Literature DB >> 32186341

Ten Years Later: Reflections on Critics' Worst-Case Scenarios for the Affordable Care Act.

Stacey McMorrow1, Linda J Blumberg1, John Holahan1.   

Abstract

The primary goals of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) were to increase the availability and affordability of health insurance coverage and thereby improve access to needed health care services. Numerous studies have overwhelmingly confirmed that the law has reduced uninsurance and improved affordability of coverage and care for millions of Americans. Not everyone believed that the ACA would lead to positive outcomes, however. Critics raised numerous concerns in the years leading up to the law's passage and full implementation, including about its consequences for national health spending, labor supply, employer health insurance markets, provider capacity, and overall population health. This article considers five frequently heard worst-case scenarios related to the ACA and provides research evidence that these fears did not come to pass.
Copyright © 2020 by Duke University Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  access to care; health care costs; health insurance coverage; health reform

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32186341     DOI: 10.1215/03616878-8255421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law        ISSN: 0361-6878            Impact factor:   2.265


  1 in total

1.  Association between median household income, state Medicaid expansion status, and COVID-19 outcomes across US counties.

Authors:  Tsikata Apenyo; Antonio Elias Vera-Urbina; Khansa Ahmad; Tracey H Taveira; Wen-Chih Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 3.752

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.