SHIP2 (SH2-domain containing inositol 5-phosphatase type 2) is a canonical 5-phosphatase, which, through its catalytic action on PtdInsP3, regulates the PI3K/Akt pathway and metabolic action of insulin. It is a drug target, but there is limited evidence of inhibition of SHIP2 by small molecules in the literature. With the goal to investigate inhibition, we report a homologous family of synthetic, chromophoric benzene phosphate substrates of SHIP2 that display the headgroup regiochemical hallmarks of the physiological inositide substrates that have proved difficult to crystallize with 5-phosphatases. Using time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT), we explore the intrinsic fluorescence of these novel substrates and show how fluorescence can be used to assay enzyme activity. The TD-DFT approach promises to inform rational design of enhanced active site probes for the broadest family of inositide-binding/metabolizing proteins, while maintaining the regiochemical properties of bona fide inositide substrates.
SHIP2 (SH2-domain containing inositol 5-phosphatase type 2) is a canonical 5-phosphatase, which, through its catalytic action on PtdInsP3, regulates the PI3K/Akt pathway and metabolic action of insulin. It is a drug target, but there is limited evidence of inhibition of SHIP2 by small molecules in the literature. With the goal to investigate inhibition, we report a homologous family of synthetic, chromophoric benzene phosphate substrates of SHIP2 that display the headgroup regiochemical hallmarks of the physiological inositide substrates that have proved difficult to crystallize with 5-phosphatases. Using time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT), we explore the intrinsic fluorescence of these novel substrates and show how fluorescence can be used to assay enzyme activity. The TD-DFT approach promises to inform rational design of enhanced active site probes for the broadest family of inositide-binding/metabolizing proteins, while maintaining the regiochemical properties of bona fide inositide substrates.
In eukaryotic cells, many signaling
pathways are regulated by levels of inositol phosphates (inositides),
phosphatidylinositol phosphates (phosphoinositides), and the proteins
that are their cognate binding partners. The balance of these is controlled
by families of kinases and phosphatases that phosphorylate and dephosphorylate
these molecules at specific positions, designated locants, of the
inositol ring.[1] SH2-domain containing inositol
5-phosphatase type 2 (SHIP2) belongs to a family of phosphatases that
hydrolyze the 5-phosphate of inositides and phosphoinositides. The
substrates are known to include inositol pentakisphosphates (InsP5), tetrakisphosphates (InsP4), trisphosphates (InsP3), phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate (PtdInsP3), and phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PtdInsP2).[2]An understanding of how these
enzymes function is important to
pathologies such as diabetes and cancer.[2] SHIP2 reduces levels of PtdInsP3, while increasing levels
of PtdIns(3,4)P2. Consequently, this enzyme regulates the
PI3K/Akt pathway that is linked to cell proliferation and the metabolic
action of insulin.[3,4] SHIP2 is expressed in many cell
types and has additionally been linked to regulation of diverse cellular
processes such as calcium signaling, cytoskeletal remodeling, protein
trafficking, and phagocytosis.[2,5] While a mechanistic
explanation of inhibition of PI3-kinases has underpinned therapeutic
interventions in cancer,[6,7] therapeutic inhibition
of 5-phosphatases lacks similar foundation.Previous research
for inhibitors of SHIP2 has typically assayed
activity using phosphate release with d-myo-inositol-1,3,4,5-tetrakisphosphate (Ins(1,3,4,5)P4) or d-myo-phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate
(PtdIns(3,4,5)P3).[8] Thus, Suwa
et al. identified AS1949490 as a novel, small molecule inhibitor of
SHIP2. In the absence of structural data or evidence of catalytic
modification of the inhibitor, the exact mode of inhibition is not
clear, though from an enzymological perspective the nature of inhibition
is competitive with respect to inositide substrate. It is possible
that within the chemical landscape of inhibition, competitive substrate
analog inhibitors will be found. However, further mechanistic analysis
would require identification of the products of such reactions, something
limited for bona fide substrates by lack of a suitable
chromophore in these molecules. Alternatively, radiolabeled substrates
could be used, but this would demand complex synthetic work and HPLC
resolution of substrates and products.With a view to finding
alternative substrates of 5-phosphatases
that have analytically useful chromophoric properties, we investigated
the benzene polyphosphate compounds shown in Figure . Originally, the benzene phosphate compounds 1 to 6 were designed as substrate analogs to
substitute as ligands to inositol phosphate binding proteins/enzymes,
enabling crystallographic resolution of protein–ligand complexes
and insight into enzyme inhibition.[9,10] While simple
benzene phosphates appear not to be substrates of 5-phosphatases,[9−11] compound 7, 3-OH-Bz(1,2,4)P3, was synthesized
and has been shown by assay of release of phosphate to be a substrate
for type I myo-inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate-5-phosphatase
(INPP5A).[11] Benzene phosphate analogues
were also used to uncover mechanistic information in cocrystallization
studies with INPP5B.[12]
Figure 1
Structures of benzene
phosphates used in this study.
