Courtney A DelPo1, Bryan Kudisch1, Kyu Hyung Park1, Saeed-Uz-Zaman Khan2, Francesca Fassioli1,3, Daniele Fausti1,4,5, Barry P Rand2,6, Gregory D Scholes1. 1. Department of Chemistry, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, United States. 2. Department of Electrical Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, United States. 3. SISSA- Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati, Trieste 34136, Italy. 4. Department of Physics, University of Trieste, Via A. Valerio 2, 34127 Trieste, Italy. 5. Elettra-Sincrotrone Trieste S.C.p.A., Strada Statale 14 - km 163.5 in AREA Science Park, 34149 Basovizza, Trieste, Italy. 6. Andlinger Center for Energy and the Environment, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, United States.
Abstract
Strong light-matter coupling is emerging as a fascinating way to tune optical properties and modify the photophysics of molecular systems. In this work, we studied a molecular chromophore under strong coupling with the optical mode of a Fabry-Perot cavity resonant to the first electronic absorption band. Using femtosecond pump-probe spectroscopy, we investigated the transient response of the cavity-coupled molecules upon photoexcitation resonant to the upper and lower polaritons. We identified an excited state absorption from upper and lower polaritons to a state at the energy of the second cavity mode. Quantum mechanical calculations of the many-molecule energy structure of cavity polaritons suggest assignment of this state as a two-particle polaritonic state with optically allowed transitions from the upper and lower polaritons. We provide new physical insight into the role of two-particle polaritonic states in explaining transient signatures in hybrid light-matter coupling systems consistent with analogous many-body systems.
Strong light-matter coupling is emerging as a fascinating way to tune optical properties and modify the photophysics of molecular systems. In this work, we studied a molecular chromophore under strong coupling with the optical mode of a Fabry-Perot cavity resonant to the first electronic absorption band. Using femtosecond pump-probe spectroscopy, we investigated the transient response of the cavity-coupled molecules upon photoexcitation resonant to the upper and lower polaritons. We identified an excited state absorption from upper and lower polaritons to a state at the energy of the second cavity mode. Quantum mechanical calculations of the many-molecule energy structure of cavity polaritons suggest assignment of this state as a two-particle polaritonic state with optically allowed transitions from the upper and lower polaritons. We provide new physical insight into the role of two-particle polaritonic states in explaining transient signatures in hybrid light-matter coupling systems consistent with analogous many-body systems.
The field of light–matter
coupling has evolved to include various degrees of coupling ranging
from weak to ultrastrong; various types of coupling, including electronic,
vibrational, and vibronic; and various media through which the coupling
occurs, including solid semiconductor architectures and liquid flow
cells.[1] Accompanying this large range are
exciting applications, including room-temperature polariton lasing
and Bose–Einstein condensation,[2,3] modification
of ground-state and chemical reactivity,[4,5] mediated and
enhanced rate of energy transfer,[6,7] and adjustment
of work-function.[8] These applications are
possible due to the formation of hybrid light–matter polaritonic
states that change the energetic landscape of the coupled material.Realizing additional applications as well as improving current
applications requires a fundamental understanding of the properties
of polaritonic states. When an electronic or vibrational transition
is resonant with the cavity mode in a Fabry–Perot cavity, the
energy level of the transition is split into an upper polariton and
a lower polariton. The energy splitting between the two polaritons
is called the Rabi splitting, ΩR, and its magnitude is approximately:[1]where g is the strength
of
the coupling between the molecules and the cavity, μ is the
magnitude of the transition dipole moment of the material, N is the number of molecules coupled to the cavity, ω
is the frequency of the transition, ε0 is the vacuum
permittivity constant, and v is the cavity mode volume.If there are N molecules coupled to the cavity
mode, then a ladder of states that comprises a superposition of molecular
excitations and cavity photons is generated. The eigenvalues of these
states are grouped into “rungs” of an energy ladder,
where each rung comprises an upper polariton (UP) and a lower polariton
(LP) state with a high density of intervening dark states (DS). Transitions
from the ground state to these dark states are forbidden.[9]As hybrid light–matter states, polaritons
adopt both photonic
and molecular characteristics. While there are well-established methods
for characterizing the dispersive steady-state features of polaritons,
there remains ambiguity in assigning the excited state transitions
in a cavity system. Within the vibrational strong coupling regime,
the presence of overtones of the dark states complicates excited state
absorption assignments. For example, the positive absorptive feature
close to the lower polariton energy observed in transient absorption
spectroscopy has been discussed as an excited state absorption to
the second vibrational overtone from either the upper polariton or
the dark states.[10−12] In the electronic strong coupling regime, electronic
overtones of the molecular states generally do not obfuscate assignments;
however, available reports feature overlapping molecular and polaritonic
features with similar spectral shapes that can make distinct assignments
difficult.[13,14] This blurring of spectral features
occurs as a result of the small Rabi splitting but can be overcome
by using materials with high energy electronic transitions and strong
oscillator strengths that make the ultrastrong coupling regime feasible.
