Literature DB >> 32185420

Revisiting hybrid breeding designs using genomic predictions: simulations highlight the superiority of incomplete factorials between segregating families over topcross designs.

A I Seye1, C Bauland1, A Charcosset1, L Moreau2.   

Abstract

KEY MESSAGE: Simulations showed that hybrid performances issued from an incomplete factorial between segregating families of two heterotic groups enable to calibrate genomic predictions of hybrid value more efficiently than tester-based designs. Genomic selection offers new opportunities to revisit hybrid breeding by replacing extensive phenotyping of hybrid combinations by genomic predictions. A key question remains to identify the best design to calibrate genomic prediction models. We proposed to use single-cross hybrids issued from an incomplete factorial design between segregating populations and compared this strategy with a conventional approach based on topcross evaluation. Two multiparental segregating populations of lines, each specific of one heterotic group, were simulated. Hybrids considered as training sets were generated using either (1) a parental line from the opposite group as tester or (2) following an incomplete factorial design. Different specific combining ability (SCA) proportions were simulated by considering different levels of group divergence and dominance effects for the simulated QTL. For the incomplete factorial design, for a same number of hybrids, we considered different numbers of parental lines and different contributions of lines (one to four) to calibration hybrids. We evaluated for different training set sizes prediction accuracies of new hybrids and genetic gains along three generations. At a given training set size, factorial design was as efficient (considering accuracy) as tester design in additive scenarios, but significantly outperformed tester design when SCA was present. The contribution number of each parental line to the incomplete factorial design had a small impact on accuracies. Our simulations confirmed experimental results and showed that calibrating models on hybrids between two multiparental populations is a cost-efficient way to perform genomic predictions in both groups, opening prospects for revisiting reciprocal recurrent selection schemes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32185420     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-020-03573-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  6 in total

1.  Building a Calibration Set for Genomic Prediction, Characteristics to Be Considered, and Optimization Approaches.

Authors:  Simon Rio; Alain Charcosset; Tristan Mary-Huard; Laurence Moreau; Renaud Rincent
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

2.  Genomic prediction of hybrid performance: comparison of the efficiency of factorial and tester designs used as training sets in a multiparental connected reciprocal design for maize silage.

Authors:  Alizarine Lorenzi; Cyril Bauland; Tristan Mary-Huard; Sophie Pin; Carine Palaffre; Colin Guillaume; Christina Lehermeier; Alain Charcosset; Laurence Moreau
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 5.574

3.  Genotyping marker density and prediction models effects in long-term breeding schemes of cross-pollinated crops.

Authors:  Júlio César DoVale; Humberto Fanelli Carvalho; Felipe Sabadin; Roberto Fritsche-Neto
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 5.574

4.  Genomic Prediction of Complex Traits in an Allogamous Annual Crop: The Case of Maize Single-Cross Hybrids.

Authors:  Isadora Cristina Martins Oliveira; Arthur Bernardeli; José Henrique Soler Guilhen; Maria Marta Pastina
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

5.  Advances in Breeding for Mixed Cropping - Incomplete Factorials and the Producer/Associate Concept.

Authors:  Benedikt Haug; Monika M Messmer; Jérôme Enjalbert; Isabelle Goldringer; Emma Forst; Timothée Flutre; Tristan Mary-Huard; Pierre Hohmann
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  Why and How to Switch to Genomic Selection: Lessons From Plant and Animal Breeding Experience.

Authors:  Aline Fugeray-Scarbel; Catherine Bastien; Mathilde Dupont-Nivet; Stéphane Lemarié
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 4.599

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.