Vasilena Zheleva1, Rebecca A Nelson2, Sinziana Dumitra3, Nayana L Vora4, Lily L Lai5. 1. Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA. 2. Department of Information Sciences, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA. 3. Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA. 5. Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA. llai@coh.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To optimize breast cancer care, the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer developed quality measures regarding receipt and timing of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT). Nationwide compliance with these measures and its impact on overall survival (OS) are evaluated herein. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 285,291) diagnosed with invasive breast cancer from 2004 to 2012 were identified from the National Cancer Database. Compliance with RT administration within 365 days from diagnosis was determined for patients with stage III disease with ≥ 4 positive lymph nodes post mastectomy and stage I-III disease post breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess factors associated with compliance and OS, respectively. RESULTS: In the mastectomy cohort, 66.9% received timely RT, showing improved OS versus no RT patients (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.67-0.73). Delayed RT patients (≥ 365 days) achieved equivalent OS to those receiving timely RT (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.93-1.23) and superior OS to no RT patients (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.65-0.85). In the BCS cohort, 89.4% received timely RT, showing improved OS versus no RT patients (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.45-0.49). Delayed RT was associated with improved OS versus no RT (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.56-0.74) and decreased OS versus timely RT (HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.19-1.58). Factors associated with noncompliance included insurance type and distance to hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Quality measure compliance with adjuvant RT improves OS, regardless of timing after mastectomy. However, timeliness does impact OS after BCS. Focus on modifiable factors to improve compliance such as access to care may lead to improved compliance and OS.
BACKGROUND: To optimize breast cancer care, the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer developed quality measures regarding receipt and timing of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT). Nationwide compliance with these measures and its impact on overall survival (OS) are evaluated herein. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 285,291) diagnosed with invasive breast cancer from 2004 to 2012 were identified from the National Cancer Database. Compliance with RT administration within 365 days from diagnosis was determined for patients with stage III disease with ≥ 4 positive lymph nodes post mastectomy and stage I-III disease post breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess factors associated with compliance and OS, respectively. RESULTS: In the mastectomy cohort, 66.9% received timely RT, showing improved OS versus no RT patients (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.67-0.73). Delayed RT patients (≥ 365 days) achieved equivalent OS to those receiving timely RT (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.93-1.23) and superior OS to no RT patients (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.65-0.85). In the BCS cohort, 89.4% received timely RT, showing improved OS versus no RT patients (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.45-0.49). Delayed RT was associated with improved OS versus no RT (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.56-0.74) and decreased OS versus timely RT (HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.19-1.58). Factors associated with noncompliance included insurance type and distance to hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Quality measure compliance with adjuvant RT improves OS, regardless of timing after mastectomy. However, timeliness does impact OS after BCS. Focus on modifiable factors to improve compliance such as access to care may lead to improved compliance and OS.
Authors: Daniel P Nussbaum; Christel N Rushing; Zhifei Sun; Babatunde A Yerokun; Mathias Worni; Robert S Saunders; Mark B McClellan; Donna Niedzwiecki; Rachel A Greenup; Dan G Blazer Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2021-05-04 Impact factor: 4.452