The transition dipole moment term in eq is scaled by the transition energy leading to larger
Rabi splitting for molecules with high energy transitions.[15] Thus, with a stronger coupled cavity, we can
avoid the blurring of polaritonic and molecular features.In
this study, we use the organic light emitting diode (OLED) material
1,2,3,5-tetrakis(carbazol-9-yl)-4,6-dicyanobenzene (4CzIPN) to achieve
ultrastrong electronic coupling, allowing us to distinctly separate
and observe the excited state features of a cavity system. Using pump–probe
spectroscopy, we propose a new interpretation of the spectral features
in a cavity system and use this framework to investigate polaritonic
dynamics (Figure ).
Figure 1
Fabry–Perot
cavity description. (a) Pump–probe spectroscopy
reveals excited state features attributed to the UP, LP, and DS. (b)
Cavity architecture is shown next to the 4CzIPN structure.
Fabry–Perot
cavity description. (a) Pump–probe spectroscopy
reveals excited state features attributed to the UP, LP, and DS. (b)
Cavity architecture is shown next to the 4CzIPN structure.The allowed absorption transitions of 4CzIPN have significant
charge-transfer
character, so the maximum peaks of absorption and fluorescence are
concentration dependent and sensitive to the polarity of the surrounding
medium (SI Figure 1).[16−18] In bathocuproine
(BCP), 4CzIPN has a lowest energy absorption maximum around 385 nm
and a fluorescence maximum at 570 nm. As a vacuum-evaporated film,
BCP has a maximum absorption peak at 281 nm and a fluorescence peak
at 384 nm.[19] We embedded 4CzIPN in a BCP
host such that the 4CzIPN lowest energy singlet transition, highlighted
in blue in Figure , is apparent as a shoulder at 460 nm.
Figure 2
Steady-state measurements
of the bare film and cavity system. (a)
Absorption and fluorescence (ex. 380 nm) of a bare film of 4CzIPN
in BCP with the singlet transition at 460 nm highlighted in blue.
Angle-dependent reflectance (b) and photoluminescence (ex. 406 nm)
(c) measurements of the 4CzIPN cavity system.
Steady-state measurements
of the bare film and cavity system. (a)
Absorption and fluorescence (ex. 380 nm) of a bare film of 4CzIPN
in BCP with the singlet transition at 460 nm highlighted in blue.
