| Literature DB >> 32184752 |
Li Shang1, Hong Chu1, Zuneng Lu1.
Abstract
Objective: The objectives of this work were to identify the characteristics of repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS) in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and further verify the electrophysiological exclusion criteria of ALS.Entities:
Keywords: amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; compound muscle action potential; electrophysiological diagnostic criteria; neuromuscular junctions; repetitive nerve stimulation
Year: 2020 PMID: 32184752 PMCID: PMC7059024 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00101
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
RNS decremental amplitude and frequency in ALS patients.
| ≥20% | 16 | 10.7 | 1 | 0.7 |
| ≥15% | 15 | 10.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| ≥10% | 31 | 20.7 | 2 | 1.3 |
| ≥5% | 27 | 18.0 | 15 | 10.0 |
| <5% | 61 | 40.6 | 132 | 88.0 |
| Total | 150 | 100.0 | 150 | 100.0 |
Trap, trapezius muscle; ADM, abductor digiti minimi; RNS, repetitive nerve stimulation; ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
Figure 1(A) Decremental frequency in the Trap and ADM of ALS patients. (B) Decremental percentage in the Trap and ADM of ALS patients. Trap, trapezius muscle; ADM, abductor digiti minimi.
Comparison of positive and negative decrements in ALS patients.
| Sex, | ||||
| Male | 32 (51.6) | 54 (61.4) | 1.414 | 0.234 |
| Female | 30 (48.4) | 34 (38.6) | ||
| Onset age (years) | 55.12 ± 11.95 | 55.71 ± 10.63 | −0.316 | 0.752 |
| Disease duration (months) [ | 12.00 (11.5) | 9.50 (11.5) | −1.695 | 0.090 |
| ALSFRS-R [ | 39.00 (6.0) | 41.00 (5.0) | −2.588 | 0.010 |
| Disease progression rate [ | 0.75 (0.7) | 0.70 (1.0) | −0.220 | 0.826 |
| Onset site, | ||||
| Bulbar | 12 (19.4) | 22 (25.0) | 0.661 | 0.416 |
| Upper limb | 30 (48.4) | 45 (51.1) | 0.833 | 0.316 |
| Lower limb | 20 (32.3) | 21 (23.9) | ||
| CMAP amplitude (mV) | ||||
| Trap | 7.53 ± 3.59 | 9.10 ± 3.25 | −2.788 | 0.006 |
| ADM | 7.99 ± 3.74 | 9.94 ± 3.39 | −3.319 | 0.001 |
+, Positive decrement; –, Negative decrement.
ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; CMAP, compound muscle action potential; Trap, trapezius muscle; ADM, abductor digiti minimi.
χ2-value.
z-value.
t-value.
Bulbar vs. limb onset.
Upper limb onset vs. lower limb onset.
Figure 2Correlations between the CMAP amplitude and decremental percentages in TRAP (A) and ADM (B). Decr(%), percentage of decremental response; CMAP, compound muscle action potential; Trap, trapezius muscle; ADM, abductor digiti minimi.