Structures of benzene
phosphates used in this study.We now show that the chromophoric properties of benzene phosphates
vary depending on the regiochemistry of substituents around the benzene
ring and that several members of this family have an unanticipated,
useful, intrinsic fluorescence. Alongside conventional spectroscopic
measurements, we use time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT)
to examine how the regiochemistry modifies the spectroscopic properties.
Compound 6, Bz(1,2,4,5)P4, proved to be intensely
fluorescent, a property potentially explainable by TD-DFT. It is a
tantalizing observation that the four phosphate groups of this compound
are stereochemically homotopic, remaining indistinguishable even in
the chiral environment of the enzyme active site. Since 5-phosphatases
yield only a single product from Ins(1,3,4,5)P4, should
benzene phosphates be substrates, we expect a single, identifiable
product 8 5-OH-Bz(1,2,4)P3 of the dephosphorylation
of compound 6 Bz(1,2,4,5)P4. Compound 8 5-OH-Bz(1,2,4)P3 was, however, not synthesized,
so in the absence of reference material, we sought to use TD-DFT to
predict its fluorescence with the expectation of being able to use
this prediction to identify whether compound 6 Bz(1,2,4,5)P4 could be a substrate of SHIP2. We therefore investigated
the possibility that benzene phosphates themselves are substrates
for dephosphorylation by SHIP2 and the chromophoric properties of
this class of molecule might allow construction of assays complementary
to those that employ the measurement of released inorganic phosphate.Previously, benzene phosphates have been shown to be inhibitors
of INPP5A,[7] INPP5B,[12] and SHIP2,[8] with compound 6 Bz(1,2,4,5)P4 yielding IC50 values
in single figures and tens of micromolar range against Ins(1,4,5)P3 and Ins(1,3,4,5)P4 substrates, tested at 1 and
100 μM concentrations, respectively. We also recently described
the use of a fluorescent conjugate of Ins(1,3,4,5,6)P5 (2-FAM-InsP5, Figure )
as an active site probe of inositol pentakisphosphate 2-kinase[13] and as an intracellular probe.[14] Here, combining the use of two classes of ligand, we show
that displacement of 2-FAM-InsP5 affords an assay of benzene
phosphate binding to SHIP2 (Figure and Table ).
Figure 2
Displacement of 2-FAM-InsP5 from SHIP2 by benzene phosphates.
The experiments used 2 nM 2-FAM-InsP5 and 1 μM SHIP2.
Results shown as mean of triplicate experiments (results with standard
deviations given in Table ).
