Franz L Ricklefs1, Krystian D Fita1, Roman Rotermund1, Andras Piffko1, Simone Schmid2, David Capper2, Rolf Buslei3, Michael Buchfelder4, Till Burkhardt5, Jakob Matschke6, Katrin Lamszus1, Manfred Westphal1, Ulrich Schüller7,8,9, Jörg Flitsch10. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. 2. Department of Neuropathology, Charité University Medical Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany. 3. Institute of Pathology, Sozialstiftung Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany. 4. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany. 5. Department of Neurosurgery, Friedrich-Ebert-Hospital, Neumünster, Germany. 6. Institute of Neuropathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. 7. Institute of Neuropathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. u.schueller@uke.de. 8. Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. u.schueller@uke.de. 9. Research Institute Children's Cancer Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany. u.schueller@uke.de. 10. Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. flitsch@uke.de.
Corticotroph adenomas express adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) and may result in Cushing’s disease (CD), if associated with measurable or elevated blood ACTH and cortisol levels. Silent ACTHadenomas (SCA) that express ACTH, but do not cause hypercortisolism might exhibit a more aggressive course and are currently classified as “aggressive pituitary gland tumors” according to the WHO classification [5]. However, SCA and CD may only be distinguished by extensive endocrinological testing, which often is ambiguous and may include subclinical CD.We analyzed tumor samples from patients, who underwent transsphenoidal resection of histologically proven ACTHadenomas (Fig. 1a) to detect DNA methylation-based subgroups that may predict the patients’ clinical phenotype. Twenty-three patients were clinically silent (SCA), whereas fourty-nine patients had an endocrinological proven CD. In general, SCApatients had significantly larger tumors as measured by MRI (Fig. 1b). Other details of patients and tumors are described in Online Supplementary Table 1.
Fig.1
Genome-wide DNA methylation profiles split ACTH adenomas into clinically relevant subgroups. a Corticotroph adenomas causing either Cushing’s disease (CD) or being clinically silent (SCA) show strong expression of adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH). Scale bar: 100 µm. b SCA patients have larger tumors in comparison to CD as measured by MRI (p < 0.0001). c Cumulative copy number alterations (CNA) inferred from the DNA methylation data. Healthy pituitary gland samples derived from the publicly accessible Capper set [2] were used as controls. d Heat map using pairwise Pearson correlation coefficients of the 10,000 most variable CpG features across all 36 samples reveals two distinct CD and SCA clusters and a third group with a clinically heterogeneous picture. No AL = no anterior lobe. eT-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE) of all methylation probes indicates that SCA and CDs are distinguishable by their epigenetic profiles. fT-SNE analysis with all 36 ACTH adenomas merged with the CNS tumor reference cohort from Capper et al. (2018).
Genome-wide DNA methylation profiles split ACTHadenomas into clinically relevant subgroups. a Corticotroph adenomas causing either Cushing’s disease (CD) or being clinically silent (SCA) show strong expression of adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH). Scale bar: 100 µm. b SCApatients have larger tumors in comparison to CD as measured by MRI (p < 0.0001). c Cumulative copy number alterations (CNA) inferred from the DNA methylation data. Healthy pituitary gland samples derived from the publicly accessible Capper set [2] were used as controls. d Heat map using pairwise Pearson correlation coefficients of the 10,000 most variable CpG features across all 36 samples reveals two distinct CD and SCA clusters and a third group with a clinically heterogeneous picture. No AL = no anterior lobe. eT-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE) of all methylation probes indicates that SCA and CDs are distinguishable by their epigenetic profiles. fT-SNE analysis with all 36 ACTHadenomas merged with the CNS tumor reference cohort from Capper et al. (2018).By analyses of 850k or 450k Illumina arrays, we compared genome-wide DNA methylation profiles of 36 cases (CD:15 SCA:21). Copy number profiling inferred from DNA methylation data revealed cytogenetic aberration across all analyzed samples. SCA had a predominance for amplification of chromosomes 5, 7–9, 12–14, 16 and 19–20, yet only in 30–50% of cases (Fig. 1c).Regarding DNA methylation, unsupervised hierarchical clustering of all samples using pairwise Pearson correlation coefficients distinguished CD and SCA as two separate clusters, while a third group was heterogeneous regarding its clinical manifestation (Fig. 1d). USP8 mutations were only found in CD, but GATA3 expression exclusively appeared in SCA cases. T-distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE) further