Literature DB >> 32187032

Long-term Comparison of Robotic and Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-weighted Analysis of 2084 Consecutive Patients.

Ho-Jung Shin1,2, Sang-Yong Son1,3, Bo Wang1, Chul Kyu Roh1,3, Hoon Hur1,3, Sang-Uk Han1,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare long-term outcomes between robotic and LG approaches using propensity score weighting based on a generalized boosted method to control for selection bias. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Minimally invasive surgical approaches for GC are increasing, yet limited evidence exists for long-term outcomes of robotic gastrectomy (RG).
METHODS: Patients (n = 2084) with GC stages I-III who underwent LG or RG between 2009 and 2017 were analyzed. Generalized boosted method was used to estimate a propensity score derived from all available preoperative characteristics. Long-term outcomes were compared using the adjusted Kaplan-Meier method and the weighted Cox proportional hazards regression model.
RESULTS: After propensity score weighting, the population was balanced. Patients who underwent RG showed reduced blood loss (16 mL less, P = 0.025), sufficient lymph node harvest from the initial period, and no changes in surgical outcomes over time. With 52-month median follow-up, no difference was noted in 5-year overall survival in unweighted [91.5% in LG vs 94% in RG; hazard ratio (HR), 0.71; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.46-1.1; P = 0.126] and weighted populations (94.2% in LG vs 93.2% in RG; HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.52-1.48; P = 0.636). There were no differences in 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS), with unweighted 5-year RFS of 95.4% for LG and 95.2% for RG (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.55-1.64; P = 0.845) and weighted 5-year RFS of 96.3% for LG and 95.3% for RG (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.66-2.33; P = 0.498).
CONCLUSIONS: After balancing covariates, RG demonstrated reliable surgical outcomes from the beginning. Long-term survival after RG and LG for GC was similar.
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 32187032     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  8 in total

1.  Robotic spleen-preserving total gastrectomy shows better short-term advantages: a comparative study with laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Zu-Kai Wang; Jian-Xian Lin; Fu-Hai Wang; Jian-Wei Xie; Jia-Bin Wang; Jun Lu; Qi-Yue Chen; Long-Long Cao; Mi Lin; Ru-Hong Tu; Ze-Ning Huang; Ju-Li Lin; Hua-Long Zheng; Ping Li; Chao-Hui Zheng; Chang-Ming Huang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Morbidity and Mortality of Laparoscopic vs Open Total Gastrectomy for Clinical Stage I Gastric Cancer: The CLASS02 Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Fenglin Liu; Changming Huang; Zekuan Xu; Xiangqian Su; Gang Zhao; Jianxin Ye; Xiaohui Du; Hua Huang; Jiankun Hu; Guoxin Li; Peiwu Yu; Yong Li; Jian Suo; Naiqing Zhao; Wei Zhang; Haojie Li; Hongyong He; Yihong Sun
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 31.777

3.  The Advantages of Robotic Gastrectomy over Laparoscopic Surgery for Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Matsunaga; Wataru Miyauchi; Yusuke Kono; Yuji Shishido; Kozo Miyatani; Takehiko Hanaki; Joji Watanabe; Kyoichi Kihara; Manabu Yamamoto; Yoji Fukumoto; Naruo Tokuyasu; Shuichi Takano; Teruhisa Sakamoto; Soichiro Honjo; Hiroaki Saito; Yoshiyuki Fujiwara
Journal:  Yonago Acta Med       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 1.641

Review 4.  Progress of Gastric Cancer Surgery in the era of Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Yumin Wang; Luyuan Zhang; Yi Yang; Shan Lu; Hao Chen
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 6.580

5.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy for early-stage gastric cancer: Case series of initial experience.

Authors:  Fabio Ambrosini; Valerio Caracino; Diletta Frazzini; Pietro Coletta; Edoardo Liberatore; Massimo Basti
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2020-12-24

6.  Risk Factors for the Severity of Complications in Minimally Invasive Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: a Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Chul Kyu Roh; Soomin Lee; Sang-Yong Son; Hoon Hur; Sang-Uk Han
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 3.720

7.  Robot-assisted tumorectomy for an unusual pelvic retroperitoneal leiomyoma: A case report.

Authors:  Zhe Zhang; Feiyu Shi; Junjun She
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 8.  Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Mega Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Shantanu Baral; Mubeen Hussein Arawker; Qiannan Sun; Mingrui Jiang; Liuhua Wang; Yong Wang; Muhammad Ali; Daorong Wang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-06-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.