Table 1
Comparison of Published
IC50 Values for Inhibition of 5-Phosphatases by Benzene
Phosphates to
Experimentally Determined IC50 Values Found for Displacement
of 2-FAM-InsP5 from SHIP2
compound
IC50 (μM) 2-FAM-InsP5 SHIP2, this study
IC50 (μM) Ins(1,3,4,5)P4 SHIP2[10,12]
IC50 (μM) Ins(1,4,5)P3 INPP5A[9]
IC50 (μM) Ins(1,4,5)P3 INPP5B[12]
Bz(1,2,3)P3
14.23 ± 0.1
>1000
86 ± 28
33.5 ± 6.8
Bz(1,3,5)P3
11.25 ± 2.9
16 ± 9
Bz(1,2,4)P3
7.02 ± 0.05
14 ± 9
Bz(1,2,3,4)P4
2.78 ± 0.59
98 ± 16
Bz(1,2,3,5)P4
1.01 ± 0.43
78 ± 50
Bz(1,2,4,5)P4
1.02 ± 0.1
69.3 ± 15.4[10]
4 ± 2
6.3 ± 0.8
108.3 ± 20.3[12]
Displacement of 2-FAM-InsP5 from SHIP2 by benzene phosphates.
The experiments used 2 nM 2-FAM-InsP5 and 1 μM SHIP2.
Results shown as mean of triplicate experiments (results with standard
deviations given in Table ).All six benzene phosphate derivatives chosen displaced
2 nM 2-FAM-InsP5 from SHIP2 with IC50 values
in the low micromolar
range, the benzene tetrakisphosphates being more effective than benzene
trisphosphates, with IC50 values approximately 1 order
of magnitude smaller than the trisphosphates.Most commonly,
5-phosphatase activity is assayed as the release
of inorganic phosphate from Ins(1,3,4,5)P4 or PtdIns(3,4,5)P3. We assayed the ability of SHIP2 to release phosphate from
inositol phosphates and also benzene phosphates. We tested whether,
by virtue of the lower pKa of the hydroxyl
of a theoretical dephosphorylated benzene phosphate (leaving group),[15,16] benzene phosphates might be better substrates than simple inositol
phosphate substrate (Figure ).
Figure 3
Benzene phosphates as substrates of SHIP2. Compounds tested at
100 μM. For Ins(1,3,4,5)P4 and InsP6,
the concentration of SHIP2 was 1 μM and for the benzene phosphates,
4 μM, with triplicate reactions run for 10 min at 30 °C.
Benzene phosphates as substrates of SHIP2. Compounds tested at
100 μM. For Ins(1,3,4,5)P4 and InsP6,
the concentration of SHIP2 was 1 μM and for the benzene phosphates,
4 μM, with triplicate reactions run for 10 min at 30 °C.Ins(1,3,4,5)P4 and InsP6 were
included as
positive and negative controls, respectively. Phosphate release was
determined with molybdenum blue, using ferrous sulfate as a reducing
agent.[17] While slower than the reaction
with Ins(1,3,4,5)P4, phosphatase activity was noted with
all compounds except InsP6, a substrate for phytases[18] but not for inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatases.
As the benzene phosphates are poorer substrates than Ins(1,3,4,5)P4, the rate of dephosphorylation must be influenced by factors
other than just the pKa of the leaving
group. In an earlier study,[11] we postulated
that OH groups in the substrate are likely to have a mechanistic role,
showing that during dephosphorylation of compound 7 3-OH-Bz(1,2,4)P3 by INPP5A, stabilization of the phenolic OH proton accompanied
deprotonation of the phosphate groups. In order to test this theory,
we compared phosphate release from compound 7 3-OH-Bz(1,2,4)P3 and compound 4 Bz(1,2,3,4)P4 (Figure S1). The rate determined for compound 7 3-OH-Bz(1,2,4)P3 was almost twice that observed
for compound 4 Bz(1,2,3,4)P4. However, this
rate is comparable to that observed for compound 5 Bz(1,2,3,5)P4, suggesting that the regiochemistry of the ring substitution
may also have an influence.Having gained evidence for binding
of benzene phosphates to SHIP2
and their catalytic processing by SHIP2, we speculated that the spectroscopic
properties of benzene phosphates might be exploited to follow catalysis.
