| Literature DB >> 32185210 |
Fang Jingxian1, Liu Yang1, Liu Qiong1, Qian Hong1, Liu Hedi1, Zhang Jinglan1, Liu Fang1, Yang Jing1, Wu Xiaoming1, Song Yingying1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Study the effect of quality control circle (QCC) in promoting the usage of rubber dams (RD) in root canal treatment of chronic pulpitis in primary teeth.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32185210 PMCID: PMC7061100 DOI: 10.1155/2020/5397838
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Houpt's behavioral rating scale for rubber dam treatment.
| Score | Description |
|---|---|
| 1 | Aborted, no treatment rendered |
| 2 | Poor treatment interrupted, only partial treatment completed |
| 3 | Fair treatment interrupted, but eventually all completed |
| 4 | Few treatment interrupted, but eventually all completed |
| 5 | Very good, some limited crying or movement (e.g., during anesthesia or mouth prop insertion) |
| 6 | Excellent, treatment completed |
Comparison of Houpt's score and clinical operation time between the two groups.
| Houpt's score (points) | Chairside operation time (min) | |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental group | 5.80 ± 0.52 | 13.20 ± 1.81 |
| Control group | 5.05 ± 1.01 | 18.58 ± 2.27 |
.
The comparison of intraoperative and postoperative complications between two groups.
| Experimental group (%) | Control group (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| Intraoperative discomfort | 10.00 | 0 |
| Gingival bleeding caused by clamp | 30.00 | 0 |
| Mucosal bleeding caused by saliva suction | 0 | 35.00 |
| Provoke or vomiting | 0 | 55.00 |
| Postoperative discomfort | 5.00 | 5.00 |
P < 0.01.