Literature DB >> 32187392

Relationship between initiation of 340B participation and hospital safety-net engagement.

Sayeh S Nikpay1, Melinda B Buntin1, Rena M Conti2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The 340B program allows safety-net hospitals to acquire discounted outpatient drugs and charge payers full price. We examined whether 340B participation increases safety-net engagement. DATA SOURCES: 340B participation data, Medicare hospital cost reports, American Hospital Association Survey, and Schedule 990 nonprofit hospital tax returns. STUDY
DESIGN: Quasi-experimental difference-in-differences design comparing 340B hospitals (the "treatment" group) before and after participating to changes over time to three alternative "control" groups: all other nonprofit and public hospitals, hospitals that are not participating during our study, and hospitals that were not-yet-participating but started after 2015. Outcome measures include a range of safety-net care measures that are alternatives to the standard uncompensated care: charity care, community benefit spending, charity care policies, and low-profit service-line provision. DATA EXTRACTION: We extracted data on all nonprofit and public hospitals from 2011 to 2015. We linked 340B participation data to Medicare hospital cost reports and American Hospital Association data using Medicare hospital identifiers. 990 Data was linked on name and address. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: New 340B participation was not associated with a change in uncompensated care, but was associated with a 28.9 percent increase in charity care spending (SE = 8.8), or about $880,000 per hospital. However, total community benefit spending (including charity care) did not change. 340B was associated with an increase in the probability of offering discounted care (4.3 percentage points, SE = 1.6) from 84 to 88 percent and an increase in the income eligibility limit for discounted care (18.9 percentage points, SE = 5.6) from 294 to 313 percent. Participation was not associated with the probability of offering low-profit medical care services.
CONCLUSIONS: Alternative measures show that newly participating hospitals may increase charity care, potentially through offering more patients discounted care. However, increases appear to be fully offset by reductions in other community benefit programs. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  340B; DSH Hospitals; community benefit spending; safety-net care; service provision

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32187392      PMCID: PMC7080377          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  14 in total

1.  Affordable Care Act Medicaid Expansion Reduced Uninsured Hospital Stays In 2014.

Authors:  Sayeh Nikpay; Thomas Buchmueller; Helen G Levy
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Making profits and providing care: comparing nonprofit, for-profit, and government hospitals.

Authors:  Jill R Horwitz
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Hospital ownership and medical services: market mix, spillover effects, and nonprofit objectives.

Authors:  Jill R Horwitz; Austin Nichols
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  Analysis of hospital community benefit expenditures' alignment with community health needs: evidence from a national investigation of tax-exempt hospitals.

Authors:  Simone R Singh; Gary J Young; Shoou-Yih Daniel Lee; Paula H Song; Jeffrey A Alexander
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Evaluating The Role Of Payment Policy In Driving Vertical Integration In The Oncology Market.

Authors:  Abby Alpert; Helen Hsi; Mireille Jacobson
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  Pricing in the Market for Anticancer Drugs.

Authors:  David H Howard; Peter B Bach; Ernst R Berndt; Rena M Conti
Journal:  J Econ Perspect       Date:  2015

7.  Diversity of Participants in the 340B Drug Pricing Program for US Hospitals.

Authors:  Sayeh Nikpay; Melinda Buntin; Rena M Conti
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 21.873

8.  Consequences of the 340B Drug Pricing Program.

Authors:  Sunita Desai; J Michael McWilliams
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Using propensity scores in difference-in-differences models to estimate the effects of a policy change.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Stuart; Haiden A Huskamp; Kenneth Duckworth; Jeffrey Simmons; Zirui Song; Michael Chernew; Colleen L Barry
Journal:  Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol       Date:  2014-12-01

10.  The 340B drug discount program: hospitals generate profits by expanding to reach more affluent communities.

Authors:  Rena M Conti; Peter B Bach
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 6.301

View more
  1 in total

1.  340B Drug Pricing Program and hospital provision of uncompensated care.

Authors:  Sunita M Desai; J Michael McWilliams
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 3.247

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.