Literature DB >> 32187374

Computational identification of cell-specific variable regions in ChIP-seq data.

Tommaso Andreani1,2, Steffen Albrecht1, Jean-Fred Fontaine1, Miguel A Andrade-Navarro1.   

Abstract

Chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-seq) is used to identify genome-wide DNA regions bound by proteins. Given one ChIP-seq experiment with replicates, binding sites not observed in all the replicates will usually be interpreted as noise and discarded. However, the recent discovery of high-occupancy target (HOT) regions suggests that there are regions where binding of multiple transcription factors can be identified. To investigate ChIP-seq variability, we developed a reproducibility score and a method that identifies cell-specific variable regions in ChIP-seq data by integrating replicated ChIP-seq experiments for multiple protein targets on a particular cell type. Using our method, we found variable regions in human cell lines K562, GM12878, HepG2, MCF-7 and in mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs). These variable-occupancy target regions (VOTs) are CG dinucleotide rich, and show enrichment at promoters and R-loops. They overlap significantly with HOT regions, but are not blacklisted regions producing non-specific binding ChIP-seq peaks. Furthermore, in mESCs, VOTs are conserved among placental species suggesting that they could have a function important for this taxon. Our method can be useful to point to such regions along the genome in a given cell type of interest, to improve the downstream interpretative analysis before follow-up experiments.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32187374      PMCID: PMC7229859          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaa180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  20 in total

1.  DNA-binding factors shape the mouse methylome at distal regulatory regions.

Authors:  Michael B Stadler; Rabih Murr; Lukas Burger; Robert Ivanek; Florian Lienert; Anne Schöler; Erik van Nimwegen; Christiane Wirbelauer; Edward J Oakeley; Dimos Gaidatzis; Vijay K Tiwari; Dirk Schübeler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Highly expressed loci are vulnerable to misleading ChIP localization of multiple unrelated proteins.

Authors:  Leonid Teytelman; Deborah M Thurtle; Jasper Rine; Alexander van Oudenaarden
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Evolutionarily conserved elements in vertebrate, insect, worm, and yeast genomes.

Authors:  Adam Siepel; Gill Bejerano; Jakob S Pedersen; Angie S Hinrichs; Minmei Hou; Kate Rosenbloom; Hiram Clawson; John Spieth; Ladeana W Hillier; Stephen Richards; George M Weinstock; Richard K Wilson; Richard A Gibbs; W James Kent; Webb Miller; David Haussler
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Genome-wide analysis reveals TET- and TDG-dependent 5-methylcytosine oxidation dynamics.

Authors:  Li Shen; Hao Wu; Dinh Diep; Shinpei Yamaguchi; Ana C D'Alessio; Ho-Lim Fung; Kun Zhang; Yi Zhang
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Dynamic trans-acting factor colocalization in human cells.

Authors:  Dan Xie; Alan P Boyle; Linfeng Wu; Jie Zhai; Trupti Kawli; Michael Snyder
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  The ENCODE Blacklist: Identification of Problematic Regions of the Genome.

Authors:  Haley M Amemiya; Anshul Kundaje; Alan P Boyle
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  HOT or not: examining the basis of high-occupancy target regions.

Authors:  Katarzyna Wreczycka; Vedran Franke; Bora Uyar; Ricardo Wurmus; Selman Bulut; Baris Tursun; Altuna Akalin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Widespread misinterpretable ChIP-seq bias in yeast.

Authors:  Daechan Park; Yaelim Lee; Gurvani Bhupindersingh; Vishwanath R Iyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Comparative analysis of regulatory information and circuits across distant species.

Authors:  Alan P Boyle; Carlos L Araya; Cathleen Brdlik; Philip Cayting; Chao Cheng; Yong Cheng; Kathryn Gardner; LaDeana W Hillier; Judith Janette; Lixia Jiang; Dionna Kasper; Trupti Kawli; Pouya Kheradpour; Anshul Kundaje; Jingyi Jessica Li; Lijia Ma; Wei Niu; E Jay Rehm; Joel Rozowsky; Matthew Slattery; Rebecca Spokony; Robert Terrell; Dionne Vafeados; Daifeng Wang; Peter Weisdepp; Yi-Chieh Wu; Dan Xie; Koon-Kiu Yan; Elise A Feingold; Peter J Good; Michael J Pazin; Haiyan Huang; Peter J Bickel; Steven E Brenner; Valerie Reinke; Robert H Waterston; Mark Gerstein; Kevin P White; Manolis Kellis; Michael Snyder
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Predicting double-strand DNA breaks using epigenome marks or DNA at kilobase resolution.

Authors:  Raphaël Mourad; Krzysztof Ginalski; Gaëlle Legube; Olivier Cuvier
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  1 in total

1.  Single-cell specific and interpretable machine learning models for sparse scChIP-seq data imputation.

Authors:  Steffen Albrecht; Tommaso Andreani; Miguel A Andrade-Navarro; Jean Fred Fontaine
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.752

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.