Excitation and emission scans of acetonitrile solutions of compound 4 Bz(1,2,3,4)P4, compound 5 Bz(1,2,3,5)P4, compound 6 Bz(1,2,4,5)P4, and tryptophan
were measured, and the spectral details compared to those predicted
by TD-DFT (Figure and Tables S1 and S2). Spectral predictions
for compound 8 5-OH-Bz(1,2,4)P3 are included
in the table, but the pure compound was not available to test. The
theoretical methods employ approaches used in TD-DFT studies of tryptophan.[19,20] A detailed discussion of the TD-DFT methods and results is included
in Supporting Information.
Figure 4
Fluorescence spectra
of 500 μM Bz(1,2,3,4)P4 (cyan
line), 500 μM Bz(1,2,3,5)P4 (green line), 100 μM
Bz(1,2,4,5)P4 (blue line), and 10 μM tryptophan (black
dotted line) in acetonitrile. (A) Excitation scans determined at emission
maxima and (B) emission scans excited at 280 nm.
Fluorescence spectra
of 500 μM Bz(1,2,3,4)P4 (cyan
line), 500 μM Bz(1,2,3,5)P4 (green line), 100 μM
Bz(1,2,4,5)P4 (blue line), and 10 μM tryptophan (black
dotted line) in acetonitrile. (A) Excitation scans determined at emission
maxima and (B) emission scans excited at 280 nm.Significantly, on excitation at 280 nm, the measured fluorescence
of compound 6 Bz(1,2,4,5)P4 was 30 times more
intense than that of the next most fluorescent benzene tetrakisphosphate,
compound 5 Bz(1,2,3,5)P4, and approximately
10% of that of tryptophan (Figure ). These observations match the trends predicted by
TD-DFT (Tables S1 and S2). The calculations
for compound 8 5-OH-Bz(1,2,4)P3 predict that
the excitation maximum of 5-OH-Bz(1,2,4)P3 is 6 nm greater
than that of compound 6 Bz(1,2,4,5)P4, a prediction
confirmed by empirical measurement (Figure and Table S1).
Similarly, TD-DFT predicts the emission maximum for compound 8 5-OH-Bz(1,2,4)P3 is 25 nm greater than that of
compound 6 Bz(1,2,4,5)P4 (Figure and Table S2).
Figure 5
(A) HPLC analysis of reaction of Bz(1,2,4,5)P4 (100
μM) incubated with SHIP2 (100 nM) at 16 °C for 0 h (blue
line), 10 h (amber line), and 12 h (red line). Substrate and products
were detected by fluorescence (excitation at 280 nm, emission at 330
nm). (B,C) Fluorescence of the same samples diluted 100-fold in acetonitrile.
SHIP2 (100 nM) alone shown as a dark green line on the baseline: (B)
excitation scans with emission at 330 nm and (C) emission scans excited
at 280 nm.
(A) HPLC analysis of reaction of Bz(1,2,4,5)P4 (100
μM) incubated with SHIP2 (100 nM) at 16 °C for 0 h (blue
line), 10 h (amber line), and 12 h (red line). Substrate and products
were detected by fluorescence (excitation at 280 nm, emission at 330
nm). (B,C) Fluorescence of the same samples diluted 100-fold in acetonitrile.
SHIP2 (100 nM) alone shown as a dark green line on the baseline: (B)
excitation scans with emission at 330 nm and (C) emission scans excited
at 280 nm.As TD-DFT predicts that compound 6 Bz(1,2,4,5)P4 and its hydrolysis product compound 8 5-OH-Bz(1,2,4)P3 show significant fluorescence
intensity, we devised an HPLC
separation that could be used with fluorescence detection for benzene
phosphates. First, we established separations following UV absorbance
(Figure S2). HPLC resolved all the discrete
benzene trisphosphates and tetrakisphosphates used in this study.