Angle-dependent reflectance (b) and photoluminescence (ex. 406 nm)
(c) measurements of the 4CzIPN cavity system.To prepare the cavities, 4CzIPN:BCP (10:1) was thermally evaporated
between two silver layers of thicknesses 30 and 200 nm. The thickness
of the 4CzIPN:BCP layer was tuned with nanometer precision to maximize
Rabi splitting. The magnitude of the Rabi splitting was estimated
using the separation of the maxima of the polaritonic peaks in the
angle-dependent reflection measurements displayed in Figure , yielding a Rabi splitting
of 1.6 eV. We find an upper polariton peak centered around 360 nm
and a lower polariton at 660 nm. At nearly 60% of the energy of the
460 nm transition, the magnitude of this Rabi splitting places the
system in the ultrastrong coupling regime.[20] As the angle-dependent fluorescence spans from 660 nm at 10°
to 550 nm at 90°, the color of the fluorescence changes from
red to green. The Q-factor for this cavity is approximately
15 (SI Figure 2), which is in agreement
with the reported Q-factors for similar optical cavity
systems.[14] The double peaks observed at
angles 40° to 60° are a result of transverse electric (TE)
and transverse magnetic (TM) polarization (SI Figure 3).[21,22]Ultrafast pump–probe
spectroscopy at room temperature reveals
differences in the spectral features of the cavity system as compared
to a bare film of 4CzIPN in BCP. In BCP, 4CzIPN has an excited-state
absorption (ESA) at 485 nm and a ground state bleach (GSB) at 420
nm (Figure a). These
spectral features are attributed to photoinduced charge transfer from
the carbazole donor groups to the dicyanobenzene center in 4CzIPN,
as confirmed by spectroelectrochemistry measurements (SI Figure 4). The bare film spectrum is consistent
with pump–probe measurements performed on 4CzIPN in solution.[23] The kinetic trace of the ESA shows a multiexponential
decay with three time constants outlined in Table . To the best of our knowledge, the ultrafast
dynamics of this molecule have not been previously reported, but the
final time constant is in agreement with the reported time constant
of prompt fluorescence.[24]
Figure 3
Pump–probe spectroscopy
of the bare film and angled cavity.
(a) Bare film (no cavity) transient absorption spectrum pumped at
370 nm. Transient reflection spectra pumping the UP (b, d) and LP
(c, e) at 10° (b,c) and 35° (d, e). The angle is relative
to normal incidence of the probe. The UP and LP were pumped at 370
and 650 nm at 10° and at 360 and 635 nm at 35°, respectively.
Pump power for the bare film, the UP at 10°, the LP at 10°,
the UP at 35°, and the LP at 35° was 60, 10, 20, 20, and
25 μW, respectively. All experiments were conducted within a
linear power regime (SI Figure 5). Kinetic
traces are displayed in red and black with the corresponding wavelength
indicated on the spectrum. Insets in c and e enhance the UP energy
feature at 1 ns when pumping the LP. Note that white light generation
below 330 nm was not efficient enough to reveal the entire feature
in the inset of e, but it is predicted to be a derivative-like feature
as that observed in the inset of c.
Table 1
Time Constants for the Excited State
Spectral Features of the Bare Filma
τ1
τ2
τ3
bare
film
19 ps
530 ps
14 ns
Time constants for the excited
state spectral features of the cavity were fit using these constants
(SI Figure 9 and SI Figure 10).
Pump–probe spectroscopy
of the bare film and angled cavity.
(a) Bare film (no cavity) transient absorption spectrum pumped at
370 nm. Transient reflection spectra pumping the UP (b, d) and LP
(c, e) at 10° (b,c) and 35° (d, e). The angle is relative
to normal incidence of the probe. The UP and LP were pumped at 370
and 650 nm at 10° and at 360 and 635 nm at 35°, respectively.
Pump power for the bare film, the UP at 10°, the LP at 10°,
the UP at 35°, and the LP at 35° was 60, 10, 20, 20, and
25 μW, respectively. All experiments were conducted within a
linear power regime (SI Figure 5). Kinetic
traces are displayed in red and black with the corresponding wavelength
indicated on the spectrum. Insets in c and e enhance the UP energy
feature at 1 ns when pumping the LP. Note that white light generation
below 330 nm was not efficient enough to reveal the entire feature
in the inset of e, but it is predicted to be a derivative-like feature
as that observed in the inset of c.Time constants for the excited
state spectral features of the cavity were fit using these constants
(SI Figure 9 and SI Figure 10).The 4CzIPN
spectral features are notably absent in the cavity spectra
(Figure b, c). Upon
resonant photoexcitation of the UP, we observe a derivative-like shape
at 360 nm and a positive Lorentzian shaped response at 660 nm. Due
to the common ground state for UP and LP transitions, we expect a
GSB response at the lower polariton energy. Note that in Figure , the linear response
is subtracted from the transient measurement, and therefore, the GSB
is expected to appear as a negative feature in the transient spectra.