supported that SCA and CDs are distinguishable by their epigenetic profiles (Fig. 1e), which is specifically true for POMC regulatory gene regions (online supplementary Figure 1). Besides one case of CD, 4/8 non-CD cases within the heterogeneous third group had subclinical signs of CD, yet not fulfilling the required criteria to be diagnosed with CD [1]. Merging of our samples with the CNS tumor reference cohort from Capper et al. 2018 [2] reveals that about half of the reference cases cluster to our cases known as CD, whereas the remaining cases group together with SCA cases (Fig. 1f). Furthermore, gonadotroph adenomas show a spatial relationship with silent ACTHadenomas, which has also been suggested by Neou et al., who recently generated a pangenomic classification of pituitary tumors [6]. Since the DNA methylation imprint of a tumor cell is thought to occur at an early time point during tumorigenesis and to remain stable during progression [3], our data also imply a distinct tumor pathogenesis of CD and SCA adenomas with a potential “intermediate state” that clinically presents as a subclinical CD, but was as yet not separable neuropathologically. Indeed, our data suggest that genome-wide DNA methylation profiles allow subgrouping of SCA and CD adenomas that might not be achievable by standard endocrinological testing or histopathology.Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.Supplementary file1 (TIF 15419 kb)Supplementary file2 (DOCX 50 kb)
Authors: C Dimopoulou; J Schopohl; W Rachinger; M Buchfelder; J Honegger; M Reincke; G K Stalla Journal: Eur J Endocrinol Date: 2013-12-21 Impact factor: 6.664
Authors: David Capper; David T W Jones; Martin Sill; Volker Hovestadt; Daniel Schrimpf; Dominik Sturm; Christian Koelsche; Felix Sahm; Lukas Chavez; David E Reuss; Annekathrin Kratz; Annika K Wefers; Kristin Huang; Kristian W Pajtler; Leonille Schweizer; Damian Stichel; Adriana Olar; Nils W Engel; Kerstin Lindenberg; Patrick N Harter; Anne K Braczynski; Karl H Plate; Hildegard Dohmen; Boyan K Garvalov; Roland Coras; Annett Hölsken; Ekkehard Hewer; Melanie Bewerunge-Hudler; Matthias Schick; Roger Fischer; Rudi Beschorner; Jens Schittenhelm; Ori Staszewski; Khalida Wani; Pascale Varlet; Melanie Pages; Petra Temming; Dietmar Lohmann; Florian Selt; Hendrik Witt; Till Milde; Olaf Witt; Eleonora Aronica; Felice Giangaspero; Elisabeth Rushing; Wolfram Scheurlen; Christoph Geisenberger; Fausto J Rodriguez; Albert Becker; Matthias Preusser; Christine Haberler; Rolf Bjerkvig; Jane Cryan; Michael Farrell; Martina Deckert; Jürgen Hench; Stephan Frank; Jonathan Serrano; Kasthuri Kannan; Aristotelis Tsirigos; Wolfgang Brück; Silvia Hofer; Stefanie Brehmer; Marcel Seiz-Rosenhagen; Daniel Hänggi; Volkmar Hans; Stephanie Rozsnoki; Jordan R Hansford; Patricia Kohlhof; Bjarne W Kristensen; Matt Lechner; Beatriz Lopes; Christian Mawrin; Ralf Ketter; Andreas Kulozik; Ziad Khatib; Frank Heppner; Arend Koch; Anne Jouvet; Catherine Keohane; Helmut Mühleisen; Wolf Mueller; Ute Pohl; Marco Prinz; Axel Benner; Marc Zapatka; Nicholas G Gottardo; Pablo Hernáiz Driever; Christof M Kramm; Hermann L Müller; Stefan Rutkowski; Katja von Hoff; Michael C Frühwald; Astrid Gnekow; Gudrun Fleischhack; Stephan Tippelt; Gabriele Calaminus; Camelia-Maria Monoranu; Arie Perry; Chris Jones; Thomas S Jacques; Bernhard Radlwimmer; Marco Gessi; Torsten Pietsch; Johannes Schramm; Gabriele Schackert; Manfred Westphal; Guido Reifenberger; Pieter Wesseling; Michael Weller; Vincent Peter Collins; Ingmar Blümcke; Martin Bendszus; Jürgen Debus; Annie Huang; Nada Jabado; Paul A Northcott; Werner Paulus; Amar Gajjar; Giles W Robinson; Michael D Taylor; Zane Jaunmuktane; Marina Ryzhova; Michael Platten; Andreas Unterberg; Wolfgang Wick; Matthias A Karajannis; Michel Mittelbronn; Till Acker; Christian Hartmann; Kenneth Aldape; Ulrich Schüller; Rolf Buslei; Peter Lichter; Marcel Kool; Christel Herold-Mende; David W Ellison; Martin Hasselblatt; Matija Snuderl; Sebastian Brandner; Andrey Korshunov; Andreas von Deimling; Stefan M Pfister Journal: Nature Date: 2018-03-14 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: David Capper; Damian Stichel; Felix Sahm; David T W Jones; Daniel Schrimpf; Martin Sill; Simone Schmid; Volker Hovestadt; David E Reuss; Christian Koelsche; Annekathrin Reinhardt; Annika K Wefers; Kristin Huang; Philipp Sievers; Azadeh Ebrahimi; Anne Schöler; Daniel Teichmann; Arend Koch; Daniel Hänggi; Andreas Unterberg; Michael Platten; Wolfgang Wick; Olaf Witt; Till Milde; Andrey Korshunov; Stefan M Pfister; Andreas von Deimling Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2018-07-02 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Maritza S Mosella; Thais S Sabedot; Tiago C Silva; Tathiane M Malta; Felipe Segato Dezem; Karam P Asmaro; Michael Wells; Abir Mukherjee; Laila M Poisson; James Snyder; Ana C deCarvalho; Tobias Walbert; Todd Aho; Steven Kalkanis; Paula C Elias; Sonir R Antonini; Jack Rock; Houtan Noushmehr; Margaret Castro; Ana Valeria Castro Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2021-08-02 Impact factor: 12.300