Compound 6 Bz(1,2,4,5)P4 that eluted at approximately
37 min could also be detected by fluorescence with excitation at 280
nm and emission at 330 nm. In the first instance, we wanted to use
the HPLC method to investigate whether SHIP2 could convert compound 6 Bz(1,2,4,5)P4 into compound 8 5-OH-Bz(1,2,4)P3. Therefore, we selected conditions that would limit the extent
of reaction to a predominant single dephosphorylation. Extended incubation
of 100 μM of compound 6 Bz(1,2,4,5)P4 with 100 nM SHIP2 allowed us to monitor the progression of the reaction
without interference from other fluorescent products as judged by
HPLC (Figure A). Over
a period of 12 h, the fluorescence intensity of the parent peak at
37 min diminished correlating with the appearance of an earlier-eluting
peak at 30 min (Figure A). As we did not have the assumed product, compound 8 5-OH-Bz(1,2,4)P3, to confirm the identity of the peak
at 30 min (Figure A), we sought confirmation by recording fluorescence excitation and
emission spectra of the accumulated products (Figures B,C).Samples analyzed in Figure A were diluted 100-fold
into acetonitrile, and fluorescence
spectra were recorded (Figure B,C). As the proportion of the product increased, the red
shifts in the fluorescence spectra increased correspondingly. After
12 h incubation, the excitation maximum of the assumed product, compound 8 5-OH-Bz(1,2,4)P3, was 7 nm greater than that
of the starting material (Figure B). This compares favorably to the shift of +6 nm predicted
by TD-DFT for compound 6 Bz(1,2,4,5)P4 converting
to compound 8 5-OH-Bz(1,2,4)P3 (Table S1). The emission maximum of the product
was 25 nm greater than that of the starting material (Figure C). This also compares favorably
to the predicted shift of +25 nm for compound 6 Bz(1,2,4,5)P4 converting to compound 8 5-OH-Bz(1,2,4)P3 (Table S2). As discussed in Supporting Information, the predicted transition
energies for excitation and emission differ systematically from the
experimentally determined values so that variations between compounds
can be defined in terms of wavelength shifts. A similar observation
has previously been noted for this type of TD-DFT analysis.[19,20] From the close match between the predicted and observed wavelength
shifts, we can conclude that compound 8 5-OH-Bz(1,2,4)P3 is formed when compound 6 Bz(1,2,4,5)P4 is incubated with SHIP2 under these conditions.In order to
investigate further the effects of SHIP2 on compound 6 Bz(1,2,4,5)P4, 100 μM of the substrate
was incubated for 2 h with increasing amounts of SHIP2. This demonstrated
that the conversion of compound 6 Bz(1,2,4,5)P4 into its first hydrolysis product, compound 8 5-OH-Bz(1,2,4)P3, is dependent on the SHIP2 concentration and that compound 6 Bz(1,2,4,5)P4 alone is stable under these conditions
(Figure S3). Longer incubation and use
of tandem UV-fluorescence detection resulted in a more complicated
product profile with peaks of increased absorbance: fluorescence ratio
at 30, 25, 23, and 13 min (Figure S4).
This is consistent with successive dephosphorylation generating a
sequence of different hydroxybenzene phosphate compounds with different
elution profiles as observed for inositol phosphates.[21]The change in fluorescence that accompanies the conversion
of substrate
to product can be used to develop a real-time fluorescence-based assay
to follow dephosphorylation of compound 6 Bz(1,2,4,5)P4 by the exemplar 5-phosphatase SHIP2 (Figure ). In the absence of competing additives,
the fluorescence intensity at 325 nm reduces, and the maximum shifts
to a longer wavelength as the reaction between SHIP2 and compound 6 Bz(1,2,4,5)P4 progresses (Figure A). Figure B traces how the emission intensity at 325 nm (the
maximum for compound 6 Bz(1,2,4,5)P4) decreases
with time. It also shows how this decrease is affected by additives
that are reported to be substrates or inhibitors of SHIP2 activity.
The rate of the intensity decrease slows down considerably in the
presence of the natural substrate Ins(1,3,4,5)P4, which,
as shown in Figure , is 10 times more active in terms of phosphate release than any
of the benzene phosphates. In the presence of the SHIP2 inhibitor
AS1949490, there is an initial decrease in fluorescence intensity
that matches that of the reaction with no additives indicating that,
in the initial stages under these conditions, we are not seeing inhibition
of SHIP2 activity with compound 6 Bz(1,2,4,5)P4. This experiment is not an exhaustive analysis of the substrates
competing for SHIP2 activity but serves to demonstrate the utility
of benzene phosphate fluorescence in this context.
