79 ± 1.56 *** | 63.51 ± 2.71 *** | 80.52 ± 2.69 *** | 92.61 ± 1.29 *** |
Figure 6The antifungal activity of chitosan and chitosan derivatives against P. asparagus (0.01 < * p < 0.05, 0.001 < ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. CS at the same concentration).
Figure 7The antifungal activity of chitosan and chitosan derivatives against B. cinerea (*** p < 0.001 vs. CS at the same concentration).
Figure 8The cytotoxicity of chitosan and chitosan derivatives on L929 cells (0.01 < * p < 0.05, 0.001 < ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. CS at the same concentration).