Instead, we observe a sharp ESA at 660 nm, appearing as mentioned
above as a positive Lorentzian-shaped feature. In contrast, upon resonant
excitation of the LP (Figure c), we observe a strong ESA at 360 nm and a smaller ESA at
660 nm.Within the electronic strong coupling regime, many studies
have
focused on probing the excited state dynamics of J-aggregate systems.
Derivative shaped transient spectra are observed for the J-aggregate
system both inside and outside of the cavity, making it difficult
to distinguish molecular and polaritonic features.[13,25−27] In the vibrational strong coupling regime, a transient
response featuring a derivative-like shape at a higher energy and
an ESA at a lower energy has also been reported.[10,11,28]Rotating the incident angle in a polaritonic
system results in
changes of the relative contribution of photonic and molecular character
in each of the polariton bands.[1,9] As a result of these
contributions, angle-dependent pump–probe spectroscopy can
reveal differences in the relative intensities of the spectral features
at various angles. At larger angle (35°, Figure d), we confirm a derivative-like feature
at 350 nm and a sharp ESA at 635 nm when pumping the UP. Upon excitation
of the LP (Figure e), there is an ESA at 350 nm and an ESA at 635 nm.Differences
in the relative intensities of the spectral features
are observed at a larger angle. When pumping the UP at 35°, the
ratio of the intensities of the features at 350 and 635 nm is 0.83:1
which is closer to unity than the 0.5:1 ratio of the intensities of
the 360 and 660 nm features when pumping the UP at 10°. In contrast,
when pumping the LP at 35°, the difference in the ratio of the
intensities of the two spectral features is more drastic at 1:0.33
compared to the 1:0.5 ratio observed when pumping the LP at 10°.Importantly, while the intensities and position of the spectral
features change with the angle, the transient population kinetics
remain the same. When pumping the UP, the 660 nm ESA at 10° and
635 nm ESA at 35° decay very similarly to the 4CzIPN 485 nm ESA
outside the cavity. Comparing the black traces in Figure a, b, and d highlights this
similarity. The 360 nm feature at 10° and 350 nm feature at 35°
show an initial sharp decay with a time constant of approximately
1 ps. After the first few ps, they further decay with the same dynamics
as each corresponding longer wavelength ESA (as shown by the overlap
between the red and black traces at long times in Figure b and d). Upon excitation of
the LP, the 360 nm ESA at 10° and 350 nm ESA at 35° undergo
a fast decay to nearly baseline with a time constant of approximately
1 ps. The signal that remains at these wavelengths following the decay
of each ESA is the same derivative-like feature observed when photoexciting
the UP (see inset in Figure c or SI Figure 8). The 660 nm ESA
at 10° and 635 nm ESA at 35° undergo an initial decay on
the same 1 ps time scale but conversely do not decay to baseline.