Figure 6
(A) Change in fluorescence
of compound 6 Bz(1,2,4,5)P4 (100 μM)
incubated with SHIP2 (1 μM) at 23 °C
recording emission scans excited at 280 nm over a period of 2 h. (B)
Change in emission intensity at 325 nm with time for compound 6 Bz(1,2,4,5)P4 incubated with SHIP2; with no other
additives (dark blue line), with Ins(1,3,4,5)P4 (50 μM)
(peach line), and with SHIP2 inhibitor AS1949490 (100 μM) (light
blue line).
(A) Change in fluorescence
of compound 6 Bz(1,2,4,5)P4 (100 μM)
incubated with SHIP2 (1 μM) at 23 °C
recording emission scans excited at 280 nm over a period of 2 h. (B)
Change in emission intensity at 325 nm with time for compound 6 Bz(1,2,4,5)P4 incubated with SHIP2; with no other
additives (dark blue line), with Ins(1,3,4,5)P4 (50 μM)
(peach line), and with SHIP2 inhibitor AS1949490 (100 μM) (light
blue line).While there is much to take account
of when designing such an experiment,
we have proved the utility of TD-DFT to select from a regioisomeric
family of benzene tris- and tetrakisphosphates for the compound with
the best fluorescent properties to monitor 5-phosphatase, specifically
SHIP2, activity. Interestingly, benzene phosphates appear to undergo
successive dephosphorylations with SHIP2, in contrast to the single
5-dephosphorylation of inositol phosphate substrates. By judicious
choice of a symmetrical tetrakisphosphate and careful titration of
enzyme, we were able to limit the extent of reaction to a predominant
single dephosphorylation. Interestingly, toward the end of the experiment
shown in Figure A
there is a slight shift to shorter wavelength again, most likely reflecting
further dephosphorylation of the 5-OH-Bz(1,2,4)P3 product.To explore further the catalytic flexibility engendered in phosphate-substituted
benzenes, we also sought to define the products of successive dephosphorylation
of the more weakly fluorescent compound 4, Bz(1,2,3,4)P4 (Figure S5), for which a number
of potential dephosphorylation products are available. Accordingly,
we included compound 7 3-OH-Bz(1,2,4)P3 and
the newly synthesized compounds 9 1,2-Di-OH-Bz(3,4)P2 and 10 1,3-Di-OH-Bz(2,4)P2 in our
analysis (full details and structures of these compounds are given
in Supporting Information). We did not
detect the accumulation of compound 7, 3-OH-Bz(1,2,4)P3 from compound 4 Bz(1,2,3,4)P4. This
does not rule out its production or that of 1-OH-Bz(2,3,4)P3 as there is the possibility that the first product of hydrolysis
is rapidly dephosphorylated to Di-OH-BzP2 products. Indeed,
compound 9 1,2-Di-OH-Bz(3,4)P2 = 3,4-Di-OH-Bz(1,2)P2 was generated by SHIP2 from compound 4 Bz(1,2,3,4)P4 (Figure S4) and, from Figure S1, we can see that compound 7 3-OH-Bz(1,2,4)P3 is a better phosphate-releasing substrate
than compound 4 Bz(1,2,3,4)P4. Consistently,
SHIP2 action on compound 7 3-OH-Bz(1,2,4)P3 yielded multiple products including compound 9 1,2-Di-OH-Bz(3,4)P2 = 3,4-Di-OH-Bz(1,2)P2, but not compound 10 1,3-Di-OH-Bz(2,4)P2 = 2,4-Di-OH-Bz(1,3)P2 (Figure S4). [2,3-Di-OH-Bz(1,4)P2 was not available to test.] The intricacies of this analysis
demonstrate further the advantages of a planned approach to selecting
substrates with the most suitable properties for probing selected
mechanisms of protein activity.To summarize, with interest
in the utility of benzene phosphates
as ligands of diverse inositide/phosphoinositide-binding proteins/enzymes,
we have shown that, uniquely among characterized ligands of 5-phosphatases,
benzene phosphates have the properties of bona fide substrate analogs. Indeed, benzene tris- and tetrakisphosphates
are inhibitors of Type I and Type II inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatases,[9,12] while compound 4 Bz(1,2,3,4)P4 is a tight
binding ligand of the PH domain of PKB/Akt.[22] Compound 6 Bz(1,2,4,5)P4 is an inhibitor
of SHIP2[10] and a structure was solved for
a binary complex with INPP5B.[12] Here we
show that benzene phosphates are surrogate substrates of the canonical
5-phosphatase SHIP2 by virtue of their regiochemistry. This mimics
well the stereoisomerism but not enantiomerism of inositides
and phosphoinositides. Clearly these compounds could find utility
with a range of inositol phosphate phosphatases beyond 5-phosphatases,
e.g., 3-phosphatases typified by PTEN or 4-phosphatases such as SopB.
