Tyler A Powell1, Vincent Mysliwiec2, James K Aden3, Michael J Morris3. 1. Sleep Medicine Service, Wilford Hall Ambulatory Surgical Center, JBSA Lackland AFB, San Antonio, TX, 78234, USA. powellt8808@gmail.com. 2. Sleep Medicine Service, Wilford Hall Ambulatory Surgical Center, JBSA Lackland AFB, San Antonio, TX, 78234, USA. 3. Graduate Medical Education, Brooke Army Medical Center, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Exposure to elevated concentrations of respirable particulate matter (< 10 μm) may influence sleep-disordered breathing. Burn pits as utilized by the US military in the Middle East until 2011 produced elevated particle matter concentrations. We seek to determine if subjective exposure to burn pits during deployment affects prevalence or severity of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in military personnel. METHODS: As part of a prospective observational study of previously deployed military personnel with exertional dyspnea (n = 145), all patients underwent pulmonary function testing, screening for burn pit exposure, and if warranted by questionnaires, overnight polysomnography. A total of 100 patients completed all testing. For analysis, patients were classified into a burn pit exposure group (45 patients) and a no exposure group (55 patients). Additional analyses were performed on those endorsing burn pit maintenance during deployment (25 patients) and those with > 12 h of daily exposure (17 patients). RESULTS: The prevalence of OSA, defined by apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) > 5/h, was similarly high in both groups (69% vs. 71%, p = 0.83). Surprisingly, the mean AHI was lower in the exposed group (12.8/h vs. 19.7/h, p = 0.04) while nadir of oxygen saturation was similar (87% vs. 86%, p = 0.39). Subgroup analyses revealed similar findings in those who performed burn pit maintenance (prevalence = 80%, p = 0.58; AHI = 14.8, p = 0.16) and those with > 12 h of daily exposure (prevalence = 88%, p = 0.33; AHI = 18.0, p = 0.62). CONCLUSIONS: Subjective burn pit exposure does not appear to influence OSA development in previously deployed military personnel. Given the high rate of OSA in this cohort, continued investigation of deployment exposures which may influence sleep-disordered breathing is recommended.
PURPOSE: Exposure to elevated concentrations of respirable particulate matter (< 10 μm) may influence sleep-disordered breathing. Burn pits as utilized by the US military in the Middle East until 2011 produced elevated particle matter concentrations. We seek to determine if subjective exposure to burn pits during deployment affects prevalence or severity of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in military personnel. METHODS: As part of a prospective observational study of previously deployed military personnel with exertional dyspnea (n = 145), all patients underwent pulmonary function testing, screening for burn pit exposure, and if warranted by questionnaires, overnight polysomnography. A total of 100 patients completed all testing. For analysis, patients were classified into a burn pit exposure group (45 patients) and a no exposure group (55 patients). Additional analyses were performed on those endorsing burn pit maintenance during deployment (25 patients) and those with > 12 h of daily exposure (17 patients). RESULTS: The prevalence of OSA, defined by apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) > 5/h, was similarly high in both groups (69% vs. 71%, p = 0.83). Surprisingly, the mean AHI was lower in the exposed group (12.8/h vs. 19.7/h, p = 0.04) while nadir of oxygen saturation was similar (87% vs. 86%, p = 0.39). Subgroup analyses revealed similar findings in those who performed burn pit maintenance (prevalence = 80%, p = 0.58; AHI = 14.8, p = 0.16) and those with > 12 h of daily exposure (prevalence = 88%, p = 0.33; AHI = 18.0, p = 0.62). CONCLUSIONS: Subjective burn pit exposure does not appear to influence OSA development in previously deployed military personnel. Given the high rate of OSA in this cohort, continued investigation of deployment exposures which may influence sleep-disordered breathing is recommended.
Authors: Teresa M Powell; Tyler C Smith; Isabel G Jacobson; Edward J Boyko; Tomoko I Hooper; Gary D Gackstetter; Christopher J Phillips; Besa Smith Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Besa Smith; Charlene A Wong; Edward J Boyko; Christopher J Phillips; Gary D Gackstetter; Margaret A K Ryan; Tyler C Smith Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Christopher J Lettieri; Am H Eliasson; Teotimo Andrada; Andrei Khramtsov; Marc Raphaelson; David A Kristo Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2005-10-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Michael J Morris; Darrel W Dodson; Pedro F Lucero; Georgette D Haislip; Roger A Gallup; Karin L Nicholson; Lisa L Zacher Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2014-07-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Matthew S King; Rosana Eisenberg; John H Newman; James J Tolle; Frank E Harrell; Hui Nian; Mathew Ninan; Eric S Lambright; James R Sheller; Joyce E Johnson; Robert F Miller Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-07-21 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jason Liu; Nicholas Lezama; Joseph Gasper; Jennifer Kawata; Sybil Morley; Drew Helmer; Paul Ciminera Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 2.162