Compare the red trace of normalized change in reflectance versus pump–probe
time delay in Figure b to the corresponding black trace in Figure c. When we pump the UP and probe the ESA
at the UP energy, we observe, surprisingly, the same kinetics as when
we pump the LP and probe the ESA at the LP energy. Similarly, we can
compare the red trace in Figure d to the black trace in Figure e. Time constants for each of the traces
obtained from Global Analysis are presented in the Supporting Information(29) (SI Figure 9 and SI Figure 10).We now discuss assignments for the transient spectra
recorded under
the various experimental conditions. A derivative-like feature in
the pump–probe spectra of cavity polaritons, like the one appearing
at the UP energy, has often been rationalized as a contraction of
the Rabi splitting that occurs when a population of the system is
excited by the pump pulse.[28,30] The contraction is
the consequence of the photoinduced reduction of the number of ground
state molecules effectively coupled to the cavity and results in a
red-shift of the transition from the ground state to UP (because the
LP-UP splitting is proportional to the square root of the number of
molecules coupled to the cavity mode). When the spectrum arising from
the red-shifted transition is subtracted from the ground-state spectrum,
a derivative feature is expected in this description (Figure b). In this picture, a derivative-like
feature is also expected at the LP energy as the contraction leads
to a slight blue-shift of the LP absorption.
Figure 4
Spectral feature assignments
for polaritonic states. (a) Ladder
of states predicted using the Tavis–Cummings model including
two-particle states. G, e, and ee designations are
representative of the ground, one, and two-exciton molecular states,
respectively. The number of photons in the cavity is 0, 1, or 2. Contributing
terms to each state are marked with an O, while absent terms are marked
with an X. Optically allowed transitions between the GS and one-particle
states and between one- to two-particle states are indicated by arrows.
Note that transitions from the one-particle dark states at energy
ω to optically bright DUP and DLP states are allowed and indicated
with black dashed arrows. Other two-particle states without predicted
optical transitions are omitted for clarity (see Supporting Information). (b) Excited and ground state contributions
to the transient response. The UP (LP) to 2ω ESA overlaps with
the LP (UP) derivative feature. (c) Comparison of the energy level
schematic for the 2ω state in the polariton framework to the
classic biexciton diagram in semiconductors. In semiconductors, excitons
of opposite spin (+1, −1) can combine to form the biexciton
state. Exciton binding energy, Δ, results from phase-space filling
and causes a slight difference in energy between the biexciton state
and the state at twice the energy of a single exciton (dashed).
Spectral feature assignments
for polaritonic states. (a) Ladder
of states predicted using the Tavis–Cummings model including
two-particle states. G, e, and ee designations are
representative of the ground, one, and two-exciton molecular states,
respectively. The number of photons in the cavity is 0, 1, or 2. Contributing
terms to each state are marked with an O, while absent terms are marked
with an X. Optically allowed transitions between the GS and one-particle
states and between one- to two-particle states are indicated by arrows.
Note that transitions from the one-particle dark states at energy
ω to optically bright DUP and DLP states are allowed and indicated
with black dashed arrows. Other two-particle states without predicted
optical transitions are omitted for clarity (see Supporting Information). (b) Excited and ground state contributions
to the transient response. The UP (LP) to 2ω ESA overlaps with
the LP (UP) derivative feature. (c) Comparison of the energy level
schematic for the 2ω state in the polariton framework to the
classic biexciton diagram in semiconductors. In semiconductors, excitons
of opposite spin (+1, −1) can combine to form the biexciton
state. Exciton binding energy, Δ, results from phase-space filling
and causes a slight difference in energy between the biexciton state
and the state at twice the energy of a single exciton (dashed).While there is nothing wrong with this as a phenomenological
description
of the transient spectra, we propose that the derivative-like shape
in electronic strong coupling should be better regarded as phase-space