The demonstration that they are substrates and can be used for real-time
assays affords great opportunity for the study of allosteric regulation
of catalytic activity by ligand binding to distal domains of the full-length
protein.Because of its relatively strong absorption and fluorescence
emission,
compound 6 Bz(1,2,4,5)P4 is shown to be a
promising spectroscopic probe for inositol 5-phosphatase(s). It may
also be of use for proteins lacking catalytic activity since, as demonstrated,
it is a good ligand of inositol phosphate-binding sites. Beyond this,
the combination of TD-DFT and enzymological approaches could direct
the synthesis of new probes for the study of specific aspects of protein
structure and function. For real time assays, designed to screen potential
inhibitors of protein activity, there is opportunity to design chromophores
with enhanced, perhaps further red-shifted, fluorescence. Spectral
separation from tryptophan, either in excitation and/or emission,
might enable polarization-based approaches to inhibitor screening
of inositol phosphate-metabolizing enzymes as we have described with
2-FAM-InsP5 for IPK1,[13] but
without the potential constraints of bulky fluorophore substituents.
Probes might be synthesized to retain the ligand coordination of bona fide substrates and/or might afford a range of binding
constants tailored for particular experimental scenarios, cf. ion-sensing
fluorescent probes. Thus, we envisage our methods will enable prediction
and testing of poly-substituted benzenes that retain the regiochemistry
of a favored ligand while building in the spectroscopic opportunity
of substitution with other functionalities. The diversification of
simple aryl ligands to include other functionalities may further find
use as structure-stabilizing ligands enabling crystallization of recalcitrant
inositol-related protein targets.[12] In
summary, there is wide-ranging potential in this field for the application
of TD-DFT to aid decisions over probe synthesis and experiment design.
Authors: Robert J Gruninger; Selina Dobing; Adam D Smith; Lisza M Bruder; L Brent Selinger; Hans-Joachim Wieden; Steven C Mosimann Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2011-12-02 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Stephen J Mills; David Komander; Melanie N Trusselle; Stephen T Safrany; Daan M F van Aalten; Barry V L Potter Journal: ACS Chem Biol Date: 2007-04-24 Impact factor: 5.100
Authors: Hayley Whitfield; Megan Gilmartin; Kendall Baker; Andrew M Riley; H Y Godage; Barry V L Potter; Andrew M Hemmings; Charles A Brearley Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2018-09-19 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Amerah M Al-Soliemy; Osman I Osman; Mahmoud A Hussein; Abdullah M Asiri; Samy A El-Daly Journal: J Fluoresc Date: 2016-04-15 Impact factor: 2.217
Authors: Hayley Whitfield; Andrew M Hemmings; Stephen J Mills; Kendall Baker; Gaye White; Stuart Rushworth; Andrew M Riley; Barry V L Potter; Charles A Brearley Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2021-03-16 Impact factor: 7.446