filling—that is, the transition frequency of one-particle states
to two-particle states of many body systems tends to be shifted compared
to that of ground state to one-particle states because of differences
in the one-particle versus two-particle wave functions.[31,32] In this picture, the derivative-like feature is the result of the
quantum mechanical energy structure predicted by the simplest Hamiltonian
that treats strong light–matter coupling with many molecules,
namely the Tavis–Cummings Hamiltonian[33,34] (Supporting Information).The Tavis–Cummings
Hamiltonian (TCH) is given bywhere σ+(−) are the rising (lowering) operators
of the ith two level system, ω is the frequency
of the bosonic
optical mode, and a⧧ (a) describe the creation (annihilation) operators of the bosonic field
and g measures the strength of the interaction. Since the Hamiltonian
in eq conserves the
total number of particles N = ∑σ+σ– + a⧧a (either molecular or photonic excitations),
i.e., [H,N ] = 0, its eigenstates are
a superposition of states with the same number of particles. We assume
the case of resonance (ω = E) and focus on
the solution of the eigenstates for the N = 1 and N = 2 particle cases. The collective matter–photon states
are labeled as {|G,n⟩, |e,n⟩
and |ee,n⟩ (I≠ j)}. G, e, and ee label the molecular states and represent all molecules in
the ground state, only a single molecule i excited
and two molecules i and j excited,
respectively. The n instead labels the number of
photons on each state. The results are summarized in Figure a.As depicted in Figure a, the TCH predicts
optically allowed transitions from the
LP and UP one-particle states to three different two-particle polaritons,
which we label as 2LP, 2ω and 2UP. While the energy of the 2ω
state is fixed at twice the cavity resonance frequency, the energy
of 2LP and 2UP depend on the number of molecules coupled to the cavity
(see Supporting Information). The ESA from
UP (LP) to the 2UP (2LP) states is predicted at an energy that is
lower (higher) than the UP (LP) GSB, leading to a derivative-like
feature in the transient spectra, analogous to the contraction of
the Rabi splitting. We note, however, that the expected derivative-like
feature at the LP energy when pumping the LP is absent. This may be
due to the ESA dominating at the LP energy which arises from the UP
to 2ω transition. The TCH also predicts allowed transitions
from the dark states to the upper (DUP) and lower (DLP) polaritons
in the two-particle manifold which we will discuss with the kinetics
of the UP to DS transition.We now turn to the ESA at 660 nm
(the LP energy) when pumping the
UP. The vibrational strong coupling literature reported a similar
ESA feature appearing at the LP energy, which was assigned to a transition
from the dark states to the first vibrational overtone.[11,28] The TCH model we employ does not necessarily involve an overtone
of the molecular transition. We instead attribute this sharp ESA to
the transition from the UP to the two-particle polaritonic state at
2ω (Figure a).
By the nature of the symmetry of the Rabi splitting in a resonant
cavity, the energy of the transition from the UP (LP) to the second
mode of the cavity (2ω) is equal to the energy of the LP (UP)
(Figure a). The derivative-like
features expected to appear at both the UP and LP energies become
obscure when the transition from UP or LP to 2ω overlaps.The existence of the 2ω state and the possibility for transitions
to this state can be understood in analogy to a semiconductor spectroscopic
framework. Semiconductors are well-known to have ladders of excitonic
states: excitons, biexcitons, triexcitons, etc.[35−37] The transient
excited state absorptions in this work are similar to transitions
within the exciton-to-biexciton fine structure states (Figure c, bottom diagram).[32] Essentially, each two-particle state comprises
two one-particle states. In nonlinear spectroscopy, we can sequentially
add these two one-particle states in either order to produce a two-particle
state. In the polaritonic framework, these two-particle states at
2ω correspond to a quantum superposition of the states with
two photons and no molecular excitations and two molecular excitations
with no photons (Figure c, top diagram, see details in the Supporting Information).The relative intensities of the spectral
features are indicative
of polariton character. Comparing the spectra for pumping the LP in
the cavity angled at 35° (Figure e) to the cavity angled at 10° (Figure c) reveals a higher intensity
of the LP to 2ω transition, as indicated by the increased signal
intensity of the 360 and 350 nm features relative to the signal intensity
of the 660 and 635 nm features at early times. Similarly, the spectra
when pumping the UP with the cavity angled at 35° reveals a stronger
intensity LP to 2ω transition as compared to the cavity angled
at 10°. The detuning-dependent intensity of the spectral features
has been reported.[28] We speculate the change
in photonic character of the lower polariton with increasing angle
increases the strength of the transition to 2ω, as has previously
been proposed.[30]When the sample
is angled at 35° (Figure d, e), the spectral shapes remain consistent
with the explanation provided. The states at ω and 2ω
change by the same amount of energy as the UP and LP, leading to the
same spectral assignments at the new angle. The change in relative
energy levels is reflected in the new position of the spectral features
at 360 and 635 nm corresponding to the energies of the UP and LP at
this angle, respectively. The spectral feature assignments are also
supported in detuned cavities and off-resonant excitation (SI Figure 6 and SI Figure 7).According to our spectral assignments, it appears
that both UP
and LP are photoexcited at early times, despite the fact that our
pump pulse is only resonant with one of their transitions. When we
pump only the LP, both LP and UP spectral features initially decay
with a time constant of 1 ps. The 360 nm ESA corresponding to the
transition from the LP to 2ω decays completely on this time
scale, leaving a very small UP derivative-like signal (see inset in Figure c or SI Figure 8). The 1 ps time constant is assigned
to the lifetime of the LP. This same initial time constant is observed
in the 360 nm feature when pumping the UP because the LP ESA overlaps
the UP derivative-like signal at 360 nm. This indicates that when
pumping the UP, there is population of the LP before 1 ps. When pumping
the LP, the 660 nm ESA survives beyond the lifetime of the LP. Within
our proposed scheme, the energy of this signal corresponds to an excited
state transition from the UP to 2ω. This is further supported
by comparing the kinetic trace of the 360 nm feature when pumping
the UP to the 660 nm ESA when pumping the LP. These kinetic traces
are the same because they both contain contributions from the UP and
LP.In the vibrational strong coupling regime, the energy difference
between the LP and the dark state reservoir is small enough to allow
thermal population of the dark states by the LP. In the case of the
system studied in our work, the energy difference between the LP and
the dark states is on the order of 800 meV, which prevents this same
thermal population. We propose two-photon absorption to the UP when
pumping the LP to account for the spectral similarities when pumping
the UP and the LP. The GS to UP transition energy (3.44 eV) is roughly
twice that of the GS to LP (1.87 eV) transition in this particular
cavity. Absorption of two photons of LP energy when pumping the LP
can lead to two-photon absorption to the UP state, thus populating
the UP. While we were operating at low powers where the power dependence
appears to be in the linear regime, we tested the power dependence
to higher powers where a superlinear dependence becomes evident and
is indicative of two-photon absorption (SI Figure 5). While not negligible, two-photon absorption is not strong
at lower powers, which can explain the small intensity of the UP spectral
features when pumping the LP as compared to the signal intensity when
directly pumping the UP.The UP likely populates the dark states
on the time scale of tens
of picoseconds. Comparing the kinetic trace for the bare film ESA
at 485 nm in Figure a to the trace for the cavity ESA at 660 nm in Figure b reveals slight differences between the
two traces up to 100 ps. For clarity, these traces have been reproduced
on the same plot in SI Figure 11. We also
note that the kinetic traces are identical in the nanosecond time
scale, which likely reflect dark state population in accordance with
other similar investigations.[10,11,28] It appears that the cavity kinetic trace has a faster decaying component
on the tens of picoseconds time scale that is not present in the bare
film trace. However, fitting with multiexponential functions yields
similar time constants for both traces, which makes it difficult to
characterize the exact time constant for the UP to DS transition.
Additionally, the predicted ESA’s from the dark states at ω
to the DUP and DLP overlap spectrally with the energies of the UP
and LP, respectively. As a result of this overlap, the dark state
spectrum, expected to be present in the nanosecond time scale (as
a result of the similarity of the darks state decay to the bare molecule
decay),[10,11,28] can appear
spectrally similar to the polaritonic spectrum in the earlier time
regime when pumping either the UP or the LP. The spectral similarity
increases the difficulty of assigning the time scale on which the
UP populates the dark states. Due to the common ground state when
pumping either the UP or LP, an overlapping bleach feature also adds
complexity in disentangling the kinetics.Although extracting
the lifetime of the UP from the entangled kinetics
may be difficult, we anticipate the UP lifetime to be greater than
the 1 ps LP lifetime.[10,11,28,38] As mentioned earlier, the transient features
we observe in the 4CzIPN cavity system are very similar to those reported
in the vibrational strong coupling regime. Within the vibrational
strong coupling regime, the lifetime of the UP has been reported to
range from 10 to 30 ps, which is longer than the corresponding LP
lifetime of 5 ps.[10] Within the electronic
strong coupling regime, the UP and LP lifetimes are much shorter—on
the order of hundreds of femtoseconds. According to the model by Agranovich
et al, the UP lifetime is determined by an intricate interplay of
the UP–DS energy gap and the energy broadening of the DS.[27] The coupling in our electronic strong coupling
system reaches the ultrastrong regime with an UP–DS energy
difference that is four times as large as the reported J-aggregate
microcavity cases, which brings the UP lifetime in our system into
the picosecond time scale (see SI Figure 11 for more details).Characterization of the excited states
of polaritonic systems is
necessary for the advancement of optoelectronic applications of hybrid
light–matter coupling, particularly in nonlinear optics, but
has remained ambiguous in the current state of the field. We have
proposed a rigorous interpretation of excited state spectral features
in cavity coupled systems. To avoid difficulties in distinguishing
between vibrational overtone transitions and spectral crowding in
less strongly coupled electronic cavity systems, we studied an ultrastrong
electronic cavity coupled system. We compared experimental pump–probe
data to predictions from a quantum mechanical model. The spectral
assignments we have proposed may be used to uncover details of polariton
dynamics in other systems or for the purposes of quantum control.
Taking advantage of the multiple pathways available to arrive at the
2ω state, coherent control experiments can provide additional
avenues for polariton exploration.[39] The
design of experiments to probe states within the three-particle manifold
and higher as well as fluorescence upconversion studies that can capture
the fast emission from the LP also provide suitable platforms for
further polariton investigation. One other significant area of interest
that remains to be explored is the presence and role of dark states
in electronically coupled systems; moving beyond the ultrafast time
scale to observe dynamics within the cavity system at later times
will provide information about the long-lived states within the cavity,
including the elusive dark states.
Authors: Jino George; Shaojun Wang; Thibault Chervy; Antoine Canaguier-Durand; Gael Schaeffer; Jean-Marie Lehn; James A Hutchison; Cyriaque Genet; Thomas W Ebbesen Journal: Faraday Discuss Date: 2015-02-26 Impact factor: 4.008
Authors: Bo Xiang; Raphael F Ribeiro; Liying Chen; Jiaxi Wang; Matthew Du; Joel Yuen-Zhou; Wei Xiong Journal: J Phys Chem A Date: 2019-07-03 Impact factor: 2.781
Authors: Raphael F Ribeiro; Adam D Dunkelberger; Bo Xiang; Wei Xiong; Blake S Simpkins; Jeffrey C Owrutsky; Joel Yuen-Zhou Journal: J Phys Chem Lett Date: 2018-06-26 Impact factor: 6.475
Authors: Tal Schwartz; James A Hutchison; Jérémie Léonard; Cyriaque Genet; Stefan Haacke; Thomas W Ebbesen Journal: Chemphyschem Date: 2012-12-11 Impact factor: 3.102
Authors: James A Hutchison; Andrea Liscio; Tal Schwartz; Antoine Canaguier-Durand; Cyriaque Genet; Vincenzo Palermo; Paolo Samorì; Thomas W Ebbesen Journal: Adv Mater Date: 2013-03-06 Impact factor: 30.849
Authors: Bo Xiang; Raphael F Ribeiro; Yingmin Li; Adam D Dunkelberger; Blake B Simpkins; Joel Yuen-Zhou; Wei Xiong Journal: Sci Adv Date: 2019-09-27 Impact factor: 14.136